List of all cryptocoins

[ripper234]

Thanks.

How about you guys put some of these in the wiki?

good idea, but first let us tweak and tune this information here, before making it "official"

A publicly editable wiki is never official.
My approach is to just go ahead and edit the wiki ... you can always edit later & improve.

[1713493883]

1713493883

[1713493883]

1713493883

[1713493883]

1713493883

[1713493883]

1713493883

[1713493883]

1713493883

[jtimon]

I've changed the wiki so that it links to the main page (http://freico.in/) instead of the forum (http://www.freicoin.org/).

[ripper234]

I've changed the wiki so that it links to the main page (http://freico.in/) instead of the forum (http://www.freicoin.org/).

Cool. How come freicoin.org is the forum and not the main page?

[jtimon]

I've changed the wiki so that it links to the main page (http://freico.in/) instead of the forum (http://www.freicoin.org/).

Cool. How come freicoin.org is the forum and not the main page?

Well...first there was only the forum and I bought that domain. Mark (maaku) bought freico.in. We could have changed the domains later, but I think we're going to reserve freicoin.org to the foundation and put the forum on freico.in/forum or something like that.

[xorxor]

All day without protest to my descriptions, so I put them in first post with little upgrade and reorganization.

lets give it another day for people to check for errors, and it can go to wiki.

[ripper234]

All day without protest to my descriptions, so I put them in first post with little upgrade and reorganization.

lets give it another day for people to check for errors, and it can go to wiki.

Cool.

When it goes to wiki, you might want to consider splitting some of the information to the existing articles about some of the alts.

[tiker]

I didn't see bitchips on the list...  http://bitchip.org/

[xorxor]

I didn't see bitchips on the list...  http://bitchip.org/

cant find a single mention of it anywhere,and the page is in latin or smth that google translator cant handle.
would love to add it, but add what? just name?

/edit

ok, after more  research found some documentation, but it was a straight copy from bitcoin, not even bicoin name replaced with bitchip. I will ignore this one.

if You realy want it in the list, please provide any evidence that it actualy existed.

[dust]

-LTC Litecoin -  second only to BTC in numbers of places accepted and market volume, faster than BTC, CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly , ASIC - proof

I wouldn't call a coin that is unprofitable to CPU mine at most electricity rates "CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly".  The CPU friendliness was certainly important historically, but is no longer relevant today.

"Smaller efficiency gap between GPUs and CPUs" would be more accurate.  If anything, LTC is "botnet friendly".

LTC is not ASIC proof.  Any task computed with general purpose hardware could be done more efficiently with special purpose hardware.  If LTC mining was big enough, there would be ASICs in development.

[smoothie]

-LTC Litecoin -  second only to BTC in numbers of places accepted and market volume, faster than BTC, CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly , ASIC - proof

I wouldn't call a coin that is unprofitable to CPU mine at most electricity rates "CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly".  The CPU friendliness was certainly important historically, but is no longer relevant today.

"Smaller efficiency gap between GPUs and CPUs" would be more accurate.  If anything, LTC is "botnet friendly".

LTC is not ASIC proof.  Any task computed with general purpose hardware could be done more efficiently with special purpose hardware.  If LTC mining was big enough, there would be ASICs in development.

Yes likely when litecoin market cap is about $100million AT LEAST.

[xorxor]

-LTC Litecoin -  second only to BTC in numbers of places accepted and market volume, faster than BTC, CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly , ASIC - proof

I wouldn't call a coin that is unprofitable to CPU mine at most electricity rates "CPU friendly, GPU - unfriendly".  The CPU friendliness was certainly important historically, but is no longer relevant today.

"Smaller efficiency gap between GPUs and CPUs" would be more accurate.  If anything, LTC is "botnet friendly".

LTC is not ASIC proof.  Any task computed with general purpose hardware could be done more efficiently with special purpose hardware.  If LTC mining was big enough, there would be ASICs in development.

you are 100% right.

but understand me, I'm trying to make a one line description, not something like that:
second only to BTC in numbers of places accepted and market volume, faster than BTC, CPU friendly by design but not anymore due to GPU mining arrived more electicity efficient , GPU - unfriendly at the begining but now gpu mined , ASIC - proof right now , but maybe in the future become so big in market volume that asics development will be possible.

"Smaller efficiency gap between GPUs and CPUs"  - i like that, editing the list. sadly had to shorten other parts to keep it one-liner but I realy want description to be satifying for most, not to reflect only my point of view.

[jtimon]

I didn't see bitchips on the list...  http://bitchip.org/

cant find a single mention of it anywhere,and the page is in latin or smth that google translator cant handle.
would love to add it, but add what? just name?

The latin doesn't talk about the project, that's just dummy text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum

[xorxor]

I didn't see bitchips on the list...  http://bitchip.org/

cant find a single mention of it anywhere,and the page is in latin or smth that google translator cant handle.
would love to add it, but add what? just name?

The latin doesn't talk about the project, that's just dummy text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum

That's just another evidence that it never even started.

[bushstar]

How about...

ecash - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecash

[FuzzyBear]

re E-cash.... sigh we may well start something that cannot be complete as what about swagbucks too.... i think the idea would be to list all btc forks or blockchain related currencies right ?

[ripper234]

re E-cash.... sigh we may well start something that cannot be complete as what about swagbucks too.... i think the idea would be to list all btc forks or blockchain related currencies right ?

Yeah, that's more on topic.

[bushstar]

re E-cash.... sigh we may well start something that cannot be complete as what about swagbucks too.... i think the idea would be to list all btc forks or blockchain related currencies right ?

Perhaps if we could look at ecash we'd realise that Bitcoin is an ecash fork

[FuzzyBear]

re E-cash.... sigh we may well start something that cannot be complete as what about swagbucks too.... i think the idea would be to list all btc forks or blockchain related currencies right ?

Perhaps if we could look at ecash we'd realise that Bitcoin is an ecash fork

meh more of a spork i would say rather than a fork... think BTC took things a bit further... but that just my initial reading and understanding of Ecash

[xorxor]

e-cash and e-money are part of / continuation of    digicash, so it's allready on the list. still bankrupted.

[DannyM]

Beertokens - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9493.0

WEEDS - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24209.msg300830#msg300830

Groupcoin - (still active) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24813.0

Ripples (XRP) - ripple.com

Also ask markm which of his OT galactic mileiu currencies started out as actual blockchains, several did, but he stopped thenm due to low hash power.