Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 09:21:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 197 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LOCKED] cpuminer-opt v3.12.3, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner  (Read 443960 times)
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 09:33:12 PM
 #1921

looks gooad an simple , but all the instructions works togeher as mentonied ?

this one im not sure  "cpuminer-aes-sse42"    but you are the experts

until now i was not able to compile  the amd´s with ss2,sse3 support on cpuminer-opt   thats why im using epsylon´s miner

Post your compile errors and i'll look into it, -marh=native works for Intel but AMD is trickier. The key features
in decreasing performance: AVX2, AVX, AES, SSE4.2, SSE2. Choose the best that will compile and run, AES needs
to be specified seperately, is "-maes -msse4.2", "-maes -mavx".

AES-SSE42 is the difference between the first Nehalem that didn't have AES and Westmere that did. How that maps
to AMD is unknown to me. It will be trial and error. Felix may be able to help as he is an AMD user, though he doesn't
compile.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713907298
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713907298

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713907298
Reply with quote  #2

1713907298
Report to moderator
1713907298
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713907298

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713907298
Reply with quote  #2

1713907298
Report to moderator
1713907298
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713907298

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713907298
Reply with quote  #2

1713907298
Report to moderator
integrale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


Eager to learn


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 09:34:19 PM
Last edit: February 12, 2017, 09:48:24 PM by integrale
 #1922

ok , thanks i will do

Makefile:2451: die Regel für Ziel „algo/echo/aes_ni/cpuminer-hash.o“ scheiterte
make[2]: *** [algo/echo/aes_ni/cpuminer-hash.o] Fehler 1
make[2]: *** Auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse wird gewartet …
mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po
mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl.Po
mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po
make[2]: Verzeichnis „/home/boss/joblo6“ wird verlassen
Makefile:3496: die Regel für Ziel „all-recursive“ scheiterte
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verzeichnis „/home/boss/joblo6“ wird verlassen
Makefile:671: die Regel für Ziel „all“ scheiterte
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
strip: ‚cpuminer‛: Keine solche Datei
boss@boss-MS-7253:~/joblo6$

cpu is Athlon 64 x2 5600+ with nstruction set extensions   
MMX
SSE
SSE2
3DNow!
SSE3

same error on all other amd i own athlon II x250 , 64x2 4200+

AltCoin-Mining @ Xubuntu 16.04 LTS
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 09:56:54 PM
 #1923

ok , thanks i will do

Makefile:2451: die Regel für Ziel „algo/echo/aes_ni/cpuminer-hash.o“ scheiterte
make[2]: *** [algo/echo/aes_ni/cpuminer-hash.o] Fehler 1
make[2]: *** Auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse wird gewartet …
mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po
mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl.Po
mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po
make[2]: Verzeichnis „/home/boss/joblo6“ wird verlassen
Makefile:3496: die Regel für Ziel „all-recursive“ scheiterte
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verzeichnis „/home/boss/joblo6“ wird verlassen
Makefile:671: die Regel für Ziel „all“ scheiterte
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
strip: ‚cpuminer‛: Keine solche Datei
boss@boss-MS-7253:~/joblo6$

cpu is Athlon 64 x2 5600+ with nstruction set extensions   
MMX
SSE
SSE2
3DNow!
SSE3

same error on all other amd i own athlon II x250 , 64x2 4200+

What options did you compile with? You might have to help with the translation.
I noticed this "algo/echo/aes" in the text. If this is where the error occurred your
cpu does not have aes. Try compiling with -msse3, if that doesn't work -msse2.
It shouldn't make a difference.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
integrale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


Eager to learn


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:09:15 PM
 #1924

im just used builtin script    ./build.sh   after its finish with error  change is neede from " march-native" to msse2   am im right , means i have to edit it by hand ?

AltCoin-Mining @ Xubuntu 16.04 LTS
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:25:15 PM
 #1925

im just used builtin script    ./build.sh   after its finish with error  change is neede from " march-native" to msse2   am im right , means i have to edit it by hand ?


You don't have to edit the script, just enter the commands manually.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046



View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:30:35 PM
 #1926

Thank you Joblo for the 3.5.6 release.
I compiled it with the build.sh and Ubuntu 16.04 : all works fine.
I use it for ZCoin and all is ok :-).

Is there a possibility to ask in the command line for a particular difficulty and staying allways at this difficulty ?
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:37:03 PM
 #1927

Thank you Joblo for the 3.5.6 release.
I compiled it with the build.sh and Ubuntu 16.04 : all works fine.
I use it for ZCoin and all is ok :-).

Is there a possibility to ask in the command line for a particular difficulty and staying allways at this difficulty ?

I don't know if the command line diff really does anything useful. Some pools allow diff as a password paramter or
offer a different port for different diff. In most pools vardiff usually works well adusting automatically.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ZenFr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046



View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:39:11 PM
 #1928

Thank you Joblo for the 3.5.6 release.
I compiled it with the build.sh and Ubuntu 16.04 : all works fine.
I use it for ZCoin and all is ok :-).

Is there a possibility to ask in the command line for a particular difficulty and staying allways at this difficulty ?

I don't know if the command line diff really does anything useful. Some pools allow diff as a password paramter or
offer a different port for different diff. In most pools vardiff usually works well adusting automatically.
Ok, thank you again :-).
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:51:21 PM
 #1929


cpuminer-sse2.exe
cpuminer-sse42.exe
cpuminer-aes-sse42.exe
cpuminer-aes-avx.exe
cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe

It's actually sse4.2 not 4.1, I just checked.


And so it shall be. These will be the names of the Windows binaries in the next release.
The included README.txt file will have descriptions to help.

Prepare your scripts.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 10:55:28 PM
 #1930

It nearly want you to have a loader that will analyze your current CPU capability and use the proper exe  Grin so many of them  Shocked
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 11:23:57 PM
 #1931

It nearly want you to have a loader that will analyze your current CPU capability and use the proper exe  Grin so many of them  Shocked

I do the best I can. The startup messages are really important to make sure you're getting the best performance,
and can explain crashes. You want the CPU and SW features to match and the algo will choose the best it can.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 11:34:33 PM
 #1932

I just pushed an update to git for the aclocal.m4 issue causing compile problems
when cloned from git. Those who have run into this problem may find it easier to
compile. It was supposed to be in 3.5.6 but got lost in one of my many resets this release.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 01:50:28 AM
 #1933

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 02:08:16 AM
 #1934

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?

Your choice.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 02:16:07 AM
 #1935

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?

Your choice.

Let me rephase by which coins currently offer the best ROI? Or are none of them worth mining as it will cost more for electricity? How comparable are current AMD CPUs compared to Intel and will there be optimizations for Ryzen?
joblo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 02:28:57 AM
 #1936

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?

Your choice.

Let me rephase by which coins currently offer the best ROI? Or are none of them worth mining as it will cost more for electricity? How comparable are current AMD CPUs compared to Intel and will there be optimizations for Ryzen?

Intel leads the way with vectored (SIMD) instructions, AVX2 being the best so far. I have heard annecdotally that AMDs don't
perform as well as Intel with vectored instructions. Ryzen looks like a pretty high end CPUs and it's a new architecture
so it may have improved. But no one really knows yet. Tell us when you get yours and try it out.

Many CPU friendly coins aren't compute bound so faster CPU and optimized vectorization doesn't always help.
Memory bandwith and cache size have become the bottlenecks to higher speed, If the Ryzen has 4 channel memory
and a larger cache it could help.

AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 02:33:28 AM
 #1937

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?

Your choice.

Let me rephase by which coins currently offer the best ROI? Or are none of them worth mining as it will cost more for electricity? How comparable are current AMD CPUs compared to Intel and will there be optimizations for Ryzen?

Intel leads the way with vectored (SIMD) instructions, AVX2 being the best so far. I have heard annecdotally that AMDs don't
perform as well as Intel with vectored instructions. Ryzen looks like a pretty high end CPUs and it's a new architecture
so it may have improved. But no one really knows yet. Tell us when you get yours and try it out.

Many CPU friendly coins aren't compute bound so faster CPU and optimized vectorization doesn't always help.
Memory bandwith and cache size have become the bottlenecks to higher speed, If the Ryzen has 4 channel memory
and a larger cache it could help.

Alright. I sold my ZEC to preorder Ryzen so I will report back when it arrives.
forzendiablo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000


the grandpa of cryptos


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 02:42:02 AM
 #1938

subscribed here!

yolo
felixbrucker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2017, 02:45:17 AM
 #1939

I'm planning on upgrading to the AMD Ryzen R7-1800X next month so which coins should I look to mine?

Your choice.

Let me rephase by which coins currently offer the best ROI? Or are none of them worth mining as it will cost more for electricity? How comparable are current AMD CPUs compared to Intel and will there be optimizations for Ryzen?

Intel leads the way with vectored (SIMD) instructions, AVX2 being the best so far. I have heard annecdotally that AMDs don't
perform as well as Intel with vectored instructions. Ryzen looks like a pretty high end CPUs and it's a new architecture
so it may have improved. But no one really knows yet. Tell us when you get yours and try it out.

Many CPU friendly coins aren't compute bound so faster CPU and optimized vectorization doesn't always help.
Memory bandwith and cache size have become the bottlenecks to higher speed, If the Ryzen has 4 channel memory
and a larger cache it could help.

Alright. I sold my ZEC to preorder Ryzen so I will report back when it arrives.

your feedback is welcome, it'll be interesting to see ryzen mining speeds
ryen123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 05:37:54 AM
 #1940

v3.5.6 Lyra2 doesn't work. Miner starts and quit within seconds. Tested on nicehash.

Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 197 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!