Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2017, 09:08:22 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Abuse of Trust because I doxxed Paul Revere and suchmoon  (Read 2625 times)
ABitNut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763


I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:44:31 AM
 #21

2. Contact the person on Depth 1 who has trusted cryptodevil (thus putting him on Depth 2). That would be dooglus.
I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.

@OP - why exactly did you dox suchmoon and Paul Revere? I really have not interacted with Paul, or really see what he posts about, and although I do not agree with suchmoon's tactics, I would say that (s)he overall contributes positively to the forum.



No proof yet ready to slander. I second Coinonomous:

Oh, FFS, give it up butthurt-quickscammer, do you really think we are stupid as you are?   Tongue


              ▄
            ▄███▄
          ▄███████▄
   ▄▄▄    █
█████████
   ███
    ███████████▄
██    ████    ████████▄
      ████    ██████████
  ████    ████▀██████████
  ████    ██▀   ▀█████████▄
      █████       █████████▄
      ███▀         ▀████████
  ██████▀           ▀███████
  █████▀             ▀█████
   ████ █▄▄▄     ▄▄▄█ ████
    ███ ▀███████████▀ ███
     ▀▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀▀
        ▀▀▄▄ ▀▀▀ ▄▄▀▀
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
|●  facebook
●  reddit
●  ann thread
|
█ ██
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██

██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
██ █
1513112902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513112902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513112902
Reply with quote  #2

1513112902
Report to moderator
1513112902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513112902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513112902
Reply with quote  #2

1513112902
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
mexxer-2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


Kinda back


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 08:17:44 AM
 #22

I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.
Highly doubt it, that dooglus would spend much time fighting ponzis, collecting evidences against them etc. But well, who am I to say, seems there is still a lot to the "Elite group" that no one knows.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694


GUNBOT Licenses -20% with ref. code 'GrumpyKitty'


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 08:32:29 PM
 #23

2. Contact the person on Depth 1 who has trusted cryptodevil (thus putting him on Depth 2). That would be dooglus.
I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.
I wouldn't know this and have never assumed it either. However, I have at least on 1 occasion questioned who cryptodevil was and why he was on Depth 2.


          ▄▄█████▌▐█████▄▄
       ▄█████████▌    ▀▀▀███▄
     ▄███████████▌  ▄▄▄▄   ▀██▄
   ▄█████████████▌  ▀▄▄▀     ▀██▄
  ▐██████████████▌  ▄▄▄▄       ▀█▌
 ▐███████████████▌             ▀█▌
 ████████████████▌  ▀▀▀█         ██
▐████████████████▌  ▄▄▄▄         ██▌
▐████████████████▌  ▀  ▀         ██▌
 ████████████████▌  █▀▀█         ██
 ▐███████████████▌  ▀▀▀▀        ▄█▌
  ▐██████████████▌  ▀▀▀▀       ▄█▌
   ▀█████████████▌  ▀▀█▀     ▄██▀
     ▀███████████▌  ▀▀▀▀   ▄██▀
       ▀█████████▌    ▄▄▄███▀
          ▀▀█████▌▐█████▀▀
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
▬◉▬
      ▄▄▄
 ▄▄█████████▄▄
  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   █▌▐█ █▌▐█
   █▌▐█ █▌▐█
 ▄███████████▄
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄






▄█████████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████████
██▀▀█▀▀████████
▀█████████████▀
kingaltcoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


★Nitrogensports.eu★


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 09:17:12 PM
 #24

I do not think this is trust abuse at all. cryptodevil left you a negative trust because he felt you can dox anybody and also you were trying to humiliate those guys by starting a signature campaign. This is ridiculous! Why dont you solve the matter within yourselves?

cryptodevil has done a good job tagging you.


           █████████████████     ████████
          █████████████████     ████████
         █████████████████     ████████
        █████████████████     ████████
       ████████              ████████
      ████████              ████████
     ████████     ███████  ████████     ████████
    ████████     █████████████████     ████████
   ████████     █████████████████     ████████
  ████████     █████████████████     ████████
 ████████     █████████████████     ████████
████████     ████████  ███████     ████████
            ████████              ████████
           ████████              ████████
          ████████     █████████████████
         ████████     █████████████████
        ████████     █████████████████
       ████████     █████████████████
▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
▬▬ THE LARGEST & MOST TRUSTED ▬▬
      BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     
   ▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
             ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄
     ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀        ▀▄▄▄▄          
▄▀▀▀▀                 █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
█                    ▀▄          █
 █   ▀▌     ██▄        █          █              
 ▀▄        ▐████▄       █        █
  █        ███████▄     ▀▄       █
   █      ▐████▄█████████████████████▄
   ▀▄     ███████▀                  ▀██
    █      ▀█████    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
     █       ▀███   ████      ████   ██
     ▀▄        ██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
      █        ██        ▄██▄        ██
       █       ██        ▀██▀        ██
       ▀▄      ██    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
        █      ██   ████      ████   ██
         █▄▄▄▄▀██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
               ██▄                  ▄██
                ▀████████████████████▀




  CASINO  ●  DICE  ●  POKER  
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   24 hour Customer Support   

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Coinonomous
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 202



View Profile
January 22, 2016, 02:05:46 AM
 #25

2. Contact the person on Depth 1 who has trusted cryptodevil (thus putting him on Depth 2). That would be dooglus.
I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.
I wouldn't know this and have never assumed it either. However, I have at least on 1 occasion questioned who cryptodevil was and why he was on Depth 2.

Oh wow, seriously QS, give it up, you're just grasping at straws as usual to discredit dooglus... again.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1128611.msg11922688#msg11922688

 Roll Eyes

I do not think this is trust abuse at all. cryptodevil left you a negative trust because he felt you can dox anybody and also you were trying to humiliate those guys by starting a signature campaign. This is ridiculous! Why dont you solve the matter within yourselves?

cryptodevil has done a good job tagging you.

Pretty much this yes.  Tongue
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260

#PathOfTotality


View Profile WWW
January 22, 2016, 06:07:45 AM
 #26

I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.
Highly doubt it, that dooglus would spend much time fighting ponzis, collecting evidences against them etc. But well, who am I to say, seems there is still a lot to the "Elite group" that no one knows.
You need to remember that dooglus does not work (he stopped working sometime around the time he started JD) so he has a lot of time on his hands. I acknowledge that this is mostly speculation at this point

As I mentioned previously, cryptodevil and dooglus tend to leave negative trust for many of the same types of people, but their trust rarely overlaps eachother. In the threads that they both post in they often share the same point of view.

As mentioned by Lauda, there is little (I would say "no") reason why he is on DT, as he has pretty much zero trading history, has no history of being trusted with anything of value (money/btc or otherwise) that I am aware of, and is fairly clearly an account that is used more or less exclusively for the purpose of harassing companies that he thinks (and sometimes may be correct) is a scam. Although I have no way to pinpointi exactly when cryptodevil was added to DT, I would say that he had likely given out very few trust ratings prior to being added to dooglus's trust list (and onto DT), which makes him being on DT additionally strange.

ABitNut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763


I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


View Profile
January 22, 2016, 07:03:38 AM
 #27

I don't have proof ATM, however I would say there is a fairly decent chance that dooglus is cryptodevil. They tend to echo eachother in who they leave negative trust to, however they very rarely leave trust against the same person. They also tend to echo eachother in threads they both post in, however never directly respond to eachother.
Highly doubt it, that dooglus would spend much time fighting ponzis, collecting evidences against them etc. But well, who am I to say, seems there is still a lot to the "Elite group" that no one knows.
You need to remember that dooglus does not work (he stopped working sometime around the time he started JD) so he has a lot of time on his hands. I acknowledge that this is mostly speculation at this point

As I mentioned previously, cryptodevil and dooglus tend to leave negative trust for many of the same types of people, but their trust rarely overlaps eachother. In the threads that they both post in they often share the same point of view.

As mentioned by Lauda, there is little (I would say "no") reason why he is on DT, as he has pretty much zero trading history, has no history of being trusted with anything of value (money/btc or otherwise) that I am aware of, and is fairly clearly an account that is used more or less exclusively for the purpose of harassing companies that he thinks (and sometimes may be correct) is a scam. Although I have no way to pinpointi exactly when cryptodevil was added to DT, I would say that he had likely given out very few trust ratings prior to being added to dooglus's trust list (and onto DT), which makes him being on DT additionally strange.

Ok. Here we go. Probably futile since you seem to avoid addressing anything I bring up.

1) You claim that your statement is "mostly" speculation. Which part of it is fact, and where is the proof?
2) All that time dooglus spends fighting ponzis could be spend in other ways as well. Regardless of how much time he has on his hands.
3) My views (including those on trustworthiness) are similar to those of numerous others here. Does that make me the same person as them?
4) The only reason cryptodevil is on DT is because dooglus trusts their feedback. You'd have to ask dooglus why he trusts cryptodevils' feedback.
5) You say it's likely cryptodevil gave out very few trust ratings prior to being added to DT while admitting you can't pinpoint when they were added. What do you base this statement on?

TL;DR:
Stop spreading the FUD, QuickSeller.


              ▄
            ▄███▄
          ▄███████▄
   ▄▄▄    █
█████████
   ███
    ███████████▄
██    ████    ████████▄
      ████    ██████████
  ████    ████▀██████████
  ████    ██▀   ▀█████████▄
      █████       █████████▄
      ███▀         ▀████████
  ██████▀           ▀███████
  █████▀             ▀█████
   ████ █▄▄▄     ▄▄▄█ ████
    ███ ▀███████████▀ ███
     ▀▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀▀
        ▀▀▄▄ ▀▀▀ ▄▄▀▀
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
|●  facebook
●  reddit
●  ann thread
|
█ ██
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██

██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
█ ██ █
██ █
DarkClam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 12:02:42 AM
 #28

Dooglus isn't said person. I know "dooglus" dox
cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 08:41:57 AM
 #29

Oh, isn't this thread simply the funniest! Can't believe I missed it.

Hi Quickscammer!

About this cryptodooglus/doogdevil accusation:



Now, either we are some sort of autobot artificial intelligence requiring no sleep, or maybe, just maybe, we might actually be two different people on opposite sides of the world. Twat.


Warning! Multiple ICO scams being launched through bot-posting forum threads, bought/hacked accounts and fake team profiles
mexxer-2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


Kinda back


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 08:47:20 AM
 #30

Now, either we are some sort of autobot artificial intelligence requiring no sleep, or maybe, just maybe, we might actually be two different people on opposite sides of the world. Twat.
You might've given him an idea for an accusation /sarcasm
XinXan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672



View Profile
February 25, 2016, 04:11:37 PM
 #31

Oh, isn't this thread simply the funniest! Can't believe I missed it.

Hi Quickscammer!

About this cryptodooglus/doogdevil accusation:



Now, either we are some sort of autobot artificial intelligence requiring no sleep, or maybe, just maybe, we might actually be two different people on opposite sides of the world. Twat.



Well dooglus alone seems to be a bot because he only takes a break from 10 to 14 so your pictures proved nothing really.

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2016, 04:20:39 PM
 #32

Well dooglus alone seems to be a bot because he only takes a break from 10 to 14 so your pictures proved nothing really.

"Time of Day" shifts depending on who took the screenshot and what their forum time zone is set as. crypto devil's remains at the default GMT, so assuming Dooglus is US that 'night time' needs to shift back 5 to 8 hours.

That would put his downtime between 2-7am which is perfectly normal. If you look at nocturnal people like mine, there is far more 24 hour coverage.

cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 04:24:25 PM
 #33

You know you could check those numbers yourself, right?


Warning! Multiple ICO scams being launched through bot-posting forum threads, bought/hacked accounts and fake team profiles
Heutenamos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 05:21:00 PM
 #34

Dont you know who suchmoon is ?

yo
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
February 25, 2016, 05:38:32 PM
 #35

Dont you know who suchmoon is ?

No idea.

GAWSOME class action
(Homero Garza throws Stuart Fraser under the bus)
ION: XPY successor
                 Make sure to read

                 BitcoinTalk rules
          /s
Heutenamos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe


View Profile
February 25, 2016, 06:32:16 PM
 #36

Dont you know who suchmoon is ?

No idea.
Then get the idea and in the meantime i will PM you who he is.

yo
Decoded
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Crypto-News.net: News from Crypto World


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 01:19:23 AM
 #37

Doxxing scammers isn't against the rules, but doxxing non-scammers is. Maybe they take it that you are accusing them of being scammers? Anyway, one way or another, doxxing a DT is highly disrespectful if they havent done anything wrong.



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





BobLawblaw
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Gayest Black Cowboy on BitcoinTalk / Power-Top


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 01:45:30 AM
 #38

Doxxing scammers isn't against the rules, but doxxing non-scammers is.

Yeah... No. Doxxing of all kinds is allowed here, unless it's Theymos.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:41:59 AM
 #39

Doxxing scammers isn't against the rules, but doxxing non-scammers is. Maybe they take it that you are accusing them of being scammers? Anyway, one way or another, doxxing a DT is highly disrespectful if they havent done anything wrong.

If you're responding to the OP - Dr. Keith Harville abandoned that account about a month ago and also abandoned the shitcoin that started this whole mess.

GAWSOME class action
(Homero Garza throws Stuart Fraser under the bus)
ION: XPY successor
                 Make sure to read

                 BitcoinTalk rules
          /s
Decoded
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Crypto-News.net: News from Crypto World


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 06:17:46 AM
 #40

Doxxing scammers isn't against the rules, but doxxing non-scammers is. Maybe they take it that you are accusing them of being scammers? Anyway, one way or another, doxxing a DT is highly disrespectful if they havent done anything wrong.

If you're responding to the OP - Dr. Keith Harville abandoned that account about a month ago and also abandoned the shitcoin that started this whole mess.


I still don't understand the point of doxxing, besides for a malicious purpose. It's kind of rude, since this is mostly an anonymous forum.



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!