Bitcoin Forum
June 09, 2026, 10:29:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 [675]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it  (Read 391665 times)
speed_user_113
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 07:38:20 PM
 #13481

I was thinking also on the sum of each puzzle and tx but there is a trick also.

To short the life of all BTC puzzles i paste here the formula used by creator. is 95% of work. have fun and take all the money from puzzles!

 x[n]   = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P


X[n] is the actual key tha you need

x[n-1] is the previous key
P is the biggest prime number in 256 bits
Offset i will not tell you guys. I will let you discover. Chat GPT will not help you at all for this offset. Smiley

This is my last post here. I solved all puzzles.

The creator is smart, but not smart enough.
8_2bp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 08:12:44 PM
 #13482

I was thinking also on the sum of each puzzle and tx but there is a trick also.

To short the life of all BTC puzzles i paste here the formula used by creator. is 95% of work. have fun and take all the money from puzzles!

 x[n]   = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P


X[n] is the actual key tha you need

x[n-1] is the previous key
P is the biggest prime number in 256 bits
Offset i will not tell you guys. I will let you discover. Chat GPT will not help you at all for this offset. Smiley

This is my last post here. I solved all puzzles.

The creator is smart, but not smart enough.
A short farewell note from this thread for now.

I'm done with the games on this forum. You delete posts without
reason, so I'm replying once more and stepping away for a while.

This post will probably also be removed as a "violation". But the
post I'm replying to apparently is not a violation, right?

So let's have these few minutes. Of course I'm documenting all of
this to show later how this community and moderation actually
function. Everything will be shown in due time.

To the user above who claims the creator is "smart but not smart
enough" - based on your post, you seem to be the one with
intelligence issues, in which case you don't reach the creator's
level by a long way. Your "formula" x[n] = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P
without revealing the offset is literally zero mathematical value.
That's a provocation, not a solution.

And one logical puzzle for you. Since you claim the creator wasn't
smart enough, you must be smarter than him, right? So why haven't
you solved the puzzle built by someone you consider less smart
than you? Have you ever thought about your own "intelligence"
that you think you have, but actually don't, because it's only a
state of mind?

That's what I want to show people. You think shallowly, only of
yourselves, repeating others' theses without backing them up,
thinking you deserve it because you have friends or history on
this forum. But that's exactly the difference. To truly smart
people, this is exactly how you look - the way I describe you
and the way I see you.

When I first entered this forum looking for information, I thought
I'd find something here. After these days I see the community is
like a cult promoting only its own GPU tools. Constructive
thinking is unwelcome here.

Good luck, smart gentlemen of GPU, judging the creator as less
intelligent than yourselves. Because he must have been so stupid
that you are so smart that you still haven't figured it out.

If I disappear, look me up online. The material is waiting.

Save this post, because it will disappear soon.

8_2bp
Bitcoin71
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 08:33:42 PM
 #13483


Save this post, because it will disappear soon.

8_2bp

SSBBRE1JUkUgWU9VIEtFRVAgSVQgT04u
speed_user_113
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 09:28:43 PM
 #13484

I said that i will not post, but with this guy you cannot resist.
The ideea is like this: you work 1-2 years for a solution and you do not find anything...you hope you can solve for 1-2 euro...when you are poor, you think only to get easy money.
Go to work and you will see.
This amount of money from here are dust in the wind...that's why i do not touch this keys because i am not interested in this...the amount is ttoo low.
You have no ideea who i am and what i do.

Giving you or anybody the offset, is similar to give for free all the puzzles.
There is a scope for this puzzles, there is a reason and also a business.
I know who is the creator and tge projects he do. "He"should keep his data safe on future before posting here as a noob account.

Soon the BTC will crash to 5k. Keep this info for the event date.

And soon a dormand wallet over 30000 BTC will cash out.

Good luck on little things and track my IP Smiley)
Bitcoin71
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 10:46:28 PM
 #13485


Giving you or anybody the offset, is similar to give for free all the puzzles.
There is a scope for this puzzles, there is a reason and also a business.
I know who is the creator and tge projects he do. "He"should keep his data safe on future before posting here as a noob account.


I think we have seen alot of you on this fourm Smiley
endut15
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 589
Merit: 100

ParaSwap


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2026, 11:11:03 PM
 #13486

I think the key point is that these puzzles are only possible because the private keys are inside limited ranges. Without that limitation, brute forcing a normal Bitcoin wallet is not realistic. For the unsolved ones, efficient range splitting and avoiding duplicated work probably matter more than just adding more hardware.

Grzegorz2022
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 08, 2026, 11:27:14 PM
 #13487

Seriously? Reading through this thread, I can't believe what I'm seeing. One person calls for Kangaroo, another presents magic formulas, a third promotes his book, a fourth has apparently already solved all the puzzles, and yet another sits here claiming these amounts are dust compared to what he holds. So where are the solved puzzles?
Where is the proof from those who claim to hold the answer?
I said it before, I thought this forum was for growing together, where each person through their own work would be rewarded when they solve a puzzle. Instead I still see the same thing: criticism, spam, AI-generated text, insults, promotion, everyone against everyone like a rat race.
Reading posts from the beginning of this thread, you could see people actually working. That ended somewhere along the way with the switch to Kangaroo. Now it's secret formulas, poetic verses, criticism in one word: Spam.
I respect those who show what they're working on, even without results yet. But I don't understand how someone can claim a discovery without proof, insisting it's the key to everything. Before you start persuading anyone show the formula. But not now! Wait until after you've solve the puzlle. Until then, your research is still research, not a proven solution.
The creator is definitely reading this thread and laughing at all of us, especially when we go at each other's throats. He created something that exists nowhere else, and x% of the world is trying to solve it.
John_Ahmet
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 6


View Profile
Today at 12:02:23 AM
 #13488

I was thinking also on the sum of each puzzle and tx but there is a trick also.

To short the life of all BTC puzzles i paste here the formula used by creator. is 95% of work. have fun and take all the money from puzzles!

 x[n]   = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P


X[n] is the actual key tha you need

x[n-1] is the previous key
P is the biggest prime number in 256 bits
Offset i will not tell you guys. I will let you discover. Chat GPT will not help you at all for this offset. Smiley

This is my last post here. I solved all puzzles.

The creator is smart, but not smart enough.

I developed some code for you. It produces these results on the first 21 keys. You might get an idea about offset, but I couldn't find a mathematical relationship.

The program first finds the largest prime number according to Fermat's theorem and then calculates the offset values ​​for the first 21 known keys.

Perhaps this work can give you some ideas.

Code:
using System.Numerics;

var bigPrime = BigInteger.Pow(2, 256);

var IsPrime = (BigInteger n) => { return BigInteger.ModPow(2, n, n) == 2; };

while (!IsPrime(bigPrime)) bigPrime--;

Console.WriteLine(bigPrime);
Console.WriteLine(bigPrime.ToString("X"));

BigInteger[] privKeys = { 0x1, 0x3, 0x7, 0x8, 0x15, 0x31, 0x4c, 0xe0, 0x1d3, 0x202, 0x483, 0xa7b, 0x1460, 0x2930, 0x68f3, 0xc936, 0x1764f, 0x3080d, 0x5749f, 0xd2c55, 0x1ba534 };

for(int i = 0; i < 21; i++)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Priv key: {0} Offset: {1}", privKeys[i], (i > 0 ? privKeys[i] - privKeys[i - 1] % bigPrime : 0));
}

Results:
Code:
115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639747
0FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF43
Priv key: 1 Offset: 0
Priv key: 3 Offset: 2
Priv key: 7 Offset: 4
Priv key: 8 Offset: 1
Priv key: 21 Offset: 13
Priv key: 49 Offset: 28
Priv key: 76 Offset: 27
Priv key: 224 Offset: 148
Priv key: 467 Offset: 243
Priv key: 514 Offset: 47
Priv key: 1155 Offset: 641
Priv key: 2683 Offset: 1528
Priv key: 5216 Offset: 2533
Priv key: 10544 Offset: 5328
Priv key: 26867 Offset: 16323
Priv key: 51510 Offset: 24643
Priv key: 95823 Offset: 44313
Priv key: 198669 Offset: 102846
Priv key: 357535 Offset: 158866
Priv key: 863317 Offset: 505782
Priv key: 1811764 Offset: 948447

Grzegorz2022
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 01:19:44 AM
 #13489

I was thinking also on the sum of each puzzle and tx but there is a trick also.

To short the life of all BTC puzzles i paste here the formula used by creator. is 95% of work. have fun and take all the money from puzzles!

 x[n]   = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P


X[n] is the actual key tha you need

x[n-1] is the previous key
P is the biggest prime number in 256 bits
Offset i will not tell you guys. I will let you discover. Chat GPT will not help you at all for this offset. Smiley

This is my last post here. I solved all puzzles.

The creator is smart, but not smart enough.

I developed some code for you. It produces these results on the first 21 keys. You might get an idea about offset, but I couldn't find a mathematical relationship.

The program first finds the largest prime number according to Fermat's theorem and then calculates the offset values ​​for the first 21 known keys.

Perhaps this work can give you some ideas.

Code:
using System.Numerics;

var bigPrime = BigInteger.Pow(2, 256);

var IsPrime = (BigInteger n) => { return BigInteger.ModPow(2, n, n) == 2; };

while (!IsPrime(bigPrime)) bigPrime--;

Console.WriteLine(bigPrime);
Console.WriteLine(bigPrime.ToString("X"));

BigInteger[] privKeys = { 0x1, 0x3, 0x7, 0x8, 0x15, 0x31, 0x4c, 0xe0, 0x1d3, 0x202, 0x483, 0xa7b, 0x1460, 0x2930, 0x68f3, 0xc936, 0x1764f, 0x3080d, 0x5749f, 0xd2c55, 0x1ba534 };

for(int i = 0; i < 21; i++)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Priv key: {0} Offset: {1}", privKeys[i], (i > 0 ? privKeys[i] - privKeys[i - 1] % bigPrime : 0));
}



To get the offsets you don't need code simple subtraction between consecutive keys gives the same result,
Fermat's little theorem states that for a prime p: a^(p−1) ≡ 1 (mod p), for a not divisible by p.
This is a necessary but not sufficient condition for primality.
The condition used in the code (2^n ≡ 2 mod n) is not Fermat's test it is a different modular congruence that only superficially resembles Fermat’s theorem
eggsylacer
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 02:41:21 AM
 #13490

Seriously? Reading through this thread, I can't believe what I'm seeing. One person calls for Kangaroo, another presents magic formulas, a third promotes his book, a fourth has apparently already solved all the puzzles, and yet another sits here claiming these amounts are dust compared to what he holds. So where are the solved puzzles?
Where is the proof from those who claim to hold the answer?
I said it before, I thought this forum was for growing together, where each person through their own work would be rewarded when they solve a puzzle. Instead I still see the same thing: criticism, spam, AI-generated text, insults, promotion, everyone against everyone like a rat race.
Reading posts from the beginning of this thread, you could see people actually working. That ended somewhere along the way with the switch to Kangaroo. Now it's secret formulas, poetic verses, criticism in one word: Spam.
I respect those who show what they're working on, even without results yet. But I don't understand how someone can claim a discovery without proof, insisting it's the key to everything. Before you start persuading anyone show the formula. But not now! Wait until after you've solve the puzlle. Until then, your research is still research, not a proven solution.
The creator is definitely reading this thread and laughing at all of us, especially when we go at each other's throats. He created something that exists nowhere else, and x% of the world is trying to solve it.

most likely, it's just 2-3 mentally ill people who are satisfied with all the fuss, while the rest of the people are calmly either solving problems or looking for solutions.
eggsylacer
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 02:48:14 AM
 #13491

I was thinking also on the sum of each puzzle and tx but there is a trick also.

To short the life of all BTC puzzles i paste here the formula used by creator. is 95% of work. have fun and take all the money from puzzles!

 x[n]   = (x[n-1] + offset) mod P


X[n] is the actual key tha you need

x[n-1] is the previous key
P is the biggest prime number in 256 bits
Offset i will not tell you guys. I will let you discover. Chat GPT will not help you at all for this offset. Smiley

This is my last post here. I solved all puzzles.

The creator is smart, but not smart enough.

Once again, there are no clear patterns in these key sequences. Of course, each subsequent key can "fit" the previous one, since each subsequent key is in a large range of 2^(n+1) keys
And24r
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 06:16:28 AM
 #13492

This prime number modulus is tricky… It’s fascinating how it seems to “encode” irrational numbers. I suspect this holds the key to the solution. Without the modulus, the curve is actually rather simple.
speed_user_113
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 06:39:49 AM
 #13493

There is something everybody should understand:
-you are not doctors in crypto, you do not have 2-3 university degree, you are too poor for this world trying to solce this puzxle and get those money.
Sorry for offense but this is the reality.

Everybody from here ask chat gpt or another AI and they are god in crypto...WAKE UP TO REALITY!!!

That formula is working and the trick is the offset formula.
There are 2-3 approaches and another formulas that is working only for 2 by 2, 3by 3 and 4 by4 steps. that can work and find the keys, but when you are limited, sorry you cannot do enough.

Everybody from here and 99% of world if found the key will take the money...this is the mentality of a poor man and poor education.
Think about how much money you make every month and what is your skills that you can improve to earn more money legally.

And yes i have all keys but i do not care about this....if anybody will be happy with those money, feel free to spent more time if your life for nothing.
CrabStick1
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 07:31:23 AM
 #13494

@speed_user_113
So if you have all the keys why you just not cash out one of the high-end puzzles like 155 or 160  where the pub.keys are known??? And then move the funds back if you don't care about the money ? Instead you are just showing your ego and smartness here....
GinnyBanzz
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 6


View Profile
Today at 10:03:45 AM
 #13495

There is something everybody should understand:
-you are not doctors in crypto, you do not have 2-3 university degree, you are too poor for this world trying to solce this puzxle and get those money.
Sorry for offense but this is the reality.

Everybody from here ask chat gpt or another AI and they are god in crypto...WAKE UP TO REALITY!!!

That formula is working and the trick is the offset formula.
There are 2-3 approaches and another formulas that is working only for 2 by 2, 3by 3 and 4 by4 steps. that can work and find the keys, but when you are limited, sorry you cannot do enough.

Everybody from here and 99% of world if found the key will take the money...this is the mentality of a poor man and poor education.
Think about how much money you make every month and what is your skills that you can improve to earn more money legally.

And yes i have all keys but i do not care about this....if anybody will be happy with those money, feel free to spent more time if your life for nothing.


You sound genuinely mentally ill, you should get help son.
Pages: « 1 ... 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 [675]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!