BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
 |
October 12, 2015, 07:09:38 PM |
|
Since Trezor updated myTrezor.com have had no problems using Trezor either with it or Multibit HD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
October 28, 2015, 07:06:21 PM |
|
Since Trezor updated myTrezor.com have had no problems using Trezor either with it or Multibit HD.
Is Trezor wallet software implementing BIP 62? |
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
|
October 28, 2015, 08:02:06 PM
Last edit: October 29, 2015, 12:39:47 AM by BitcoinNewsMagazine |
|
Since Trezor updated myTrezor.com have had no problems using Trezor either with it or Multibit HD.
Is Trezor wallet software implementing BIP 62? Trezor signs LowS confirmed. |
|
|
|
|
TTMNewsMJ
|
|
October 29, 2015, 12:20:23 AM |
|
Try the mycellium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
quantumgravity
|
|
October 29, 2015, 12:30:05 AM |
|
I think, the one which does not spend UTXO or at least offers a choice not to spend the UTXO, will serve the best...
Use bitcoin-qt always. |
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
October 29, 2015, 12:34:34 AM |
|
or at least offers a choice not to spend the UTXO ...
malleability is always from a corrupted (or not BIP66 enforced) branch of client "connected" to the bitcoin network. Bitcoin usually clients can not use the respend feature of a successfully emited transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
poncom
|
|
October 29, 2015, 02:10:41 AM |
|
Rather than knowing the best wallet to use I'd like to know if there are any wallets we should avoid because of how they cope with malleability. Are they all OK if we wait for six confirmations or are there some that malfunction even after six confirmations? I haven't moved many Bitcoins since the attack so I have not experienced the malleability problem yet.
|
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
|
October 29, 2015, 07:26:19 AM |
|
Rather than knowing the best wallet to use I'd like to know if there are any wallets we should avoid because of how they cope with malleability. Are they all OK if we wait for six confirmations or are there some that malfunction even after six confirmations?
-snip-
A single confirmation should be enough. If want to avoid issues with orphaned blocks, go for two confirmations. Deeper reorgs of blocks are rare. From what I read here, the most problematic wallet in that regard is blockchain.info. Not only did it handle the malleated TX badly, it also changed the balance to values that have nothing to do with the state of the blockchain. E.g. your balance could have doubled or gone negative. It also allowed you to build TX on top of this nonsense AFAIK. This might have been fixed durring their latest downtime, but I would still use a different wallet ASAP. |
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
|
Shattered
|
|
October 31, 2015, 05:43:12 AM |
|
I like to see topics like these discussed.
New users of BTC need to read threads like these and get informed as soon as possible.
We as a community need to do a better job of educating the general public.
The safer, easier, & faster the average users experience with bitcoin, the better.
With Apple pay rolling out new commercials lately, we need to be more vigilant in our efforts to educate people on why bitcoin is the single best form of payment for goods and services globally.
For the record, I have used BitcoinCore and MyCelium for a long time with no issues.
|
|
|
|
|
BirtRenaldsFan
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
February 19, 2016, 10:09:41 AM |
|
I think all wallets work similarly if not the same so I say it doesn't matter which one is selected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
calkob
|
|
February 19, 2016, 10:18:50 AM |
|
Bitcoin Core seems the most logical choice, I think. Armory allows you to handle this too, probably Electrum, but don't quote me on that. breadwallet also handles the situation quite well, but I'm not sure if it allows you to spend unconfirmed.
i used breadwallet for a while, then it absolutly shit it's self and never worked right agian. always frezzing and crashing |
|
|
|
|
|
ekoice
|
|
February 20, 2016, 12:59:55 PM |
|
Bitcoin Core seems the most logical choice, I think. Armory allows you to handle this too, probably Electrum, but don't quote me on that. breadwallet also handles the situation quite well, but I'm not sure if it allows you to spend unconfirmed.
i used breadwallet for a while, then it absolutly shit it's self and never worked right agian. always frezzing and crashing I tried bit coin chain and found its working well all right but its good to discuss on the forum here to get to know more information about bit coins wallets performances and for further guidance to all friends. |
|
|
|
|
pereira4
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
|
|
February 20, 2016, 02:19:42 PM |
|
Anything but Bitcoin Core is a risk to me. Sure im a paranoid, but as long as I can rull Bitcoin Core I will run it, that's I would hate so much that only big corporations can run nodes. I want to be able to run a node in my computer now and in 2064.
|
|
|
|
|
srinikethan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 20, 2016, 02:30:31 PM |
|
if you ask me i would suggest mycellium,i only use that...its quite good you can use it
|
|
|
|
|
|
