ICOcountdown.com, will you list Edon again after dev had responded?
I cannot find any information on this individual or the team behind them. I cannot even look at or audit the source code, the exact same reason why NODE was destroyed and it's being repeated again, with the same exact values which is "closed source", also there are huge problems with closed source development such as security risks. Too much risk on my part to list this again. I have no personal vendetta here, but to protect my userbase I will not be listing this because there is simply no way of telling if the original source code was taken then reused again or what even happened with that project. The developers are the same as before, anonymous and do not speak out thus it is high risk.
I have a facebook profile to go on, no linkedin to deciminate work experience or any sort of connections or otherwise and there is red flags on that such as a false verified sign.
My assumption is the escrow conditions are going to be something along the lines of "a working wallet", the escrow conditions will not have anything to do with the assumptions stated in the first post also known as the technologies, because of it being closed source you will not even know if these technologies are implemented.
TL:DR If node.js wanted to stop the same issues from happening with NODE again he would make it open source. There is nothing stopping the exact same thing happening once again to this community/userbase as it did to the NODE userbase, the exact same things Node.js spoke out about he is repeating.
I can only think for what purpose?