|
Empinel (OP)
|
 |
January 09, 2016, 02:39:46 PM
Last edit: February 16, 2018, 03:56:34 PM by Empinel |
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
junbi39
|
|
January 09, 2016, 02:47:40 PM |
|
nice
what is the current coin supply?
|
|
|
|
|
kcanup
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 09, 2016, 03:10:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
notsofast
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1517
Merit: 1042
@notsofast
|
|
January 09, 2016, 04:16:57 PM |
|
It was a SuperNet member, and before that, a BlockNet member.
It may be of value to you to join the BlockNet slack and see if it's worth reintegrating. I know BlockNet is in their long, slow development plateau and you both might be able to benefit from reintegration.
Definitely don't bring PoW back.
I think there's a very good chance for revival for this coin.
|
twitter.com/notsofast
|
|
|
|
SockPuppetAccount
|
|
January 09, 2016, 04:25:17 PM |
|
Hmmmm.......why do I get the sneaking suspicion that you are that Indian kid who did the Crave takeover?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Empinel (OP)
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:27:10 PM |
|
It was a SuperNet member, and before that, a BlockNet member.
It may be of value to you to join the BlockNet slack and see if it's worth reintegrating. I know BlockNet is in their long, slow development plateau and you both might be able to benefit from reintegration.
Definitely don't bring PoW back.
I think there's a very good chance for revival for this coin.
Sure. what's their invite page? |
|
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:32:12 PM |
|
I will ask some questions for the community:
>>0) Do you want PoW Back?
No
>>2) Do you think this coin has any chance of revival
Yes
3) Has the developer done any premine which you think isn't justified
No
|
|
|
|
|
notsofast
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1517
Merit: 1042
@notsofast
|
|
January 09, 2016, 09:38:30 PM |
|
Hmmmm.......why do I get the sneaking suspicion that you are that Indian kid who did the Crave takeover?
Nah man Empinel is not Niitassin the kid |
twitter.com/notsofast
|
|
|
|
Empinel (OP)
|
|
January 10, 2016, 11:07:06 AM |
|
It was a SuperNet member, and before that, a BlockNet member.
It may be of value to you to join the BlockNet slack and see if it's worth reintegrating. I know BlockNet is in their long, slow development plateau and you both might be able to benefit from reintegration.
Definitely don't bring PoW back.
I think there's a very good chance for revival for this coin.
Thank you for your answers. Is SuperNET okay if we reintegrate with BlockNET?
I will ask some questions for the community:
>>0) Do you want PoW Back?
No
>>2) Do you think this coin has any chance of revival
Yes
3) Has the developer done any premine which you think isn't justified
No
Thank you for your answer |
|
|
|
|
notsofast
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1517
Merit: 1042
@notsofast
|
|
January 10, 2016, 02:25:35 PM |
|
Thank you for your answers. Is SuperNET okay if we reintegrate with BlockNET?
I don't think there would be harm. The two services have a similar goal-- designing a protocol for integration of different blockchains-- but they're going about it very differently. It might be very advantageous for Fibre to be part of both. If the Fibre blockchain were to be the integrating link between BlockNet and SuperNet, it would be a huge driver of value for Fibre. |
twitter.com/notsofast
|
|
|
|
Empinel (OP)
|
|
January 10, 2016, 05:06:11 PM |
|
Thank you for your answers. Is SuperNET okay if we reintegrate with BlockNET?
I don't think there would be harm. The two services have a similar goal-- designing a protocol for integration of different blockchains-- but they're going about it very differently. It might be very advantageous for Fibre to be part of both. If the Fibre blockchain were to be the integrating link between BlockNet and SuperNet, it would be a huge driver of value for Fibre. Well, we can't tell until we try. Also, apparently - someone is already heading the coin AFAIK, I need to checkout what's going one |
|
|
|
|
|
Empinel (OP)
|
|
January 16, 2016, 12:24:48 PM |
|
Well, due to the fact I am still in the process of Aquiring the entire codebase and it's already being leaded, I am not in a position to do so
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASdaq
|
|
January 18, 2016, 03:52:44 AM |
|
Well, due to the fact I am still in the process of Aquiring the entire codebase and it's already being leaded, I am not in a position to do so
huh ... are you talking about blocknet/supernet or fibre? afaik fibre was already a supernet core coin |
|
|
|
|
Bitcat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 21, 2016, 10:16:57 AM |
|
I'm not a developer, just a crypto fan and investor. On a positive note, I just wanted to say that I like the FIBRE concept and the way the wallet looks and works. I've never had any problems with it and I also like the fact that I get paid some FIBRE just after having switched it on and synced it up, which never takes very long, unlike many others. The wallet itself looks awesome and I think it's the coolest looking wallet design in crypto, and I have more than a few of them. I like the Fibre Connect idea too, even though I've never had an opportunity to use it yet, and I also like the idea that you can communicate privately and securely. To the devs, whomever they are or may be in the future, please keep up the good work and keep this coin going. And to the community, please don't give up on it as I believe that FIBRE, along with crypto in general, will have it's day to shine. Remember this is still very embryonic early days for crypto! Now I'm off to Poloniex to buy some more  |
|
|
|
|
|
arbitrage
|
|
January 21, 2016, 11:08:34 AM |
|
Fibre has always been attractive it's cheaper than cheaper cant be!
But only if there is some activity and development.
Who is new Dev, is this legitimate topic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Empinel (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2016, 04:36:07 PM |
|
I am working on the code but the leader still stands, therefore I will conclude this thread with a huge thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
