SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL

[Grgechkapitalac]

So, what are you going to do?

Ignore you , because I really don't care what you think.  

Later Gator,


 

I don't care what you care, ignorance will surely help.

@Griffith and @Barry
I hope you will be communicative enough about basic technical questions if needed.

Biggest problem is solved - I will not talk about anything else than told in sentence above.

Good luck.

[1713938445]

1713938445

[kiklo]

Why should anyone here even talk to you about supercoin , you claim has been dead for over a year.

Your Grasp of Reality seems confused at best,
the fact you can't tell the difference between a dead or live coin network , is kind of showcasing your personal issues. 


 

[Grgechkapitalac]

Why should anyone here even talk to you about supercoin , you claim has been dead for over a year.

Your Grasp of Reality seems confused at best,
the fact you can't tell the difference between a dead or live coin network , is kind of showcasing your personal issues. 


 

Said the man who has decided to ignore me... He however tried to mock me... funny.

Nobody was talking about coin network, but coin distribution and usability...and about personal issues, I won't talk about yours with anybody who is not going smoothly with your point of view. You sure have them.

Whatever I think or say, Griffith is respectable dev. And it looks Barry is trying to be fair. Why wouldn't they? To me, to anybody...
And also, you are not the only one here.

Good luck to you too. (No irony in this)

[kiklo]

I ignore your falsehoods, but will make fun of you for making them non-stop.

(Everyone needs a hobby, and I can't Dance.)  


 

[Grgechkapitalac]

To make fun of somebody, you should have sense of humour.
Do whatever is pleasing you. 
You can even dance. 

[kiklo]

To make fun of somebody, you should have sense of humour.
Do whatever is pleasing you. 
You can even dance. 

LOL,
Sense of Humor √   
it is just not always shared.   

 

[barrysty1e]

Why should anyone here even talk to you about supercoin , you claim has been dead for over a year.

Your Grasp of Reality seems confused at best,
the fact you can't tell the difference between a dead or live coin network , is kind of showcasing your personal issues.  


 

Said the man who has decided to ignore me... He however tried to mock me... funny.

Nobody was talking about coin network, but coin distribution and usability...and about personal issues, I won't talk about yours with anybody who is not going smoothly with your point of view. You sure have them.

Whatever I think or say, Griffith is respectable dev. And it looks Barry is trying to be fair. Why wouldn't they? To me, to anybody...
And also, you are not the only one here.

Good luck to you too. (No irony in this)

I'm not sure why everyone seems to be unsure or abandoning ship in terms of SuperCoin (either current or future).
No exchanges/listing on Coinmarketcap is no reason to worry (literally.. at all, unless you want to cash out).
I've both a permanent Supercoin node at my place, as well as an external one that I intend to use for the chainswap; I may keep it running for as long as I can.

I'm currently investigating a very awesome possibility in terms of upgrading the codebase.

If you didn't know (or not a programmer type); there was a large rewrite of both the Bitcoin/RPC engine between versions 0.8 and 0.9 of the Bitcoin codebase (which naturally most altcoins are derived from; most of them being pre-0.8.6). The earlier codebase started to strain when supporting large wallets or large blockchains, and performance from both UI and RPC suffered as a result. This prompted a rewrite, allowing post 0.9 clones to operate very efficiently regardless of the constraints (wallet/blockchain size) they were placed under.

Someone earlier mentioned that all these changes (including the chainswap) will mean that this isn't really Supercoin anymore.
It will be like Supercoin's older brother has stepped into place; the brother who taught Supercoin how to swagger.

To those who feel it necessary to leave, it is up to you; no harm done.
To those who want to hang around but are a bit nervous, just remember.. as long as there are nodes around and you've got your wallet safe and sound; your investment has not gone anywhere.
To those who have been patiently waiting, cheers guys; grab a beer, this is a learning experience as well as a good ride.

james

[SuperBen]

Why should anyone here even talk to you about supercoin , you claim has been dead for over a year.

Your Grasp of Reality seems confused at best,
the fact you can't tell the difference between a dead or live coin network , is kind of showcasing your personal issues.  


 

Said the man who has decided to ignore me... He however tried to mock me... funny.

Nobody was talking about coin network, but coin distribution and usability...and about personal issues, I won't talk about yours with anybody who is not going smoothly with your point of view. You sure have them.

Whatever I think or say, Griffith is respectable dev. And it looks Barry is trying to be fair. Why wouldn't they? To me, to anybody...
And also, you are not the only one here.

Good luck to you too. (No irony in this)

I'm not sure why everyone seems to be unsure or abandoning ship in terms of SuperCoin (either current or future).
No exchanges/listing on Coinmarketcap is no reason to worry (literally.. at all, unless you want to cash out).
I've both a permanent Supercoin node at my place, as well as an external one that I intend to use for the chainswap; I may keep it running for as long as I can.

I'm currently investigating a very awesome possibility in terms of upgrading the codebase.

If you didn't know (or not a programmer type); there was a large rewrite of both the Bitcoin/RPC engine between versions 0.8 and 0.9 of the Bitcoin codebase (which naturally most altcoins are derived from; most of them being pre-0.8.6). The earlier codebase started to strain when supporting large wallets or large blockchains, and performance from both UI and RPC suffered as a result. This prompted a rewrite, allowing post 0.9 clones to operate very efficiently regardless of the constraints (wallet/blockchain size) they were placed under.

Someone earlier mentioned that all these changes (including the chainswap) will mean that this isn't really Supercoin anymore.
It will be like Supercoin's older brother has stepped into place; the brother who taught Supercoin how to swagger.

To those who feel it necessary to leave, it is up to you; no harm done.
To those who want to hang around but are a bit nervous, just remember.. as long as there are nodes around and you've got your wallet safe and sound; your investment has not gone anywhere.
To those who have been patiently waiting, cheers guys; grab a beer, this is a learning experience as well as a good ride.

james

I fall under #2.   Holding 300k+ supes right now.  If it crashes I will burn with it.  If it moons, I will probably still burn cause I suck with money.  Either way, I am in for the long haul.

[GrinZ]

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

[TvZ]

Several people are running their Supercoin wallet 24/7.
Most of them didn't open port 19390 on their firewall/router.
Please open port 19390 for more and faster connections!
You will also help the network!

Thanks.

[mdtspain]

Lets start staking some Super

✩✩ Just an alert for the Yobit Exchange. It's not possible to withdraw your Super from that Exchange so don't buy or trade there ✩✩

[barrysty1e]

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

in walletdb.cpp; put // in front of the copy_file line, its only to do with backing up wallet - then compile again.

[barrysty1e]

Hi all,

While i love shilling accounts/trolls hanging shit on supercoin (actin' like they know), it does make me think that a little progress board isnt such a bad idea. Part of the reason that this is taking a while to do, is that there are quite a few separate/large tasks to be achieved before we can even think about launching SuperCoinPlus.

I'm still working on the blockexplorer/chainswap node (nearly done), but I will try and come up with something to give a bit clearer picture on progress later today.

james

[Griffith]

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

in walletdb.cpp; put // in front of the copy_file line, its only to do with backing up wallet - then compile again.

wut? no. dont do that. then you cant backup a wallet. that doesnt fix the problem. that also breaks the function.

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

i added the fix to git,

#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS

is how you fix that scoped enums for that compiler issue. if you download the new source it should be fixed now.

[GrinZ]

...

i added the fix to git,

#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS

is how you fix that scoped enums for that compiler issue. if you download the new source it should be fixed now.

I download a new source. When i try to build a wallet i have error again

obj/walletdb.o: In function `BackupWallet(CWallet const&, std::string const&)':
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

[pro-investor]

...

i added the fix to git,

#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS

is how you fix that scoped enums for that compiler issue. if you download the new source it should be fixed now.

I download a new source. When i try to build a wallet i have error again

obj/walletdb.o: In function `BackupWallet(CWallet const&, std::string const&)':
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

If you are incompetent then use the precompiled windows or mac wallet. Linux is not for noobs

[TvZ]

FYI, GrinZ isn't incompetent neither a noob.

Hopefully Griffith, Barry or anyone else have the solution for the compile problem.
It's pretty important!

[GrinZ]

...

i added the fix to git,

#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS

is how you fix that scoped enums for that compiler issue. if you download the new source it should be fixed now.

I download a new source. When i try to build a wallet i have error again

obj/walletdb.o: In function `BackupWallet(CWallet const&, std::string const&)':
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

If you are incompetent then use the precompiled windows or mac wallet. Linux is not for noobs

Dear pro-investor!
Unfortunately, income from my site, is barely enough to maintain in working order a pair of very old linux servers. I am happy to buy a new windows or mac server, if you donate enough funds.
Addresses for donations You can find at the bottom of my site. Thank You in advance.

[Majormax]

Hi all,

While i love shilling accounts/trolls hanging shit on supercoin (actin' like they know), it does make me think that a little progress board isnt such a bad idea. Part of the reason that this is taking a while to do, is that there are quite a few separate/large tasks to be achieved before we can even think about launching SuperCoinPlus.

I'm still working on the blockexplorer/chainswap node (nearly done), but I will try and come up with something to give a bit clearer picture on progress later today.

james

Thanks for the update !

[Griffith]

FYI, GrinZ isn't incompetent neither a noob.

Hopefully Griffith, Barry or anyone else have the solution for the compile problem.
It's pretty important!

i already posted a fix before u posted this

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

i added the fix to git,

#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS

is how you fix that scoped enums for that compiler issue. if you download the new source it should be fixed now.