1. you will not have more bitcoins on the market, they're all assigned to the addresses where they are already.
2. it duplicates the data for a while, it's true, but the new chain will be lighter.
3. no, does the same, just adds the input at #2.
4. meaningless...
The rest, even more meaningless... I think you understood this second chain was meant to create more coins.
The idea is to pass the current chain to "dead archive" and set a fresh one. So you wouldn't need to download 500 Gb+ of data due to blockchain oversize.
oh i see.. or you can just go play with blockstreams "liquid" which is pegged at bitcoins price but doesnt have a chain at all.. (note of sarcasm)
i have years ago already thought about a bit of code that has
"Vout" : [{
"Bvalue" : 50.00000000,
"Zvalue" : 124.002, "addresses" : [ "1goddamlongaddresses" ]}]
simply creating the most leanest possible way of creating 2 coins on one chain..
but it still ruins things. and bitcoin will be around well after 2140.. and so introducing a second coin in 2021 will have 119 years of history, even if you prune off bitcoin only data..