★★★ Bitcoin Video Casino ★★★ - ||| Over 500 BTC in Progressive Jackpots! |||

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Losing black jacks to black jacks? Shouldn't that be a push? Not liking this one bit...I'll just not play blackjack!

Yes, if you both get blackjack it's a push. If the game is not doing that, please press the green "verify" button and send all the information to admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com and we will take a closer look. We have never heard of the user losing despite getting blackjack, but we will of course investigate this.

[1713278901]

1713278901

[1713278901]

1713278901

[1713278901]

1713278901

[bitboy1x]

Here's the rules you list
Minimum bet is 0.0001 BTC
Maximum bet is 1 BTC
Blackjack pays 3:2
Insurance pays 2:1
Number of decks is 5
Number of allowed splits is 3
Dealer does not hit on soft 17
Can double after split
Can not hit split aces
Can resplit aces
Can double on first two
Dealer does not peek

-----------------
Where does it say that you lose both bets when you double down and the dealer has blackjack?
Where does it say that you lose all split aces that are 10A (KA etc) vs a dealer blackjack?

Are more rules listed somewhere else?

No response to this?  You pretty much make up extra rules that no other casino has, then reply back with "we only have 0.5% advantage" etc.

You say to check the rules, so I check the rules.  None of this rip off parts are listed (lose both hands when you double and dealer has a BJ.  Lose both hands when you split against an ace.  Lose any hands where you split and get A10 and dealer has 21.)

Thumbs down to you.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Here's the rules you list
Minimum bet is 0.0001 BTC
Maximum bet is 1 BTC
Blackjack pays 3:2
Insurance pays 2:1
Number of decks is 5
Number of allowed splits is 3
Dealer does not hit on soft 17
Can double after split
Can not hit split aces
Can resplit aces
Can double on first two
Dealer does not peek

-----------------
Where does it say that you lose both bets when you double down and the dealer has blackjack?
Where does it say that you lose all split aces that are 10A (KA etc) vs a dealer blackjack?

Are more rules listed somewhere else?

No response to this?  You pretty much make up extra rules that no other casino has, then reply back with "we only have 0.5% advantage" etc.

You say to check the rules, so I check the rules.  None of this rip off parts are listed (lose both hands when you double and dealer has a BJ.  Lose both hands when you split against an ace.  Lose any hands where you split and get A10 and dealer has 21.)

Thumbs down to you.

Hi,

If I am understanding you correctly, the three issues that you presented boil down to this one issue: When you split on aces or tens and then get 21, you still end up losing if the dealer gets blackjack. As far as we can tell, this is standard blackjack behavior. This is why we don't list this in the rules. Your hand and the dealer's hand only counts as a blackjack if the first two cards are 21. Once you have split your hand, you will have now played more than two cards.

Here is a quote from wikipedia: "As a general rule, a ten on a split ace (or vice versa) is not considered a natural blackjack and does not get any bonus."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aces_and_eights_(blackjack)#Splitting

If you were to get 21 with three cards, and the dealer has blackjack, the dealer will win. Similarly, if you get blackjack and the dealer does not also have blackjack, you win no matter what since the best hand he could get would be 21 with three or more cards.

The relevant thing that we do list in the rules is "dealer does not peek". This means that if the dealer has blackjack, he does not immediately tell you. We could look into adding dealer peeking, but then we would need to change other rules in the dealer's favor to ensure that the house edge stays at 0.5% before progressive jackpot contributions.

[AcePuppy]

Another bots win. This is all I could get before it went off screen.

Jan 28, 2015 at 2:33pm   a2540a97f6   Jacks or Better   0.0005   Royal Flush   0.5258
Jan 28, 2015 at 2:33pm   bba2d33c35   Jacks or Better   0.0005   4 of a Kind   0.0125
Jan 28, 2015 at 2:33pm   64dc97020d   Jacks or Better   0.0005   4 of a Kind   0.0125

Person that won jackpot is of course on the top 20 leaderboard.


User               Total Bitcoin winnings
a2540a97f6            2878.5747186

[bitboy1x]

Hi,

If I am understanding you correctly, the three issues that you presented boil down to this one issue: When you split on aces or tens and then get 21, you still end up losing if the dealer gets blackjack. As far as we can tell, this is standard blackjack behavior. This is why we don't list this in the rules. Your hand and the dealer's hand only counts as a blackjack if the first two cards are 21. Once you have split your hand, you will have now played more than two cards.

Here is a quote from wikipedia: "As a general rule, a ten on a split ace (or vice versa) is not considered a natural blackjack and does not get any bonus."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aces_and_eights_(blackjack)#Splitting

If you were to get 21 with three cards, and the dealer has blackjack, the dealer will win. Similarly, if you get blackjack and the dealer does not also have blackjack, you win no matter what since the best hand he could get would be 21 with three or more cards.

The relevant thing that we do list in the rules is "dealer does not peek". This means that if the dealer has blackjack, he does not immediately tell you. We could look into adding dealer peeking, but then we would need to change other rules in the dealer's favor to ensure that the house edge stays at 0.5% before progressive jackpot contributions.

Sites that offer dealer peek, don't offer push on doubles or splits vs. a blackjack
Sites that don't offer peek - push on doubles or splits vs. blackjack

How about you limit the number of splits on aces to make up the difference?  Offering  surrender or dealer peek would sure eliminate a lot of what looks like real unfair.

And considering not everyone plays progressive jackpots, I could care less if that was eliminated to help improve the fairness.

At minimum, progressive jackpots should only come from the btc people who play the progressive put into it.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Hi,

If I am understanding you correctly, the three issues that you presented boil down to this one issue: When you split on aces or tens and then get 21, you still end up losing if the dealer gets blackjack. As far as we can tell, this is standard blackjack behavior. This is why we don't list this in the rules. Your hand and the dealer's hand only counts as a blackjack if the first two cards are 21. Once you have split your hand, you will have now played more than two cards.

Here is a quote from wikipedia: "As a general rule, a ten on a split ace (or vice versa) is not considered a natural blackjack and does not get any bonus."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aces_and_eights_(blackjack)#Splitting

If you were to get 21 with three cards, and the dealer has blackjack, the dealer will win. Similarly, if you get blackjack and the dealer does not also have blackjack, you win no matter what since the best hand he could get would be 21 with three or more cards.

The relevant thing that we do list in the rules is "dealer does not peek". This means that if the dealer has blackjack, he does not immediately tell you. We could look into adding dealer peeking, but then we would need to change other rules in the dealer's favor to ensure that the house edge stays at 0.5% before progressive jackpot contributions.

Sites that offer dealer peek, don't offer push on doubles or splits vs. a blackjack
Sites that don't offer peek - push on doubles or splits vs. blackjack

How about you limit the number of splits on aces to make up the difference?  Offering  surrender or dealer peek would sure eliminate a lot of what looks like real unfair.

And considering not everyone plays progressive jackpots, I could care less if that was eliminated to help improve the fairness.

At minimum, progressive jackpots should only come from the btc people who play the progressive put into it.

Hi,

Could you find us some online blackjack rules somewhere that state that if the dealer does not peek, then 21 vs dealer blackjack is a push when you split? We would be very interested to learn about this, and if this is universally the accepted rule then we will fix this on our site right away. We have implemented this site with our understanding of the Blackjack rules, but if something is not correct we will change it.

We can also look into enabling dealer peek at the cost of altering something else. This would be a bit more involved to implement, since it would require changes to the server back end, provably fair code, user interface, and then a lot of testing.

We can't have two sets of rules depending on whether the user is playing the progressive game or not. That would be too confusing for the user.

When we decided to build this site, everyone agreed that each game should have a progressive jackpot that all bets contribute towards it, and we are going to stick with that decision.

[Dogedigital]

Hi,

If I am understanding you correctly, the three issues that you presented boil down to this one issue: When you split on aces or tens and then get 21, you still end up losing if the dealer gets blackjack. As far as we can tell, this is standard blackjack behavior. This is why we don't list this in the rules. Your hand and the dealer's hand only counts as a blackjack if the first two cards are 21. Once you have split your hand, you will have now played more than two cards.

Here is a quote from wikipedia: "As a general rule, a ten on a split ace (or vice versa) is not considered a natural blackjack and does not get any bonus."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aces_and_eights_(blackjack)#Splitting

If you were to get 21 with three cards, and the dealer has blackjack, the dealer will win. Similarly, if you get blackjack and the dealer does not also have blackjack, you win no matter what since the best hand he could get would be 21 with three or more cards.

The relevant thing that we do list in the rules is "dealer does not peek". This means that if the dealer has blackjack, he does not immediately tell you. We could look into adding dealer peeking, but then we would need to change other rules in the dealer's favor to ensure that the house edge stays at 0.5% before progressive jackpot contributions.

Sites that offer dealer peek, don't offer push on doubles or splits vs. a blackjack
Sites that don't offer peek - push on doubles or splits vs. blackjack

How about you limit the number of splits on aces to make up the difference?  Offering  surrender or dealer peek would sure eliminate a lot of what looks like real unfair.

And considering not everyone plays progressive jackpots, I could care less if that was eliminated to help improve the fairness.

At minimum, progressive jackpots should only come from the btc people who play the progressive put into it.

Hi,

Could you find us some online blackjack rules somewhere that state that if the dealer does not peek, then 21 vs dealer blackjack is a push when you split? We would be very interested to learn about this, and if this is universally the accepted rule then we will fix this on our site right away. We have implemented this site with our understanding of the Blackjack rules, but if something is not correct we will change it.

We can also look into enabling dealer peek at the cost of altering something else. This would be a bit more involved to implement, since it would require changes to the server back end, provably fair code, user interface, and then a lot of testing.

We can't have two sets of rules depending on whether the user is playing the progressive game or not. That would be too confusing for the user.

When we decided to build this site, everyone agreed that each game should have a progressive jackpot that all bets contribute towards it, and we are going to stick with that decision.

This is beautiful customer service right here.  Direct and informative answers.  Other gaming sites take note. 

[AcePuppy]

Like I said to my previous message of a bot win with Video Poker, that went un-replied to. Here is another bot win in Roulette. Goes to show most of these wins are nothing but BOTS. You said you wanted names. I gave you some previously and some more now.

Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Three zeroes   4.5978562
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Two zeroes   0.0286
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fb860b530f           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   bba2d33c35          Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c      Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ac214f521e           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fc70c4fed4           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   7b4900dea4   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Like I said to my previous message of a bot win with Video Poker, that went un-replied to. Here is another bot win in Roulette. Goes to show most of these wins are nothing but BOTS. You said you wanted names. I gave you some previously and some more now.

Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Three zeroes   4.5978562
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Two zeroes   0.0286
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fb860b530f           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   bba2d33c35          Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c      Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ac214f521e           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fc70c4fed4           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   7b4900dea4   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037

I took a look at these accounts. Most of them were playing at a rate of 2-4 games per second, which is about the same as a user playing on autoplay in a single screen.

One account (it didn't win) was playing at a rate of 10 games per second, which could be a bot or multiple browser sessions playing at the same time. If the account shows up again we'll take a closer look.

Please keep in mind that the above list of users is showing a full minute of play. So even a regular user would get in a lot of games during these 60 seconds. 4 games per second on autoplay would be 240 games per minute, which would result in hitting 0 about 6 times every minute.

[AcePuppy]

Like I said to my previous message of a bot win with Video Poker, that went un-replied to. Here is another bot win in Roulette. Goes to show most of these wins are nothing but BOTS. You said you wanted names. I gave you some previously and some more now.

Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Three zeroes   4.5978562
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Two zeroes   0.0286
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fb860b530f           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   bba2d33c35          Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c      Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ac214f521e           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fc70c4fed4           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   7b4900dea4   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037

I took a look at these accounts. Most of them were playing at a rate of 2-4 games per second, which is about the same as a user playing on autoplay in a single screen.

One account (it didn't win) was playing at a rate of 10 games per second, which could be a bot or multiple browser sessions playing at the same time. If the account shows up again we'll take a closer look.

Please keep in mind that the above list of users is showing a full minute of play. So even a regular user would get in a lot of games during these 60 seconds. 4 games per second on autoplay would be 240 games per minute, which would result in hitting 0 about 6 times every minute.

These BOTS, were playing for approximately 15 minutes until the jackpot was hit and stopped immediately after it was hit. Again, you want us to help detect these people and then you won't even help.

[LtPaxIV]

hello why cant i check my personal stats? i have no adblock enabled and did try with multiple browsers.if i click my name for the stats just nothing happens,same for other users i did try,in the login window

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

hello why cant i check my personal stats? i have no adblock enabled and did try with multiple browsers.if i click my name for the stats just nothing happens,same for other users i did try,in the login window

We have temporarily disabled the stats display since they were causing some problems on the database. When we build a better solution we can enable them again.

If you'd like us to look up some stats for your account, please feel free to email us at admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com and we can check the database for you.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

One of the hard disks on the server seems to have gotten filled up, so the server is experiencing some problems. We have temporarily taken down the server while we fix this.

I am really sorry about the inconvenience. All accounts and deposits are fine.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

One of the hard disks on the server seems to have gotten filled up, so the server is experiencing some problems. We have temporarily taken down the server while we fix this.

I am really sorry about the inconvenience. All accounts and deposits are fine.

The site now up again. All deposits and accounts are fine. I'm really sorry about the inconvenience.

[john3136]

Is there a problem with your email server?  I have been emailing admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com repeatedly for the last two days about a problem with my account and I have still received no response.

[sngwinner]

Like I said to my previous message of a bot win with Video Poker, that went un-replied to. Here is another bot win in Roulette. Goes to show most of these wins are nothing but BOTS. You said you wanted names. I gave you some previously and some more now.

Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Three zeroes   4.5978562
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Two zeroes   0.0286
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fb860b530f           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   bba2d33c35          Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c      Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ac214f521e           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fc70c4fed4           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   7b4900dea4   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037

I took a look at these accounts. Most of them were playing at a rate of 2-4 games per second, which is about the same as a user playing on autoplay in a single screen.

One account (it didn't win) was playing at a rate of 10 games per second, which could be a bot or multiple browser sessions playing at the same time. If the account shows up again we'll take a closer look.

Please keep in mind that the above list of users is showing a full minute of play. So even a regular user would get in a lot of games during these 60 seconds. 4 games per second on autoplay would be 240 games per minute, which would result in hitting 0 about 6 times every minute.

These BOTS, were playing for approximately 15 minutes until the jackpot was hit and stopped immediately after it was hit. Again, you want us to help detect these people and then you won't even help.

Acepuppy,

I made a post in this thread over a year ago about bots playing video poker at a furious pace as soon as the royal progressive made it a positive play. Bitcoinvideocasino (BVC) basically shrugged it off as legitimate. The conclusion I have made is that it's either BVC operating the bots to skim off the progressives or if it isn't that then BVC simply doesn't care if an advantage player is taking all of the coins out of their progressives. It seems unlikely that it's the latter as coins in the hands of regular players would likely be lost to BVC in the future so I think they have some hand in it.

The bots play hundred or thousands of hands per minute at the moment the progressive becomes positive. This is the reason I no longer play on the site even though I have no reason to believe the games are fixed.

[AcePuppy]

Like I said to my previous message of a bot win with Video Poker, that went un-replied to. Here is another bot win in Roulette. Goes to show most of these wins are nothing but BOTS. You said you wanted names. I gave you some previously and some more now.

Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Three zeroes   4.5978562
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Two zeroes   0.0286
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   4428a16881   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fb860b530f           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   bba2d33c35          Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c      Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ac214f521e           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   78913e808c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   fc70c4fed4           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   7b4900dea4   Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   ba0b35c58d           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037
Jan 30, 2015 at 4:06pm   3ba50cfa8c           Roulette   0.0002   Hit 0   0.0037

I took a look at these accounts. Most of them were playing at a rate of 2-4 games per second, which is about the same as a user playing on autoplay in a single screen.

One account (it didn't win) was playing at a rate of 10 games per second, which could be a bot or multiple browser sessions playing at the same time. If the account shows up again we'll take a closer look.

Please keep in mind that the above list of users is showing a full minute of play. So even a regular user would get in a lot of games during these 60 seconds. 4 games per second on autoplay would be 240 games per minute, which would result in hitting 0 about 6 times every minute.

These BOTS, were playing for approximately 15 minutes until the jackpot was hit and stopped immediately after it was hit. Again, you want us to help detect these people and then you won't even help.

Acepuppy,

I made a post in this thread over a year ago about bots playing video poker at a furious pace as soon as the royal progressive made it a positive play. Bitcoinvideocasino (BVC) basically shrugged it off as legitimate. The conclusion I have made is that it's either BVC operating the bots to skim off the progressives or if it isn't that then BVC simply doesn't care if an advantage player is taking all of the coins out of their progressives. It seems unlikely that it's the latter as coins in the hands of regular players would likely be lost to BVC in the future so I think they have some hand in it.

The bots play hundred or thousands of hands per minute at the moment the progressive becomes positive. This is the reason I no longer play on the site even though I have no reason to believe the games are fixed.

Well said my friend.

[GoWest]

Is there a problem with your email server?  I have been emailing admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com repeatedly for the last two days about a problem with my account and I have still received no response.

Same here.  Let me know if you hear anything.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Is there a problem with your email server?  I have been emailing admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com repeatedly for the last two days about a problem with my account and I have still received no response.

Same here.  Let me know if you hear anything.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It looks like admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com was not forwarding to the correct email address. We have fixed the problem and are now working on replying to all of those emails. Sorry about that!

[sngwinner]

Could you please address your site's stance on using bots to play your games?  Particularly bots playing the games only when the progressive makes it a positive play?