tuvok007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 31, 2017, 07:52:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
sharepool100
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2017, 09:52:49 PM |
|
VOTE FOR SHAREPOOL100A great new pool is in town! Pull your colts and vote for sharepool100. sharepool100 will share 100% of all forged LSK + a bonus!
Every voter who votes sharepool100 with more than... ...100,000 LSK will get 100 LSK... ...200,000 LSK will get 230 LSK... ...300,000 LSK will get 380 LSK... ...on top of every payout!
Requirements * You must vote sharepool100 with 30,000 LSK or more! * You don't have 30,000 LSK? You can buy it here.
Why vote for this pool? * It's open source * Guaranteed delegate uptime of 99,9% = more LSK for you! * Payouts: If voters account reached 200 LSK to save transaction fees = more LSK for you!
WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? VOTE FOR SHAREPOOL100! Lisk Forum: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1440
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 01:10:34 AM |
|
Delegate monitor shows lots of missed blocks and non forging delegates. any insights?
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 01:23:22 AM |
|
Yeah, I figured. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Cash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
April 01, 2017, 07:01:26 AM |
|
Sounds great, looks like decent odds.
|
|
|
|
Poly#Crypto
|
|
April 01, 2017, 07:02:59 AM |
|
Haha - great. I'm the CEO of Ripple.
April 1 today?
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 07:18:36 AM |
|
Haha - great. I'm the CEO of Ripple.
April 1 today?
Much Dogecoin Very wow Here's a serious question, though: during the live meeting, someone stated(not one from the team, but someone asking a question), that sidechains probably won't work.The question sounded like it was part of a longer discussion. Can anyone fill me in on why people think sidechains won't work? To me, this sounds rather trivial…?
|
|
|
|
Chris Cash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
April 01, 2017, 07:59:44 AM |
|
Haha - great. I'm the CEO of Ripple.
April 1 today?
Much Dogecoin Very wow Here's a serious question, though: during the live meeting, someone stated(not one from the team, but someone asking a question), that sidechains probably won't work.The question sounded like it was part of a longer discussion. Can anyone fill me in on why people think sidechains won't work? To me, this sounds rather trivial…? Googling for sidechains brings up a lot of information, do you know of a quality article that is up to date and relevent?
|
|
|
|
MoveCrypto
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
|
|
April 01, 2017, 05:45:28 PM |
|
What's going on here? Almost 2000 pages.
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
April 01, 2017, 05:46:01 PM Last edit: April 01, 2017, 06:55:11 PM by MrPresident |
|
Announcement:Through many months of collaboration between the devteams at both Ethereum and Lisk, The Ethereum network core devteam has finally decided that the upcoming Casper release will be a slightly modified Lisk core powering the Main Ethereum chain algorithm. Furthermore, the Lisk team wishes to extend a huge welcome to Vitalik and several key members of the Devteam as they will work together to not only strengthen both core chains, but will also implementing x-11 privacy algorithms upon the Lisk core network, and have a Lisk sidechain that hosts all Ethereum erc-20 tokens on a single Lisk sidechain with total backward compatibility with the current Ethereum core. This will allow Ethereum to drop the problematic issues involved with the mainchain load of sidechains stacked upon it. ... april fools! Eth will continue confuse devs and dazzle investors for years to come by continuing making great PR and bad coding decisions with gobs of money.
|
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK! Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 07:34:08 PM |
|
Haha - great. I'm the CEO of Ripple.
April 1 today?
Much Dogecoin Very wow Here's a serious question, though: during the live meeting, someone stated(not one from the team, but someone asking a question), that sidechains probably won't work.The question sounded like it was part of a longer discussion. Can anyone fill me in on why people think sidechains won't work? To me, this sounds rather trivial…? Googling for sidechains brings up a lot of information, do you know of a quality article that is up to date and relevent? Rambling mode on. I'm fucking tired, so what I write shouldn't be taken too seriously atm. Disclaimer: I am a fan and holder and I expect that the questions raised below are not new to the Lisk devs. Still, with my limited time, I can't follow lisk chat too closely, so I am sorry if these questions have already been answered. At the same time, they seem a little too technical for the community meetings, but maybe I am wrong. Anyway, here it goes: Thinking about it a little more, the problem doesn't sound so trivial anymore. The main problem seems to me, to have a good system in place to manage how a token leaves one chain and enters another one, as well as the other way around. In other blockchains, tokens don't "vanish". If you want to destroy them, you send them to an address which has no known private key. Setting up a system in which tokens are bound on the mainchain, because they technically are on another chain aren't really feasible. Another problem seems to be to keep addresses separated. If we assume, that the way an address is generated doesn't change between chains, every address generated can be used on all chains simultaneously. Without a central instance(i.e. Mainchain), which totally defeats the idea of sidechains, a scenario is possible, in which a token leaves the mainchain and is sent to an address, which exists on other sidechains, effectively multiplying the token. Since the sidechains can't crosscheck, whether a token exists on other chains as well, the check has to be made at the very point, where the token leaves the mainchain. If you would have a unique identifier per sidechain in place, which is added at the point of generating an address. thus, without using this identifier, you can't access your address, limiting you to using your tokens on the chain it is intended to be used on. The problem of this approach is, that all other chains will read the transactions as well, but have them on unusable addresses… Anither way would be to send tokens to two addresses: a chain address and a wallet address, pretty much like the city is different, but the street name is the same. Tagging a token somehow would be possible, too… Ok, too much bullshit thinking, sorry. Shouldn't hit send, but I'm gonna do it anyway
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
April 01, 2017, 08:04:42 PM |
|
ttookk; Lisk Sidechain tokens are not interactive with the lisk mainchain tokens on the lisk-main chain. With that said; Lisk tokens could be used on any sidechain as its base token or exchange token if a dev wished to do so, but any Lisk tx would ofc need recorded on the Lisk mainchain, or it never happened.
|
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK! Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 08:41:41 PM |
|
ttookk; Lisk Sidechain tokens are not interactive with the lisk mainchain tokens on the lisk-main chain. With that said; Lisk tokens could be used on any sidechain as its base token or exchange token if a dev wished to do so, but any Lisk tx would ofc need recorded on the Lisk mainchain, or it never happened.
I was focussing on Lisk, not on coloured tokens, because that is the most interesting and complicated part. As I tried to point out, recording Lisk leaving the mainchain is not enough, because there is the danger of it being claimed by multiple chains as being "sent to them". Even if you have a safeguard on the mainchain, prohibiting the token to reenter from other chains than the ones it was sent to, it looks like you might still pull off some nasty tricks.
|
|
|
|
BitBanksy
|
|
April 01, 2017, 09:11:32 PM |
|
Announcement:Through many months of collaboration between the devteams at both Ethereum and Lisk, The Ethereum network core devteam has finally decided that the upcoming Casper release will be a slightly modified Lisk core powering the Main Ethereum chain algorithm. Furthermore, the Lisk team wishes to extend a huge welcome to Vitalik and several key members of the Devteam as they will work together to not only strengthen both core chains, but will also implementing x-11 privacy algorithms upon the Lisk core network, and have a Lisk sidechain that hosts all Ethereum erc-20 tokens on a single Lisk sidechain with total backward compatibility with the current Ethereum core. This will allow Ethereum to drop the problematic issues involved with the mainchain load of sidechains stacked upon it. ... april fools! Eth will continue confuse devs and dazzle investors for years to come by continuing making great PR and bad coding decisions with gobs of money. 😂😂😂😂😂 well done!
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
April 01, 2017, 09:49:19 PM |
|
ttookk; Lisk Sidechain tokens are not interactive with the lisk mainchain tokens on the lisk-main chain. With that said; Lisk tokens could be used on any sidechain as its base token or exchange token if a dev wished to do so, but any Lisk tx would ofc need recorded on the Lisk mainchain, or it never happened.
I was focussing on Lisk, not on coloured tokens, because that is the most interesting and complicated part. As I tried to point out, recording Lisk leaving the mainchain is not enough, because there is the danger of it being claimed by multiple chains as being "sent to them". Even if you have a safeguard on the mainchain, prohibiting the token to reenter from other chains than the ones it was sent to, it looks like you might still pull off some nasty tricks. okay, the thing I think you're not understanding is that the Lisk never leave the main chain, ever. Even as "burnt" they are recorded as deposited to a lisk mainchain account. Any Lisk tx and token will be visible on the blockchain explorer, and cannot be transferred outside the lisk network. If sidechains are dealing with lisk tokens, every lisk tx they conduct will be recorded on the lisk main chain. 😂😂😂😂😂 well done!
|
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK! Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
April 01, 2017, 10:10:40 PM |
|
(…)
okay, the thing I think you're not understanding is that the Lisk never leave the main chain, ever. Even as "burnt" they are recorded as deposited to a lisk mainchain account. Any Lisk tx and token will be visible on the blockchain explorer, and cannot be transferred outside the lisk network. If sidechains are dealing with lisk tokens, every lisk tx they conduct will be recorded on the lisk main chain.
Ok, I wasn't aware of that. I expected the sidechains to be basically independent. Having every tx recorded on the mainchain does seem like a bloating issue in the long run, no?
|
|
|
|
Chevas Regal
|
|
April 02, 2017, 04:18:18 AM |
|
Today is final day for Newsletter Lotto, @Phoenix1969 please update here when it is done. Stats like Total number of participants.. What's going on here? Almost 2000 pages.
Yeah..seems some mature talks are going on..just wait for a year and then come back with the largest number of pages and most competing coin.
|
|
|
|
|