Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 07:44:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitfury chip integration  (Read 2330 times)
HyperMega
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2016, 10:41:03 AM
 #21

So 13 USD per chip for 50 GHs, way to expensive for production
For engineering it is OK

That's the price of the efficiency! The chip performance is low.

I guess they will sell the chip with respect to the nominal speed of 100 GH/s for $13. But at this operation point you will not have 0.06 J/GH.
According to their press release it should be approximately 0.12 J/GH instead.
Anyway, this would still be a good price.
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715413458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715413458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715413458
Reply with quote  #2

1715413458
Report to moderator
1715413458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715413458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715413458
Reply with quote  #2

1715413458
Report to moderator
1715413458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715413458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715413458
Reply with quote  #2

1715413458
Report to moderator
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2016, 12:07:44 PM
 #22

I guess they will sell the chip with respect to the nominal speed of 100 GH/s for $13. But at this operation point you will not have 0.06 J/GH.
Yeah my interpretation is its more of a headline efficiency which could be used in the second half of this gen (like S4/S4+).


Anyway, this would still be a good price.
$0.13/GH certainly isn't terrible when you consider how cheap their reference design is to make and should allow the OEMs to get by at least for now.

el_rlee (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014



View Profile
January 18, 2016, 01:11:40 PM
 #23

I guess they will sell the chip with respect to the nominal speed of 100 GH/s for $13. But at this operation point you will not have 0.06 J/GH.
Yeah my interpretation is its more of a headline efficiency which could be used in the second half of this gen (like S4/S4+).


Anyway, this would still be a good price.
$0.13/GH certainly isn't terrible when you consider how cheap their reference design is to make and should allow the OEMs to get by at least for now.

Have you got information regarding the reference design or are you just guessing?
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2016, 01:27:43 PM
 #24

I guess they will sell the chip with respect to the nominal speed of 100 GH/s for $13. But at this operation point you will not have 0.06 J/GH.
Yeah my interpretation is its more of a headline efficiency which could be used in the second half of this gen (like S4/S4+).


Anyway, this would still be a good price.
$0.13/GH certainly isn't terrible when you consider how cheap their reference design is to make and should allow the OEMs to get by at least for now.

Have you got information regarding the reference design or are you just guessing?

Look at previous boards and the board in the test - they're almost bare.

el_rlee (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014



View Profile
January 18, 2016, 04:19:41 PM
 #25

Look at previous boards and the board in the test - they're almost bare.

Are there reference designs or public information regarding any other than the 55nm bitfury generation?  It would be a waste not to put a heatsink on that chip - or immersion cool it, like they do themselfs.
Mitak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2016, 04:34:12 PM
 #26

For 100+ GHs per chip you'll need a heat sink
From the info already in the open air I'm planning to do string design , but kind of a hybrid with DC/DC group just to play with the Voltage
There is no chip specs yet .
A lot of open questions like  Chaining of SPC ...
el_rlee (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014



View Profile
January 18, 2016, 04:56:11 PM
Last edit: January 18, 2016, 05:08:43 PM by el_rlee
 #27

For 100+ GHs per chip you'll need a heat sink
From the info already in the open air I'm planning to do string design , but kind of a hybrid with DC/DC group just to play with the Voltage
There is no chip specs yet .
A lot of open questions like  Chaining of SPC ...
I think we can trust that the chip is tailored for a string design.

Are there no seperate VDDio and VSSio pins?
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2016, 05:23:48 PM
 #28

Look at previous boards and the board in the test - they're almost bare.

Are there reference designs or public information regarding any other than the 55nm bitfury generation?  It would be a waste not to put a heatsink on that chip - or immersion cool it, like they do themselfs.

AFAIK no ones even benchmarked a 28nm chip in the wild, every machine must have been sold under a solid NDA or mandatory purchase order. Its pretty crazy if you think about it, 1000s and 1000s of BF3500s and BF4500s and not one has ever been 'tested'.

QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
January 19, 2016, 05:30:14 AM
 #29

Weren't the BF3500 and BF4500 based on one of their 55nm designs?

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
el_rlee (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014



View Profile
January 20, 2016, 03:17:18 PM
 #30

Weren't the BF3500 and BF4500 based on one of their 55nm designs?


Yeah, I think so. And there have been some "out in the wild"
Mitak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 20, 2016, 03:53:23 PM
 #31

For 100+ GHs per chip you'll need a heat sink
From the info already in the open air I'm planning to do string design , but kind of a hybrid with DC/DC group just to play with the Voltage
There is no chip specs yet .
A lot of open questions like  Chaining of SPC ...
I think we can trust that the chip is tailored for a string design.

Are there no seperate VDDio and VSSio pins?
NDA
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3752
Merit: 3869



View Profile
January 20, 2016, 05:30:27 PM
 #32

So you have to lay down a $1M order on the chips sight-unseen in order to get information about the chips? Either that's not correct or that's powerfully stupid.

"punin"/bitfury is saying that he will have smaller batches on "my site" without mentioning what "my site" is.
probably just bitfury's main site.
He also says that they currently have 98 chips (had 100, burned two by going to 180 Gh/s in immersion!).
Mass production-most likely late March-April (without overpay for a "hot lot").
Engineering schemes delivery in late Feb to those who pay now.
el_rlee (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014



View Profile
January 20, 2016, 05:47:54 PM
 #33

Probably www.bitfurystrikesback.com/
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!