Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2018, 02:16:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 190 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.8.8.1, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner  (Read 416671 times)
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1075


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2016, 02:32:24 AM
 #181

i didnt trace to understand but xmr rejects the shares..

else i also use fedora 22 and 23, not yet centos... and ive an ubuntu 15.10 but dont really like it and some Slackware usb sticks Smiley

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
1542204985
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542204985

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542204985
Reply with quote  #2

1542204985
Report to moderator
1542204985
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542204985

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542204985
Reply with quote  #2

1542204985
Report to moderator
1542204985
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542204985

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542204985
Reply with quote  #2

1542204985
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542204985
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542204985

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542204985
Reply with quote  #2

1542204985
Report to moderator
1542204985
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542204985

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542204985
Reply with quote  #2

1542204985
Report to moderator
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 02:46:58 AM
 #182

i didnt trace to understand but xmr rejects the shares..

else i also use fedora 22 and 23, not yet centos... and ive an ubuntu 15.10 but dont really like it and some Slackware usb sticks Smiley

I pulled support for cryptonight at the last minute because I broke it. Use Wolf0's for now.
Yeah I know I promissed. Oh well.

Slackware? Old school.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1075


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2016, 02:55:10 AM
 #183

not exactly : http://ccminer.org/slackex/

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 03:11:06 AM
 #184


Cool. I didn't mean slack was obsolete, just that people who like it are old school.
I've played with it but never any real work. At one time I had 8 different distros
multibooted on 2 20GB HDDs running on a pentium 1. Now the're all in VMs.

A guy I used to work with was a slackware fan. Give him the keyboard, toss the mouse,
and he could do magic. He's was also pretty sharp in networking, knew his protocols
inside out.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 150



View Profile
January 26, 2016, 05:32:03 AM
 #185

As for the Ubuntu 15.10 I think it really depends on what version of it you get GNOME "Willy Wolf"  version VS the Ubuntu Desktop
version you get from the Ubuntu main web page. I found the Gnome Desktop version to work much better than the one I got from
there main site with the purple background vs Blue background with the Willy Wolf version. The one with the purple back ground is
very laggy especially once the miners is started, but not so with the other version & each was setup the same with VM.


Edit: Just to correct this...
Turns out it wasn't the software but what options are picked at install that causes the lag!  Roll Eyes
Don't pick anything extra at the format of the HDD screen and all should be fine.
One of the options was changing how the HDD was formatted & its lay out.

I'm resetting the 1st 3 I setup now with the Willy Wolf version, on number 2 at the moment & almost done with it then,
on to the other two if all works the same as the first version did on this one rig.

Edit: Packages I have to install in order for it to compile:

sudo apt-get install libssl-dev

sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev

sudo apt-get install g++

Just a side note for anyone compiling this. I don't think the order matters in which each is
installed this is what I have to do on the systems I have setup so far.
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 08:05:56 AM
 #186


Edit: Packages I have to install in order for it to compile:

sudo apt-get install libssl-dev

sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev

sudo apt-get install g++

Just a side note for anyone compiling this. I don't think the order matters in which each is
installed this is what I have to do on the systems I have setup so far.

Thanks, I'll add that to the build instructions in the next release.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 150



View Profile
January 26, 2016, 08:35:29 AM
 #187

Numbers are looking very good on the 3 I have setup with v3.03.
2xSR2 have 24 cores if you count HT cores 1xSR2 has 20 cores counting HT. "E5620+E5645 CPU"

Stock Clock 3.2GHz 1002 KH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 24 cores. No mining video cards.

OC 3.33Ghz 924.80 kH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 22 cores. 2x R270 and why I left 2 unused by the VM. << should get a little better numbers once I set this one full 24 cores.

OC 3.6Ghz 790 KH/s 17 of 20 cores used in the command line VB set to 20 cores. 2x R270x
 
I've found odd numbers with some free cores seems to give just a little better KH/s.
the free cores helps keep my video cards running at there max MH/s. Full load on all
CPU cores hurts the video cards & no real improvement to the CPU scores either.
This is due to running in a VBox, learned this back with Folding@Home, so nothing new there.
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 08:53:39 AM
 #188

Numbers are looking very good on the 3 I have setup with v3.03.
2xSR2 have 24 cores if you count HT cores 1xSR2 has 20 cores counting HT. "E5620+E5645 CPU"

3.2GHz 1002 KH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 24 cores. No mining video cards.

3.33Ghz 924.80 kH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 22 cores. 2x R270 and why I left 2 unused by the VM. << should get a little better numbers once I set this one full 24 cores.

3.6Ghz 790 KH/s 17 of 20 cores used in the command line VB set to 20 cores. 2x R270x
 
I've found odd numbers with some free cores seems to give just a little better KH/s.
the free cores helps keep my video cards running at there max MH/s. Full load on all
CPU cores hurts the video cards & no real improvement to the CPU scores either.
This is due to running in a VBox, learned this back with Folding@Home, so nothing new there.


Thanks for posting your results. Running all cores does afffect GPU performance on the same machine
and we don't want to do that. It's also cool you can do it in a VM.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 08:55:50 AM
 #189


Mining with an Intel GPU? I need to look into that.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 150



View Profile
January 26, 2016, 09:02:00 AM
 #190

Numbers are looking very good on the 3 I have setup with v3.03.
2xSR2 have 24 cores if you count HT cores 1xSR2 has 20 cores counting HT. "E5620+E5645 CPU"

3.2GHz 1002 KH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 24 cores. No mining video cards.

3.33Ghz 924.80 kH/s 21 of 24 cores used in the command line VB set to 22 cores. 2x R270 and why I left 2 unused by the VM. << should get a little better numbers once I set this one full 24 cores.

3.6Ghz 790 KH/s 17 of 20 cores used in the command line VB set to 20 cores. 2x R270x
 
I've found odd numbers with some free cores seems to give just a little better KH/s.
the free cores helps keep my video cards running at there max MH/s. Full load on all
CPU cores hurts the video cards & no real improvement to the CPU scores either.
This is due to running in a VBox, learned this back with Folding@Home, so nothing new there.


Thanks for posting your results. Running all cores does afffect GPU performance on the same machine
and we don't want to do that. It's also cool you can do it in a VM.

Even on the one I don't use a video card to mine on you will never get a true 100% load on all CPU
cores while running in a VB about 89% is max load you can get threw a VB.
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1087


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 09:13:33 AM
 #191


Cool. I didn't mean slack was obsolete, just that people who like it are old school.
I've played with it but never any real work. At one time I had 8 different distros
multibooted on 2 20GB HDDs running on a pentium 1. Now the're all in VMs.

A guy I used to work with was a slackware fan. Give him the keyboard, toss the mouse,
and he could do magic. He's was also pretty sharp in networking, knew his protocols
inside out.

I started using Linux with Slackware 2.0 :-)

pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1087


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 09:20:35 AM
 #192

Is it correct that "SSE2: No"?
AFAICS, it runs fast anyway.

Checking CPU capatibility...
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz
AES_NI: No.
SSE2: No, start mining without optimizations...

[2016-01-26 10:17:55] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] 4 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] Stratum difficulty set to 0.016
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 1821843
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 108239
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #1: 57.09 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #0: 56.81 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #2: 53.73 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:02] CPU #3: 52.40 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #0: 56.23 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #3: 53.29 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #1: 56.55 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #2: 56.11 kH/s

zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 150



View Profile
January 26, 2016, 09:21:41 AM
 #193

Forgot to mention the numbers I last posted are from mining x11. More numbers coming I'll just add to this post.

System: EVGA SR2 Intel x2 OC 3.3Ghz 21 cores in VB

x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339
[2016-01-26 03:37:10] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 412.61 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:37:17] CPU #15: 19.77 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:37:17] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 412.80 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:37:30] CPU #0: 19.72 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:37:30] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 413.08 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:37:33] CPU #6: 19.66 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:37:33] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 413.08 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:37:35] CPU #18: 19.68 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:37:37] Stratum difficulty set to 0.01
[2016-01-26 03:37:37] x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 x15 block 85823

quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345
[2016-01-26 03:40:46] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 881.24 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:40:59] CPU #2: 42.48 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:40:59] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 880.33 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:41:03] CPU #11: 42.58 kH/s
[2016-01-26 03:41:03] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 881.15 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 03:41:10] Stratum difficulty set to 0.02

x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337
[2016-01-26 10:20:38] accepted: 159/159 (100.00%), 480.78 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-26 10:21:23] x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 x13 block 875258


Oh well looks like NiceHash server went off line, I'll do more test at a later time.
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 10:16:21 AM
 #194

Is it correct that "SSE2: No"?
AFAICS, it runs fast anyway.

Checking CPU capatibility...
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz
AES_NI: No.
SSE2: No, start mining without optimizations...

[2016-01-26 10:17:55] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] 4 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] Stratum difficulty set to 0.016
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 1821843
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 108239
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #1: 57.09 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #0: 56.81 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #2: 53.73 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:02] CPU #3: 52.40 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #0: 56.23 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #3: 53.29 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #1: 56.55 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #2: 56.11 kH/s


Nope, it's a bug. I think it will be irelevant when I implement X86_64 compiling.
But  "-march=x86_64" won't configure. I don't know if it's the wrong target name or
if GCC has dumped support for it. Maybe I need to install some compat packages.  

Edit: just checking your output again. even though it says no for SSE2 it should
still the SSE2 kernel. Formyour hashrate it appears to be normal for  and i5 SSE2.
I guess the early corei didn't have AES_NI. Do you want to give it try to make sure?
Just edit cpu-miner.c:1949 and hardcode cpu_aesni=true. Then compile with AES_NI
enabled and let me know if it works.

Thanks

Edit2: I intalled the x86_64 cross compiler and it still doesn;t work.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 10:41:19 AM
 #195


Mining with an Intel GPU? I need to look into that.

No source? I want to import the Intel GPU mining. I wanna expand my territory.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1087


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 10:57:24 AM
 #196

Is it correct that "SSE2: No"?
AFAICS, it runs fast anyway.

Checking CPU capatibility...
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz
AES_NI: No.
SSE2: No, start mining without optimizations...

[2016-01-26 10:17:55] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] 4 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] Stratum difficulty set to 0.016
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 1821843
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 108239
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #1: 57.09 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #0: 56.81 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #2: 53.73 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:02] CPU #3: 52.40 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #0: 56.23 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #3: 53.29 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #1: 56.55 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #2: 56.11 kH/s


Nope, it's a bug. I think it will be irelevant when I implement X86_64 compiling.
But  "-march=x86_64" won't configure. I don't know if it's the wrong target name or
if GCC has dumped support for it. Maybe I need to install some compat packages.  

Edit: just checking your output again. even though it says no for SSE2 it should
still the SSE2 kernel. Formyour hashrate it appears to be normal for  and i5 SSE2.
I guess the early corei didn't have AES_NI. Do you want to give it try to make sure?
Just edit cpu-miner.c:1949 and hardcode cpu_aesni=true. Then compile with AES_NI
enabled and let me know if it works.

Thanks

It doesn't support AES, it's a Nehalem.
I think the miner should be compiled with the best "-march" as it will impact the performance of most kernels, regardless how far your optimisations will go.
On a side note, I've found out that -march=native may lead to slower binaries than -march=<the best for your cpu>

joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 11:04:25 AM
 #197

Is it correct that "SSE2: No"?
AFAICS, it runs fast anyway.

Checking CPU capatibility...
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz
AES_NI: No.
SSE2: No, start mining without optimizations...

[2016-01-26 10:17:55] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] 4 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] Stratum difficulty set to 0.016
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 1821843
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 108239
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #1: 57.09 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #0: 56.81 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #2: 53.73 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:02] CPU #3: 52.40 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #0: 56.23 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #3: 53.29 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #1: 56.55 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #2: 56.11 kH/s


Nope, it's a bug. I think it will be irelevant when I implement X86_64 compiling.
But  "-march=x86_64" won't configure. I don't know if it's the wrong target name or
if GCC has dumped support for it. Maybe I need to install some compat packages.  

Edit: just checking your output again. even though it says no for SSE2 it should
still the SSE2 kernel. Formyour hashrate it appears to be normal for  and i5 SSE2.
I guess the early corei didn't have AES_NI. Do you want to give it try to make sure?
Just edit cpu-miner.c:1949 and hardcode cpu_aesni=true. Then compile with AES_NI
enabled and let me know if it works.

Thanks

It doesn't support AES, it's a Nehalem.
I think the miner should be compiled with the best "-march" as it will impact the performance of most kernels, regardless how far your optimisations will go.
On a side note, I've found out that -march=native may lead to slower binaries than -march=<the best for your cpu>

AFAIK corei7-avx is tops do you know of anything better?

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 11:05:38 AM
 #198

Is it correct that "SSE2: No"?
AFAICS, it runs fast anyway.

Checking CPU capatibility...
        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         760  @ 2.80GHz
AES_NI: No.
SSE2: No, start mining without optimizations...

[2016-01-26 10:17:55] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] 4 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] Stratum difficulty set to 0.016
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 1821843
[2016-01-26 10:17:56] hashpower.co:3533 x11 block 108239
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #1: 57.09 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #0: 56.81 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:01] CPU #2: 53.73 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:02] CPU #3: 52.40 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #0: 56.23 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #3: 53.29 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #1: 56.55 kH/s
[2016-01-26 10:18:18] CPU #2: 56.11 kH/s


Nope, it's a bug. I think it will be irelevant when I implement X86_64 compiling.
But  "-march=x86_64" won't configure. I don't know if it's the wrong target name or
if GCC has dumped support for it. Maybe I need to install some compat packages.  

Edit: just checking your output again. even though it says no for SSE2 it should
still the SSE2 kernel. Formyour hashrate it appears to be normal for  and i5 SSE2.
I guess the early corei didn't have AES_NI. Do you want to give it try to make sure?
Just edit cpu-miner.c:1949 and hardcode cpu_aesni=true. Then compile with AES_NI
enabled and let me know if it works.

Thanks

I intalled the x86_64 cross compiler and it still doesn't work.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
joblo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 11:20:45 AM
 #199


Cool. I didn't mean slack was obsolete, just that people who like it are old school.
I've played with it but never any real work. At one time I had 8 different distros
multibooted on 2 20GB HDDs running on a pentium 1. Now the're all in VMs.

A guy I used to work with was a slackware fan. Give him the keyboard, toss the mouse,
and he could do magic. He's was also pretty sharp in networking, knew his protocols
inside out.

I started using Linux with Slackware 2.0 :-)

RH 5.2 for me, bought the CDs. I discovered Slack around v5 or 6, when PV was sick
and out of action for a while.

cpuminer-opt developer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0
BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
ETH: 0x72122edabcae9d3f57eab0729305a425f6fef6d0
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1087


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 11:50:36 AM
 #200

It doesn't support AES, it's a Nehalem.
I think the miner should be compiled with the best "-march" as it will impact the performance of most kernels, regardless how far your optimisations will go.
On a side note, I've found out that -march=native may lead to slower binaries than -march=<the best for your cpu>

AFAIK corei7-avx is tops do you know of anything better?

The best is your right chipset name:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 190 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!