Vanillacoin's Chainblender: Technical analyse

[smooth]

My main grip with John Conner is he doesn't put all the technical details in a white paper, because he is apparently wants to avoid peer review.

Could it be John doesn't put all the technical details in his whitepaper because people would just shameless copy-paste his technology?

Irony meter just exploded

[TPTB_need_war]

On a sidenote people need to understand that not only 100% anonimity sollution can be viable as ringsigs for example, anything coming close to the 99% range is good enough if it can solve bloat and speed issues for real world use compatibility. Numbers are examples obv.

Anything less than 100% is worthless IMO. It only takes one crack in the design and suddenly everything is onymous again.

Show me how you would deanonymize ChainBlender. It might not be the most advanced sollution in your eyes (compared to something like zerocash - which is still vapor), but if it works and if its fast and if it doesn't do bloat, it's good enough for real world use.

Why should I bother? Are you paying me?

I will be trying to earn the $300+ per hour that smooth can earn instead of wasting my time on fools.

[traumschiff]

On a sidenote people need to understand that not only 100% anonimity sollution can be viable as ringsigs for example, anything coming close to the 99% range is good enough if it can solve bloat and speed issues for real world use compatibility. Numbers are examples obv.

Anything less than 100% is worthless IMO. It only takes one crack in the design and suddenly everything is onymous again.

Show me how you would deanonymize ChainBlender. It might not be the most advanced sollution in your eyes (compared to something like zerocash - which is still vapor), but if it works and if its fast and if it doesn't do bloat, it's good enough for real world use.

Why should I bother? Are you paying me?

I will be trying to earn the $300+ per hour that smooth can earn instead of wasting my time on fools.

Does theymos pay you 300$/hr to use spam bitcointalk? Sign me up.

[crypto jerk]

Dang it smooth, beat me to it.

But a dev accused of plagiarism who is afraid of being plagarized is quite funny.

My main grip with John Conner is he doesn't put all the technical details in a white paper, because he is apparently wants to avoid peer review.

Could it be John doesn't put all the technical details in his whitepaper because people would just shameless copy-paste his technology?

Irony meter just exploded

[Nxtblg]

But a dev accused of plagiarism who is afraid of being plagarized is quite funny.

Much like a revolutionary who stomps on folks he considers insurrectionist.