Sir William
Member

Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 11
|
 |
February 25, 2018, 08:28:59 PM |
|
Any chance to get the equihash algorithm added? I'm still using nheqminer for my cpu.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
February 25, 2018, 09:02:43 PM |
|
Any chance to get the equihash algorithm added? I'm still using nheqminer for my cpu.
Completely different design, too much work to integrate for no benefit.
|
|
|
|
Sir William
Member

Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 11
|
 |
February 26, 2018, 05:35:44 AM |
|
Fair enough. Thanks for the reply.
|
|
|
|
nizzuu
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
Cryptocurrency enthusiast
|
 |
February 26, 2018, 04:46:49 PM |
|
joblo, do you plan to add huge pages support in the nearest future?
|
|
|
|
EaglesGPC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2018, 06:11:58 PM |
|
What best instruction for i7 7700k?
ty
|
|
|
|
sparco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2018, 07:49:15 PM |
|
"2018-02-26 20:41:55] CPU #0: 584 H, 15.35 H/s [2018-02-26 20:42:50] stratum_recv_line failed [2018-02-26 20:42:50] CPU #0: 863 H, 15.68 H/s [2018-02-26 20:42:50] Stratum difficulty set to 0.001 [2018-02-26 20:43:20] lyra2z330 block 251834, network diff 0.390 [2018-02-26 20:43:20] CPU #0: 495 H, 16.62 H/s [2018-02-26 20:44:24] CPU #0: 998 H, 15.58 H/s [2018-02-26 20:44:32] lyra2z330 block 251835, network diff 0.414 [2018-02-26 20:44:32] CPU #0: 110 H, 14.89 H/s [2018-02-26 20:44:59] Share submitted. [2018-02-26 20:44:59] CPU #0: 424 H, 15.92 H/s [2018-02-26 20:44:59] Accepted 190/192 (99.0%), diff 1.58e-05, 15.92 H/s, 0C [2018-02-26 20:45:59] Share submitted. [2018-02-26 20:45:59] CPU #0: 948 H, 15.78 H/s [2018-02-26 20:45:59] Accepted 191/193 (99.0%), diff 6.69e-06, 15.78 H/s, 0C [2018-02-26 20:46:28] Stratum difficulty set to 0.00016667 [2018-02-26 20:46:29] lyra2z330 block 251836, network diff 0.414 [2018-02-26 20:46:29] CPU #0: 485 H, 16.16 H/s"
Im mining zoin using vps for tested
|
|
|
|
|
ttttt8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 27, 2018, 10:10:00 PM |
|
all flavors crash mining neoscrypt on windows 10 using intel avx2 capable cpu (i7 gen 8 ) : cpuminer-opt v3.8.3.3
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
February 27, 2018, 11:31:59 PM |
|
Errata:
Neoscrypt crashes on Windows, use legacy version.
|
|
|
|
4ward
Member

Offline
Activity: 473
Merit: 18
|
 |
February 28, 2018, 07:35:48 PM |
|
But the bottom line, hashrate is a function of how many hashes can a processor calculate
Agree with your comments about pool stats, that is what I am aiming to replicate because it represents actual earnings. But CPU performance is static, once it's benchmarked why would you need/want continuous monitoring? I'm using an automated script (personal fork of Megaminer) for all benchmarking and mining. For benchmarking, I prefer to mine to a real pool, while also earning a little, without having to use "--benchmark" For some algos, the time until initial share can be very high (as in minutes), which makes for unnecessary long benchmark Sometimes the first share is submitted very fast (often happens for me with Lyra2z), and the reported rate, until the next share is submitted, is of 1 or 2 threads, which is very low and thus skews the benchmark It is also used in a watchdog to see that the miner really works as it should I'll consider that after I come up with a better way to report earnings. I'll have to figure out how pools convert a share to a hashrate then do the same calculation locally if I have all the variables. That would be a new data term that would probably be measured in hash rate and would be normalized based on share submission rate and share difficulty. The existing HS or KHS could then be used as you request and represent CPU performance. That would be "effective hashrate", its highly luck based, and not suitable for benchmarking. Although it could be nice to have to see how is you luck 
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
February 28, 2018, 10:14:07 PM |
|
That would be "effective hashrate", its highly luck based, and not suitable for benchmarking. Although it could be nice to have to see how is you luck  Precisely why I want real data when mining. Benchmarking is done in a controlled environment free of extraneous variables like network latency, It's a theoretical value, essentialy a specification, like a car's fuel consumtion rating. I don't need the fuel consumtion rating displayed on my dashboard when I'm driving. I want real data, like fuel remaining and kms driven so I know how well it's performing vs the specification. I still have no idea why you would want theoretical data when real data is available.
|
|
|
|
4ward
Member

Offline
Activity: 473
Merit: 18
|
 |
February 28, 2018, 10:29:11 PM |
|
That would be "effective hashrate", its highly luck based, and not suitable for benchmarking. Although it could be nice to have to see how is you luck  Precisely why I want real data when mining. Benchmarking is done in a controlled environment free of extraneous variables like network latency, It's a theoretical value, essentialy a specification, like a car's fuel consumtion rating. I don't need the fuel consumtion rating displayed on my dashboard when I'm driving. I want real data, like fuel remaining and kms driven so I know how well it's performing vs the specification. I still have no idea why you would want theoretical data when real data is available. Theoretical data allows me to immediately detect if anything is affecting the hashrate while mining (by comparing to the benchmark) Be it overlocking, background process, other miner (GPU) or whatever and adjust accordingly
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
March 01, 2018, 12:07:48 AM |
|
That would be "effective hashrate", its highly luck based, and not suitable for benchmarking. Although it could be nice to have to see how is you luck  Precisely why I want real data when mining. Benchmarking is done in a controlled environment free of extraneous variables like network latency, It's a theoretical value, essentialy a specification, like a car's fuel consumtion rating. I don't need the fuel consumtion rating displayed on my dashboard when I'm driving. I want real data, like fuel remaining and kms driven so I know how well it's performing vs the specification. I still have no idea why you would want theoretical data when real data is available. Theoretical data allows me to immediately detect if anything is affecting the hashrate while mining (by comparing to the benchmark) Be it overlocking, background process, other miner (GPU) or whatever and adjust accordingly End to end monitoring will identify those issues as well as networking and pool issues. If you are concerned specifically about system performance, run a system monitor. Cpuminer is not a system monitor and should not be used as one.
|
|
|
|
sblack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 02, 2018, 07:10:09 AM |
|
Hi! Hope you help me. I have a 1PC for run cpuminer-opt without root access. But can compile it on my home PC. Is any way to compile cpuminer-opt with all dependencies? Otherwise I get errors "can not find *******.so" on 1PC. thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
March 02, 2018, 02:58:59 PM |
|
Hi! Hope you help me. I have a 1PC for run cpuminer-opt without root access. But can compile it on my home PC. Is any way to compile cpuminer-opt with all dependencies? Otherwise I get errors "can not find *******.so" on 1PC. thanks in advance
That is an issue between you and the owner of the PC. I won't help you.
|
|
|
|
sblack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 02, 2018, 04:32:24 PM |
|
No any criminal. This is prepaid deducted server in internet. Even with root access I can not compile due to old centos version
|
|
|
|
Dead Things
|
 |
March 02, 2018, 05:16:31 PM |
|
Any insights for how to resolve this compile error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreadGC2 This is a 4P Opteron 6278 box running Ubuntu 16.04. Did do: sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson-dev libgmp-dev automake sudo ./autogen.sh sudo CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS -std=gnu++11" ./configure --with-curl make Even tried: sudo apt-get install libevent-pthreads-2.0-5 sudo apt-get install libpthread-stubs0-dev ...to no avail. Any insight or assistance would be greatly appreciated! Cheers!
|
|
|
|
slimslots
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 02, 2018, 09:56:59 PM |
|
How to use CPU mining XMR in MiningPoolHub ?
First time of me T T
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
March 03, 2018, 06:11:36 AM |
|
Any insights for how to resolve this compile error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreadGC2 This is a 4P Opteron 6278 box running Ubuntu 16.04. Did do: sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson-dev libgmp-dev automake sudo ./autogen.sh sudo CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -Wall" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS -std=gnu++11" ./configure --with-curl make Even tried: sudo apt-get install libevent-pthreads-2.0-5 sudo apt-get install libpthread-stubs0-dev ...to no avail. Any insight or assistance would be greatly appreciated! Cheers! Have you tried using ./build.sh? It's always best to use the recommended procedure first, at least before reporting problems. Unless you're using the legacy version (and you shouldn't with that CPU) you don't need CXXFLAGS. As for the errors, pthreadGC2 is linked for Windows cross compile, I don't know why it's trying to link it here. No one else has reported that problem and a lot of people use Ubuntu 16.04. It should be just pthread. Edit: I should note I didn't have to install anything special on Mint 18 (Ubuntu 16.04) for pthread.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
March 03, 2018, 06:16:54 AM |
|
How to use CPU mining XMR in MiningPoolHub ?
First time of me T T
There should be instructions at the pool. Most versions of cpuminer use the same syntax, you can always try --help. You should also read README.txt to determine the best exe for your CPU.
|
|
|
|
|