|
ol92
|
 |
February 18, 2016, 09:45:49 AM |
|
Great comparison : thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
February 19, 2016, 11:09:53 AM |
|
Great comparison : thanks!
You're welcome. Still have a lot on my "Todo list". But have been having it very busy lately so i pushed that little project a little to the side. Will definitely work on it as soon as i've got some spare time. Thx for liking it  |
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 05, 2016, 01:05:23 PM |
|
Thx for everyone that has been submitting configs/cards.
We now have 170 active configs/cards.
Please keep them coming!
I will clean up as soon as i find some time to do this.
My apologies for that.
Again, keep it as honest as you can please.
It has no point of submitting configs that aren't realistic.
That doesn't help anyone.
I will do some extra modifications on the commenting system as this isn't optimal at this point.
Thx again!
Greetings!
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 14, 2016, 06:19:21 PM |
|
I've been seeing some unrealistic entries lately.
Please keep it honest guys.
An R9 380 just cannot do 41Mh/s @ Ethereum on stock clocks. I doubt that even if it would be heavily OC'ed it wouldn't even get that high.
Same for a 390 (non x). That card just does not do 40Mh on Ethereum. I own that card myself and at those clocks i barely hit 30Mh.
So please keep it as honest as possible.
Thx
|
|
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
March 15, 2016, 04:28:46 PM |
|
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
|
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 15, 2016, 05:26:02 PM |
|
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I have yes. Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds But if it was true. They should mention it. Greetings |
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
March 15, 2016, 05:57:56 PM |
|
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I have yes. Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds But if it was true. They should mention it. Greetings Benchmarking eth mining is tricky : if you use the built in benchmark, it will use the initial dag which will leads to higher scores for most cards. Moreover, you will have some significant variances between the differents runs: the builtin bench will give the max/mean/min, but I suppose some people have given the max instead of the mean. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
Tmdz
|
|
March 18, 2016, 06:42:26 AM |
|
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me. You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.
|
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 18, 2016, 08:22:07 AM |
|
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me. You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.
Thank you very much for your kind words. This is more valuable to me then money! Really appreciate it! :-) |
|
|
|
|
ashkanb
|
|
March 20, 2016, 05:07:23 PM |
|
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks. keep up the good work. |
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 20, 2016, 07:29:51 PM |
|
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks. keep up the good work. Will do! Thank you! Definitely need some spare time to do some upgrades/clean up. Future plans :p |
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:02:49 PM |
|
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
March 21, 2016, 08:20:49 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2016, 09:46:47 PM by ol92 |
|
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
From the results, non oc fury beats non oc hawaï and oc fury is just a little bit better than oc hawaï but at a lower power. Beside pure compute performance, one key point is memory latency access in eth mining + some memory cache: hbm is very good for bandwith but not so much for latency. On nvidia side, a GTX 970 is almost as good as a GTX 980 Ti probably due to issue with memory cache or latency... |
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 21, 2016, 09:11:34 PM |
|
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
I could do that from one of my nano's yes. Fury not anymore, i sold those. I'm sure a Fury can beat any hawaii card. If you OC it high enough that is Same for Hawaii, if you run a high end hawaii card at stock clocks, and you run a fury x at stock clocks it'll go faster. If you oc that hawaii card, it'll beat that fury. Obviously.... |
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 22, 2016, 06:39:52 AM
Last edit: March 22, 2016, 07:19:47 AM by rednoW |
|
Thanx, I already got it  Definetly memory latency issue ... or not optimal opencl code for ethhash to use all the 4k CU's Here is 290x doing 32-33mh for comparison  |
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1023
Seabet.io | Crypto-Casino
|
|
March 22, 2016, 07:14:35 AM |
|
i hope they will fix that issue with the new generation of gpu for nvidia, or ethereum will remain preferabely with amd gpu, and no competition is bad, it make gpu more expensive
|
|
|
|
Yutard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2016, 06:58:15 AM |
|
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?
|
|
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 31, 2016, 06:56:51 PM |
|
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?
I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's. Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it.. |
|
|
|
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
March 31, 2016, 07:01:50 PM |
|
Btw. Over 300 Cards/configs already! Keep em coming guys! Yeah i know, i seriously need to do an upgrade....  Those 14 Inactive cards are either Unrealistic or incomplete submissions... |
|
|
|
Lucentar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2016, 08:18:37 PM |
|
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?
I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's. Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it.. The DAG file size is only 1.3GB at the moment, why the 280x hash rate dropped from 28 to 22 MH/s, while it has 3GB memory? |
|
|
|
|
|
