Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 01:16:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CHART] Bitcoin Inflation vs. Time  (Read 1050250 times)
alisa1990
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2016, 07:29:33 AM
 #521

Inflation should also have a certain impact on the bitcoin
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711674991
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711674991

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711674991
Reply with quote  #2

1711674991
Report to moderator
1711674991
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711674991

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711674991
Reply with quote  #2

1711674991
Report to moderator
1711674991
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711674991

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711674991
Reply with quote  #2

1711674991
Report to moderator
mmortal03
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1762
Merit: 1010


View Profile
August 01, 2016, 10:34:38 PM
 #522

Nobody cares about money supply except to the extent that it affects prices.
People will care when we reach the point where we can tell them that the US dollar is being printed at a faster rate than the bitcoin is being mined. Smiley

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe we've now reached this point, now that we're post 2nd halving. Smiley Bitcoin's monetary inflation rate is now lower than the US dollar's M1 inflation rate.  Not the same as price inflation, of course, but still an important event.
painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 03, 2016, 08:22:50 PM
 #523

For people interested in my charts I have just updated the https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17Jjhd_nnfRJ9EyYuOM1ACPMwRod3hhPqRk4YQp7FIZE/pubhtml BTC USD inflation v2

I have added a few charts comparing the initial schedule mining with the actual mining and the scheduled inflation over time with the actual.








painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 03, 2016, 08:27:00 PM
 #524

And for your amusement, here you can see the inflation halving on the chart (the orange line on the right)

painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 03, 2016, 08:43:09 PM
 #525

I added the USD M2 to the chart.
It is probably the money quantity influencing directly the living of people (costs of living / price inflation).

After the halving, for the first time, Bitcoin coinbase grow slower than M2.

The main problem limiting the price, now, is the number of transactions possible.
We will not go anywhere if the number of actual transactions don't grow.
At best, the value could grow slowly as most valuable transactions keep less valuable transactions from entering the blockchain (it become SWIFT instead of VISA).
Frodomaga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 11, 2016, 04:57:32 PM
Last edit: September 28, 2016, 03:13:34 PM by Frodomaga
 #526

I believe bitcoin is the future's money!  BTCBTCBTC                                                                                                                                                   
lotfiuser
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1247
Merit: 295

Palestine


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2016, 05:18:59 PM
 #527

u can expect price cuz defficultie change and miners change as earning

Free palestine
STT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3864
Merit: 1409


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2016, 03:19:41 AM
 #528

Quote
Obviously both "sides" believe their definition of inflation is the right one but it always leads to confusion and/or fights.  If everyone simply used the terms price inflation or money supply inflation it would always be clear.

There was only one definition before the Federal reserve was brought in 1913 and after that two definitions began with the monetary base obviously expanding in a simple relationship and so effecting prices and the government defined idea of inflation adjusted for various policies and ideas.
  Especially now with an unfixed worth to dollars, inflation is a variable description where as the original idea of reference to a known quality is the same as ever.   Seems like a reinvented word to me, you can take the spoken meaning slang or the original definition.
    Currently monetary base inflation is very high, much higher then GDP or population growth but the government inflation figure is very low.     The reason that matters is that inflation exceeds interest rates, debt repayment rates by government and companies and it exceeds the rates wages increase every year.  Inflation exceeds GDP growth which if correct would trigger the word recession and this is not an acceptable conclusion taught in current economics.  I think its very political and we view the world through a goldfish bowl to gain a certain perspective, large debt is valued over production.   Governments have large debts, unserviceable otherwise so every party agrees with this current view

I guess if someone tried to measure goods sold in bitcoin over time it could relate



The google graphs are a bit small but if you press ctrl and + it can make them a bit more readable

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 16, 2016, 04:13:25 PM
 #529


The google graphs are a bit small but if you press ctrl and + it can make them a bit more readable


When I work on them, I have them pretty large
I moved the charts back to a sheet instead of them on their own tab and now they appear large.
Hope this help.
mmortal03
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1762
Merit: 1010


View Profile
August 16, 2016, 09:33:40 PM
 #530


The google graphs are a bit small but if you press ctrl and + it can make them a bit more readable


When I work on them, I have them pretty large
I moved the charts back to a sheet instead of them on their own tab and now they appear large.
Hope this help.

Wow, now they're too large! We've got to find a happy medium on this. Good to see you figured out a way to solve the problem, though.
jvper
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 507


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 01:53:15 PM
 #531

I believe the velocity of money (btc in this case) matters here. Today it is extremely slow, since its usage is minimum.
painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 27, 2016, 06:40:25 PM
 #532

It is extremely low because you have just 250k tx/day top max.
Make them 250 M / day top and this would change a lot.
AndySt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1012


View Profile
August 29, 2016, 07:24:24 PM
 #533

I believe the velocity of money (btc in this case) matters here. Today it is extremely slow, since its usage is minimum.
I also agree with you that the rate will be higher than at this time, including the fact that the world economy can expect a big shock.
Benchman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 31, 2016, 08:38:44 AM
 #534

2025 year will be good for bitcoin.

Oh, at this time, block reward 'll be 3,2BTC.
Daniel2806
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 01, 2016, 03:16:35 PM
 #535

Thanks for this graphs! I suppose that situation around it could be better, but we will see what's going to happen with BTC. Only a matter of time.
XiongTyler
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
September 05, 2016, 09:32:43 AM
 #536

Great chart! Thank you! And you know Austrian Economics well.

Bixin!
.m.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 260



View Profile
September 05, 2016, 01:01:14 PM
 #537

I like data from painlord2k

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17Jjhd_nnfRJ9EyYuOM1ACPMwRod3hhPqRk4YQp7FIZE/pubhtml#




███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
DECENT
FOUNDATION



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██


[D]ecentralized application
[E]liminated third parties
[C]ontent distribution



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██


[E]ncrypted & secure
[N]o borders
[T]imeless reputation



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██

painlord2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 05, 2016, 02:54:26 PM
Last edit: September 05, 2016, 03:16:20 PM by painlord2k
 #538

Thank You for the appreciation.

Looking at the charts, I continue to see the USD M0 to continue to fall (slowly but steadily), where the M1 and M2 continue to rise.
Theoretically they should raise and fall together (give or take some lags).
What could cause the reverse?

1) The Fed is fudging the data and hiding money creation somewhere else
2) Someone is paying back his debts with the Feds reducing M0 and at the same time is using his liquidity to buy stuff and services raising the M1 and M2?
3) An Argentine situation where the money supply reduce but the trust in it reduce faster so people just spend their USD as fast as they can?
4) Something else entirely?
Oschoir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 05, 2016, 07:27:51 PM
 #539

I'm sure this question has been done to death but I haven't found an answer yet. Why do people talk so often about 2040 and 2140 as the estimated end date of the block subsidy? I had read 2140 in the early days and so took that number for granted. Andreas Antonopoulos uses 2140 in his book. Bank of England talk about 2040 in their papers as do many other people. I always assumed 2040 was typo. To settle it, I've made my own calcs.

Assuming exactly 4 years between each 210,000 milestone then the year 2105 is when the last subsidy will be mined according to me.
What am I missing?

The formula used:
https://i.imgur.com/zWrkjI4.jpg

And the table it produces:
https://i.imgur.com/xxVcKj5.jpg
Foxpup
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 3037


Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023


View Profile
September 06, 2016, 03:14:44 AM
 #540

Bank of England talk about 2040 in their papers as do many other people. I always assumed 2040 was typo.
It is.

What am I missing?
Your formulae are all wrong. The block subsidy (indeed, all bitcoin values) are an integer number of satoshis (hundred millionth parts of a bitcoin), and rounded down when they would be fractional, so column C should be =(FLOOR(C2*100000000/2))/100000000 and you shouldn't be rounding column E at all (and you should show 8 decimal places). Also, 210,000 blocks is slightly less than 4 years; at 10 minutes per block, it is 1,458 days and 8 hours. For reference, a correct table of block subsidies can be found here: en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply#Projected_Bitcoins_Long_Term

Will pretend to do unspeakable things (while actually eating a taco) for bitcoins: 1K6d1EviQKX3SVKjPYmJGyWBb1avbmCFM4
I am not on the scammers' paradise known as Telegram! Do not believe anyone claiming to be me off-forum without a signed message from the above address! Accept no excuses and make no exceptions!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!