Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 11:31:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Apparently Chinese Mining Pools are sticking with Core! :)  (Read 3664 times)
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030


Twitter @realmicroguy


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 12:08:13 PM
Last edit: January 21, 2016, 01:45:05 PM by MicroGuy
 #1

Thank you China for sticking with Core! May the Chinese miners live long and much prosper! Smiley



~~

"Yesterday, Jeff(Garzik?), a developer of Bitcoin Classic, took a flight to Beijing from New York, to attend a meeting with the Chinese Bitcoin businesses, including Haobtc, OKCoin, Bitmain, Bither, LIGHTNINGASIC, with the aim of gaining further support for Bitcoin Classic. When talking about Bitcoin Classic's releases, Jeff stated that a hard fork is needed for the upgrading and improvement of the source code(the original Chinese are weasel words and possibly syntactically incorrect), yet(and) without providing a clear long-term roadmap(about what lies ahead of the 2MB increase?), which led to almost universal dissatisfaction(correction: the author later edited his article to change the "almost universal" to "some" , apparently due to protest from one attendant who did not disapprove) among those present, whom further expressed their withdrawal of support for Bitcoin Classic, and the need to reach a wider consensus within the community before a decision can be made."

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/41zgn6/translation_of_an_excerpt_from_an_article/

~~
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713569469
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713569469

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713569469
Reply with quote  #2

1713569469
Report to moderator
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030


Twitter @realmicroguy


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 12:09:29 PM
 #2

Bitcoin Magazine journalist and Coin Desk contributor Aaron van Wirdum



https://twitter.com/AaronvanW/status/690120783281156097
RocketSingh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:10:45 PM
 #3

Related: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1335742.0

watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:14:36 PM
 #4

ToomimCoin REKT
DimensionZ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Shit, did I leave the stove on?


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:34:12 PM
 #5

What long-term consequences could this decision have for the speed of transactions when the time comes and it's nearing or surpassing the current cap?

watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:47:55 PM
 #6

What long-term consequences could this decision have for the speed of transactions when the time comes and it's nearing or surpassing the current cap?

Two words: Fee Market
pooya87
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 10492



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 12:55:20 PM
 #7

as long as i remember they were not so happy about the changes and the bigger block sizes (something to do with their bandwidth) and now i think because the fact that they control more than half of the hashrate (more than 70% combined) they are going to be an strong opposing force.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
lottery248
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1005


beware of your keys.


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 01:36:00 PM
 #8

What long-term consequences could this decision have for the speed of transactions when the time comes and it's nearing or surpassing the current cap?

Two words: Fee Market

fee market? either make more paper wallet to evade the transaction fees, or start to accept altcoins to support the demand. lmao.
we don't just stick with bitcoin, that's why altcoin is here to be useful. Smiley

out of ability to use the signature, i want a new ban strike policy that will fade the strike after 90~120 days of the ban and not to be traced back, like google | email me for anything urgent, message will possibly not be instantly responded
i am not really active for some reason
defaultking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 01:57:59 PM
 #9

So as a newbie that's still learning about bitcoin. Is this a good or bad thing?
xdrpx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 603


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 02:00:00 PM
 #10

I was expecting this news to show up. With china leading in the mining space for Bitcoins and most of them supporting to stick to Bitcoin core, there isn't much hope for Bitcoin Classic and XT.
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 02:01:13 PM
 #11

China's inertia is always their undoing.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030


Twitter @realmicroguy


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 02:15:17 PM
 #12

I was expecting this news to show up. With china leading in the mining space for Bitcoins and most of them supporting to stick to Bitcoin core, there isn't much hope for Bitcoin Classic and XT.

The Chinese people are intelligent, kind, united, and freedom loving.

What many here obviously don't understand is how a people that has been repressed for centuries yearns for liberation like a drowning man seeks shore. And they aren't going to be fooled quite as easily by the "Classic" tricks of establishment rule.

Bitcoin can only survive, united at its "Core". The Chinese miners have wisely made the correct decision once again.

watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 02:24:17 PM
 #13

I am standing strong behind the consensus as defined by Satoshi Nakamoto.

Long live Bitcoin!
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 02:35:59 PM
 #14

It's so fascinating to me that there is a small collection of leaders for a supposedly free decentralized currency flying around the world to discuss the future direction of that currency with a small concentrated group of power brokers. Hurray for decentralization!

Expenses for a trip like that would cost at least a couple thousand dollars (last time I went to Shanghai airfare alone was just over a grand).  I wonder what "decentralized" consortium paid the expenses?

Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 03:04:32 PM
 #15

The Chinese obviously see the benefits of soft forks and also what things like SegWit can do for this technology. They have been supporters of Bitcoin Core long before this

visit any way, but Jeff just made sure the people with the most say {biggest hash rate} gets what they want. Any country in the world, can do what they did. If the USA or

any other nation for that matter, stopped buying Billions of dollars worth of weapons and used that to establish Bitcoin farms, they could have easily be in that position and they

would have been calling the shots.  Grin

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 03:19:18 PM
 #16

I think this is a victory for common sense and for progressing Bitcoin sensibly forward.

长命富贵


Cheesy
(a Chinese blessing for our Bitcoin baby)

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
mercistheman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 21, 2016, 03:29:48 PM
 #17

Anyone else concerned about the potential for collusion here?
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 03:30:49 PM
 #18

Anyone else concerned about the potential for collusion here?

well it's all about consensus after all, if the consensus is in the majority chinese from germany, usa or any other country is not important

miners are still not the only important part of bitcoin hopefully, merchants have their importance too and they are not 60%+ chinese...
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
January 21, 2016, 03:45:38 PM
 #19

It was well pointed out by BitFury's CEO Bitcoin was never designed to be a PayPal (wherever that idea came from I don't know as it isn't actually what Satoshi had written in his white paper).

Bitcoin requires "confirmations" by design (which is why Satoshi never advocated using zero confirmations) and these confirmations take time.

So Bitcoin *is* a settlement network - but it is one unlike any other before (you don't need a license to use it nor expensive hardware). Let's appreciate what Bitcoin is rather than support people trying to change it into something that it isn't.

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
Snorek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 21, 2016, 03:51:03 PM
 #20

It is not surprising at all that Chinese miners would opt to go with Core. They all have 'here and now' mentality, they don't care much about bitcoin future, or growing the network adoption or consumer base.
Every solution increasing blocksize is not good for them because it will diminish theirs earnings.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!