Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 10:00:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-02-05]Terrorists not Using Bitcoin? Politicians Want to Regulate It Anyway  (Read 229 times)
coinzat (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


Young but I'm not that bold


View Profile
February 05, 2016, 11:41:19 AM
 #1

The European Union's law enforcement agency, Europol, has stated, in its recently published report, that the use of Bitcoin in financing terrorist activities has not been confirmed.

"Despite third party reporting suggesting the use of anonymous currencies like Bitcoin by terrorists, there is no evidence however of IS-financing networks in existence."

Despite the clear conclusion reached in this report, another EU bureaucracy arm, the European Commision, has only just come out with a comprehensive package to tackle "terrorist financing". It seems this proposal is more about tightening capital controls than "fighting terrorism," as digital currency economy accounts for only a tiny fraction of global money transfers.

"To prevent their abuse for money laundering and terrorist financing purposes, the Commission proposes to bring virtual currency exchange platforms under the scope of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive, so that these platforms have to apply customer due diligence controls when exchanging virtual for real currencies, ending the anonymity associated with such exchanges," the EC press release states.

Read more: http://cointelegraph.com/news/terrorists-not-using-bitcoin-politicians-want-to-regulate-it-anyway
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
1713909657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713909657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713909657
Reply with quote  #2

1713909657
Report to moderator
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
February 05, 2016, 03:29:43 PM
 #2

There are always ulterior motives with politicians. The unregulated environment pose a problem to them because they cannot stop people from moving

money between borders. { The limitations they put on that are there to protect their own interest, not the person who worked for that } The terrorism

funding has to be stopped, and with that I do not have a problem... but how do you find a balance between doing that and not infringing on people's

privacy? Is it really necessary to know, what I spend all my money on? Can I trust the centralized entity to protect that data? If this happens, I would

much rather switch back to cash, because it would be more anonymous.  Tongue

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!