jugador (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
February 06, 2016, 08:36:54 PM |
|
Gavin Andresen Requests Feedback for His Version of BIP-102
Block size debate, who is not familiar with it? The arguments are slowly cooling down as most of the Bitcoin community is favoring Bitcoin Classic. Bitcoin Classic proposes an increase of block size from 1 MB to 2 MB to accommodate growing transactions on the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin Classic calls for a hard fork in the blockchain to introduce the change in block size. Recently in an email, Gavin Andresen has called for constructive feedback for his variation of Jeff Garzik’s BIP-102. BIP-102 was proposed by Jeff Garzik, one of the few Bitcoin Core developers last year. Like Bitcoin Classic, BIP-102 also calls for a 1 MB increase in block size. While asking for feedback on the modified BIP-102 proposal, Gavin Andresen provides insights to his rationale behind certain points made in the proposal. In an ordinary circumstance, increasing the block size is not a very big deal. Making a small change in the code, where maximum block size limit is changed by 1 MB to 2 MB should do the trick. However, in reality especially with lots of people relying on the blockchain for bitcoin transactions and miners constantly working to process these transactions while they search for new blocks makes such a simple modification impossible. In order to make the transition as smooth as possible, a series of codes needs to be modified and tested q multiple times for any bugs that can potentially break the Bitcoin network. http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/02/06/gavin-andresen-feedback-request/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Lethn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 06, 2016, 10:58:41 PM |
|
Mmmm... good, if the blocksize debate ends then that means I have cleared two main conditions for a huge bitcoin price rise, it's nice to see more detail about this from the news articles.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
February 06, 2016, 11:23:18 PM |
|
Mmmm... good, if the blocksize debate ends then that means I have cleared two main conditions for a huge bitcoin price rise, it's nice to see more detail about this from the news articles.
Have any other core devs commented? Why couldn't this just be merged into the reference implementation or whatever?
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
Lethn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 06, 2016, 11:33:01 PM |
|
Mmmm... good, if the blocksize debate ends then that means I have cleared two main conditions for a huge bitcoin price rise, it's nice to see more detail about this from the news articles.
Have any other core devs commented? Why couldn't this just be merged into the reference implementation or whatever? I wouldn't know enough about the technical bits, the fact that they seem to be talking again and actually working on the code instead of bickering is a good sign though.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
February 06, 2016, 11:34:45 PM |
|
Mmmm... good, if the blocksize debate ends then that means I have cleared two main conditions for a huge bitcoin price rise, it's nice to see more detail about this from the news articles.
Have any other core devs commented? Why couldn't this just be merged into the reference implementation or whatever? I wouldn't know enough about the technical bits, the fact that they seem to be talking again and actually working on the code instead of bickering is a good sign though. One day this war is going to end.
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3068
|
|
February 07, 2016, 12:56:44 AM |
|
One day this war is going to end.
It ended about 5 times already, but some people are bad losers. Or "winners don't quit!" as I'm sure their weirdo double-speak would have you believe.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
February 07, 2016, 03:57:31 AM |
|
One day this war is going to end.
It ended about 5 times already, but some people are bad losers. Or "winners don't quit!" as I'm sure their weirdo double-speak would have you believe. Isn't Core free to review and possibly accept this BIP?
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073
|
|
February 07, 2016, 07:09:30 AM |
|
I hope he waits for the feedback, before he submits his next Bip proposal. He jumps from one Bip to the next every other week... it just depends on what mood he is in, or what he thinks might give him a foot in the door to get into the lead maintainer position again. They took a 360 degree turn from suggesting a benevolent dictator for Bitcoin to asking feedback and working with the community to make changes. Is he playing the crowd?
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
February 07, 2016, 12:28:01 PM |
|
I hope he waits for the feedback, before he submits his next Bip proposal. He jumps from one Bip to the next every other week... it just depends on what mood he is in, or what he thinks might give him a foot in the door to get into the lead maintainer position again. They took a 360 degree turn from suggesting a benevolent dictator for Bitcoin to asking feedback and working with the community to make changes. Is he playing the crowd? Here's the way I see it. I could see it wrong, but: I don't think either of these implementations were started by Gavin. Maybe by contributing to them he's trying to mitigate the damage? If there's a slim chance the new fork will take hold, isn't it better to have him get the code right first at least?
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
|