Thank you for your answers and opinions, they help me to grasp some aspects of BTC. I'm the OP if you perhaps wondered where he is
And just to comment the possibility of forking over the supply limit:
I think that for instance in the future there will most likely be a split regarding increasing the supply of Bitcoin. Since there are many people that do not believe in the deflationary economic model of Bitcoin. I would side with keeping the supply limited, however I can see how in the future especially as a larger segment of the world becomes involved with Bitcoin that this could become an issue and might even lead to a split.
Something that could be a strong argument of not changning the currency supply limit are the competitive currency. Once BTC would become hard forked by Keynesians to achieve inflationary behavior, the biggest BTC holders could simply reach a consensus to put all their investments in a competitive currency, say Litecoin, Zerocash, etc. That could create a crash that would severely damage the bitcoin's reputation and its value. And at the same time massively lift power and worth of this competitive currency.
As long as economic majority (and these are no politicians and no standard bankers) in BTC is in approval of limited supply, there is no fear.
But campaigns to change this state of supply are expected. We have seen them on this forum too.