A true Martingale system for sports ;D

[BitcoinSupremo]

 Hi guys

First of all I am a girl who like sports betting. I have been thinking a lot of how to implement the Martingale system in sports betting in real life.
I am going to show you my idea , which is quite simple, but is appealing only to very disciplined and experienced players.

Its easy, first you pick a team which has been always middle of table in standings or a bit lower, but not too much.
You start betting with 0.01 BTC and double this sum every time until you win. Odds of course must 2 or more to achieve this.
1 Bet-0.01
2 Bet-0.02
3 Bet-0.04
4 Bet-0.08
5 Bet-0.16
6 Bet-0.32
7 Bet-0.64
8-Bet-1.32

About 3 BTC needed for this if you play 8 matches, and 1.4 BTC if you try the seven match martingale system.
In 8 times playing at home ground the middle team should win at list 1 time to make sure you make profit. Profit varies at which number of bet the team wins.

I want to try this with Premier League, or lower English divisions as they have very good odds 

This is only a suggestion, I am not responsible if you lose a lot of money, not my fault in anyway, you decide what to do with your Bitcoins.

[1713886693]

1713886693

[bajing]

if you have calculate like that, i will give big applause for you when you can reach your goals. i'm not good gambler in sports book but as i know is really hard win if you always picks winning odds x2 in every bet you made.

[Chemistry1988]

...
6 Bet-0.32
7 Bet-0.64
8-Bet-1.32

Why isn't the bet size on the 8th bet 1.28 btc (=0.64 * 2) but 1.32? Anyway, the problem of martingale in sports betting is the same as in dice or roulette, that is while it is unlikely for you to hit a long streak, you will hit it eventually when you keep betting and will lose all your money.

[SyGambler]

it's really hard to achieve 8 winning streak with X2 odds or more
in my opinion players should use the normal marinagle in sports betting , no need to keep doubling when you win cause it's so hard to achieve 8 streak
but at the end it's all about the experience , if you found it good then go for it

[Chemistry1988]

it's really hard to achieve 8 winning streak with X2 odds or more
in my opinion players should use the normal marinagle in sports betting , no need to keep doubling when you win cause it's so hard to achieve 8 streak
but at the end it's all about the experience , if you found it good then go for it

It seems to me you have misunderstood her plan. She was suggesting people to "double the bet size until they win" rather than "double the bet size when they win", so it is pretty much the normal martingale.

[SyGambler]

it's really hard to achieve 8 winning streak with X2 odds or more
in my opinion players should use the normal marinagle in sports betting , no need to keep doubling when you win cause it's so hard to achieve 8 streak
but at the end it's all about the experience , if you found it good then go for it

It seems to me you have misunderstood her plan. She was suggesting people to "double the bet size until they win" rather than "double the bet size when they win", so it is pretty much the normal martingale.

ahh I thought she was suggesting to double the bet when you win till you achieve that amount
so basically this is just martinagle , not A True Martinagle System 

[twister]

It could work but if for some reason the team you picked fails to win atleast one time during those 8 bets then you're down 3 BTC. It is risky, I bet on sports a lot and I'd say there are other better/less-riskier ways of making money with it.

[plost24]

This is not a great methode for winning you the best chance to win always have a low odds so there is no need to do odds x2 you can win beter if you aim bet with low odds

[socks435]

This is not a great methode for winning you the best chance to win always have a low odds so there is no need to do odds x2 you can win beter if you aim bet with low odds

Good idea but this is not the best way to win straight sometimes you will lose so if you do the martingale i think you will not lose if you follow this method.
But it will still base in luck and there's no perfect strategy that you can win straight..

[xetsr]

Its easy, first you pick a team which has been always middle of table in standings or a bit lower, but not too much.

It's not as easy as you think. You can't just pick a team, you have to do some serious research. This might have a chance at working if you're a professional handicapper but if not, you would have a better chance at provably fair dice.

Odds of course must 2 or more to achieve this

You usually have less chance of winning when odds are 2 or more. So when betting blind, theoretically you would lose more times then win which means the sample size should be much greater then 8.

[quentincole32]

It could work but if for some reason the team you picked fails to win atleast one time during those 8 bets then you're down 3 BTC. It is risky, I bet on sports a lot and I'd say there are other better/less-riskier ways of making money with it.

If you do this method on top teams for example in soccer like Bayern Munich, Barcelona, real Madrid and Paris saint Germain which they dominated the league you won't lost that much in 3 weeks consecutively,  the odds are pretty low around 1.3 or less but it's almost guaranteed just try it .

[xetsr]

It could work but if for some reason the team you picked fails to win atleast one time during those 8 bets then you're down 3 BTC. It is risky, I bet on sports a lot and I'd say there are other better/less-riskier ways of making money with it.

If you do this method on top teams for example in soccer like Bayern Munich, Barcelona, real Madrid and Paris saint Germain which they dominated the league you won't lost that much in 3 weeks consecutively,  the odds are pretty low around 1.3 or less but it's almost guaranteed just try it .

It only takes one lose to set you back a good amount though. These times do eventually lose or draw. Don't forget that!

[BitcoinSupremo]

I mean you should make just a simple win in 8 matches where the team plays at home, English division 1 or 2 I have checked that rarely a team of middle standings will not win for 8 consecutive wins. If you win at lets say 3rd try which is 0.04 BTC, you start again with another team, another championship and starts over from 0.01 BTC.

Of course if you do this with known teams, well its much more probable that you win early. After each win start over.

And yes it should be 1.28 BTC the 8th time, my error.

And yes its a big risk through this strategy, but remember this is gambling, nothing is guaranteed.

[lolnabtc]

but would it really work
I think it must in short term, however, still dunno in long...

[adaseb]

It sounds good but its highly unlikely you will be able to achieve that many wins in a row. It doesn't seem so much different from regular dice unless you got better odds at sports.

[quentincole32]

It could work but if for some reason the team you picked fails to win atleast one time during those 8 bets then you're down 3 BTC. It is risky, I bet on sports a lot and I'd say there are other better/less-riskier ways of making money with it.

If you do this method on top teams for example in soccer like Bayern Munich, Barcelona, real Madrid and Paris saint Germain which they dominated the league you won't lost that much in 3 weeks consecutively,  the odds are pretty low around 1.3 or less but it's almost guaranteed just try it .

It only takes one lose to set you back a good amount though. These times do eventually lose or draw. Don't forget that!

Then tripled the bet amount to set it back to previous profit, pretty simple as i practiced this lately.
Don't forget too a teams like I've mentioned above rarely get lost or draw that's why their odds always low, they dominated the league.

[shanem]

Hi guys

First of all I am a girl who like sports betting. I have been thinking a lot of how to implement the Martingale system in sports betting in real life.
I am going to show you my idea , which is quite simple, but is appealing only to very disciplined and experienced players.

Its easy, first you pick a team which has been always middle of table in standings or a bit lower, but not too much.
You start betting with 0.01 BTC and double this sum every time until you win. Odds of course must 2 or more to achieve this.
1 Bet-0.01
2 Bet-0.02
3 Bet-0.04
4 Bet-0.08
5 Bet-0.16
6 Bet-0.32
7 Bet-0.64
8-Bet-1.32

About 3 BTC needed for this if you play 8 matches, and 1.4 BTC if you try the seven match martingale system.
In 8 times playing at home ground the middle team should win at list 1 time to make sure you make profit. Profit varies at which number of bet the team wins.

I want to try this with Premier League, or lower English divisions as they have very good odds 

This is only a suggestion, I am not responsible if you lose a lot of money, not my fault in anyway, you decide what to do with your Bitcoins.

This martingale will fail if you are betting on Chelsea to win. I remember Chelsea not winning most of their games from the start of the season till now. You could have easily got busted if you do that in sports.

[Phildo]

First, martingale is stupid, period.

Second, it is especially stupid for making money line bets, especially on a sport like soccer.

The only reason martingale "works" is because the odds and the payouts are (close to) 50/50 2x. Each soccer match has different odds and payouts, and that needs to be factored into whatever you are doing. What happens if the team you pick has a long losing streak? Or what if the schedule is such that the only games that they win have a lower payout than 2x?

[BitcoinSupremo]

Thank you guys for your feedback. So based on what is said here, I think to better not risk this high amount of BTC to try this system.
I had just an idea and wanted to share, to see reactions 

So final word is not worthy.

[dothebeats]

Increasing it by *2 seems to be a thing for those with big bankrolls. Also, there aren't sure profits to be gained in a sports bet. This is one method to lose your money fast than any other gambling methods there is. If it works for you then great, but most of the time it wouldn't.