Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[CY4NiDE]

Wow. Two in a row.

 

[COBRAS]

We Are In the Endgame Now  

why ? Previously then I share me walket.dst 10000 btc was deained, now I share my scrypt puz 130 drained, what is going on with me 


Need wait albertobsd bot info, does hi get puzle

[nomachine]

why ?

Because every next puzzle is more and more demanding.

Next puzzle is 135 

[ronin445]

this is not normal  
puzzle 66 and 130 solved in the same month

[COBRAS]

why ?

Because every next puzzle is more and more demanding.

but this is new wirld record, get DLP from 2^130 )))

bad new fool agree with you, but, need now check not in 1 pubkey, but in 2^5 pubkeys.

[Gord0nFreeman]

why the founder of Puzzle was transfered coins from 120 and from 125?

Where do you get that? Without any proof this is bullshit...

Just ask your self why the author of this challenge will move 1.2 and 12.5 bitcoins, when he increase all other puzzles in x10 factor? it wen from some 100 btc to near 1000

 

3Emiwzxme7Mrj4d89uqohXNncnRM15YESs https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/BTC/3Emiwzxme7Mrj4d89uqohXNncnRM15YESs
Because, likely, he wanted to make the community work on the lower bits, but without the private key. Maybe the solution provided by Kangaroo answered all the questions related to the vulnerability when revealing the pubkey... The funds from those wallets were transferred by one person to a single address. Do you really think that someone wealthy enough, who can afford not to touch the prize money from 120 and 125 bits, would bother solving the puzzle at all, let alone succeed twice?! It's nonsense to think otherwise in this case.

He also didn't even claim the Bitcoin Cash and others on that addresses... Very suspicious  

The Puzzle Creator is simply mocking the community. Supporting this is the fact that only one bot participated in the bot race! Do you really believe that everyone else on the planet turned off their bots, leaving just one, which ultimately "intercepted" the transaction? Plus, how did the original sender of the prize for Puzzle 66 know that the next block would be mined a minute after the prize was sent? Clearly, Puzzle 66 was exposed by the creator, who then intercepted it himself. After the revelation about Mara Pool, interest in the puzzle and creating bots significantly declined. As well as the absence of any victim on this forum who would be shouting that their winning bitcoins were intercepted! After all, if there were such a person, we could request their Twitter, and knowing their identity, it wouldn't be hard to establish a connection with the creator. There's also a bunch of defenders of the Puzzle Creator, probably hoping to get his favor and a few crumbs from him. Even AlbertoBSD reacts very painfully to any criticism directed at the Puzzle Creator... Don’t waste your money, time, and most importantly, your nerves on searching for something that doesn’t belong to you. We are like a donkey with a carrot dangling on a stick in front of its nose.

Now that the Creator has emptied Puzzle 130, does anyone still have doubts? Even if you rented tens of thousands of 4090s, it wouldn't be economically viable, even if you somehow knew or guessed whether the key was in the first or second half! It's likely that the current goal is to keep everyone busy searching for the lower bits, but trust me, it's not worth your time. Even Mara Pool isn't a guarantee that your transaction won’t be intercepted by a pool employee or those with access to the mempool!

[nomachine]

but this is new wirld record, get DLP from 2^130 )))

Either someone has 500 GPUs or has discovered a new algorithm.

Both scenarios are unlikely.

[COBRAS]

but this is new wirld record, get DLP from 2^130 )))

Either someone has 500 GPUs or discovered some new new algorithm.

looks like this is yours rng in multycore mode.Im read docs they write what this rng is good for multycore I think you not use all yours cores, bro. and  no good rng in kangaroo, rng is not brute fool range, someone in rng can get result faster(I think you understand why, and not need explain it)


500 gpu is not so many, and now 4090.... one 4090 like 50 tesla of 200 what use JLP


kangaro is not algorithm for solve 2^130 i think... ?

[nomachine]

looks like this is yours rng in multycore mode.Im read docs they write what this rng is good for multycore I think you not use all yours cores, bro.

And if that’s the case, you need to predict the exact range with minimal deviation. If anyone succeeds in that, all the puzzles will be solved soon.

[COBRAS]

looks like this is yours rng in multycore mode.Im read docs they write what this rng is good for multycore I think you not use all yours cores, bro.

And if that’s the case, you need to predict the exact range with minimal deviation. If anyone succeeds in that, all the puzzles will be solved soon.

no, if you random you can get mach faster then brute range and not slower then fool range, agree ?

anower wey generate random from bit patters what has puzzle privkeys, add "1" and "0" for spaces in patterns this will be solve too.

[Feron]

so today's computing power is able to solve 130 bits it's getting more and more interesting

[COBRAS]

looks like this is yours rng in multycore mode.Im read docs they write what this rng is good for multycore I think you not use all yours cores, bro.

And if that’s the case, you need to predict the exact range with minimal deviation. If anyone succeeds in that, all the puzzles will be solved soon.

too complex method I think, too complex methods not work as fom me

generate uniform distribution or another distribution may be moree goid result, then try to prefict ranges, but, I thin I can give you start of a ranges, but without right part(end of range)

we also can divide faster with your rng, get on of many what will be 2^^60 and brute 2^60 after.

... cold in New York outside, , therer start cold. My hands make mistakes then I write text in my phone

looks like this is yours rng in multycore mode.Im read docs they write what this rng is good for multycore I think you not use all yours cores, bro.

And if that’s the case, you need to predict the exact range with minimal deviation. If anyone succeeds in that, all the puzzles will be solved soon.

from what range you thant start ? My scruot what you help me make downgrade pubkey to 30 bits, from  2^130 to 2^100. Can you brute 2^100 fast ?


edit:

get full needed operations, or get more publeys and ><

edit:
in python I find 2^39 for
..804100000 operations.

[Danny29]

130 puzzle gone, just hour ago. Congrats to "Prestige" 1Prestige1zSYorBdz94KA2UbJW3hYLTn4.

[saeedxxx]

from what range you thant start ? My scruot what you help me make downgrade pubkey to 30 bits, from  2^130 to 2^100. Can you brute 2^100 fast ?
..

How do you downgrade keyspace from 2^130 to 2^100?

[COBRAS]

130 puzzle gone, just hour ago. Congrats to "Prestige" 1Prestige1zSYorBdz94KA2UbJW3hYLTn4.

looks like he is a rich man, he has many gpu's... Try crack his vanity, they are more cracable then simple adressess

[Feron]

do you know of a method to make 1000,000,000 public keys take up no more than 20MB of space in a text document?

[nomachine]

so today's computing power is able to solve 130 bits it's getting more and more interesting

I'm not sure that a normal person has so much hardware. It is unprofitable even if you are a multimillionaire.

[AlanJohnson]

so today's computing power is able to solve 130 bits it's getting more and more interesting

I'm not sure that a normal person has so much hardware. It is unprofitable even if you are a multimillionaire.

Maybe we are not aware of current state of quantum computing ...

Anyway for most of us it is the end now ... We can only watch...

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

I've been trying to solve puzzle 130 for two years now. 6 GPUs. The puzzle creator is kidding with us. Yes, we are all donkeys. 

[frozenen]

I guess finders are never gonna share solutions for 120, 125 and 130?
lol are you guys gonna try vanity 1Prestige1zSYorBdz94KA2UbJW3hYLTn4 instead of search 67?