Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 07:47:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: mtgox servers  (Read 2801 times)
cosmicone
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10



View Profile
April 14, 2013, 04:15:15 AM
 #21

LOL Raid 1 on their backup data server?  WTF?  Raid 1???  Even Raid 5 is no good...   Spend less on equipment, and more on someone that knows what they are doing.
1714031232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031232
Reply with quote  #2

1714031232
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714031232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031232
Reply with quote  #2

1714031232
Report to moderator
1714031232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031232
Reply with quote  #2

1714031232
Report to moderator
1714031232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031232
Reply with quote  #2

1714031232
Report to moderator
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
April 14, 2013, 04:54:26 AM
 #22

So...  does it seem to anyone that their hardware is extremely underutilized and their software is inefficient?

4x 8 core CPUs and shit tons of RAM should be able to handle more than 1 transaction per second. 

Yes it likely should be sufficient to handle 100x that, assuming the single box was used as dedicated trading engine with other servers used to offload other tasks (API access, webserver, support, charting, etc).
aantonop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 116


Entrepreneur, coder, hacker, pundit, humanist.


View Profile WWW
April 14, 2013, 05:03:57 AM
 #23

You can't run an exchange as a single-stack application. No way it will scale.

The fact that they are still trying to throw hardware at this means they simply do not understand scaling.

They will not solve these problems because they don't have a clue how to solve them


RUN AWAY, don't just walk away.

Bitcoin entrepreneur - OpenBitcoinStore,SafePaperWallet,BitcoinPressCenter.org... and more.
Host on LetsTalkBitcoin.
jubalix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
April 14, 2013, 05:07:34 AM
 #24

hmm looked under kill to me by far

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist. B.Engineering/B.Laws

https://www.binance.com/?ref=10062065
jzcjca00
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 14, 2013, 05:14:03 AM
 #25

The database on the main server should be entirely on SSD.  It's small enough.

RAID1 is appropriate, as disks are cheap, and they really aren't using much space.  Downtime is more expensive than disks.

There should be a secondary server with a copy of the database replicated in real time just for handling read only transactions, like clarkmoody.com, bitcoin itty.org, etc.  And a backup for it, too.  The main server is obviously still overloaded.

They are underconfigured andneed to stop thinking smalltime!  

But most important, they need to stop th spambots from choking the system with .001 BTC orders.  An easy way to do that is set a minimum fee per trade of .006 BTC.  This would only impact the nuisance orders, since any reasonable person is trading at least 1 BTC.


Tips much appreciated! 1PPJHDawPvjh6MEzsvXrMYLgpLmyAaNXUc
MarKusRomanus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 14, 2013, 05:43:01 AM
 #26

If your systems are behind Nic cards that are 2gbps and you are being hit by a DDos of 10gbps.. how are you supposed to protect from that?  That size DDos will just halt all traffic just from the bottleneck effect.
MarKusRomanus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 14, 2013, 05:49:45 AM
 #27

Actually what I meant to say is that their main line into their server room(s) has to be a 1000gbps  capable line.. and they need a minimum of 10gbps bandwidth to survive . their servers behind whatever protection they come up with can be 2gbps  .. no problem.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!