I recieved the payment but i can't withdraw for some reason. Can you PM me and I will send you an address so you can send them to me? I was counting on this money to pay some bills so I need them quick, but they are stuck and can't withdraw.
I'm having the same issue regarding my inability to withdraw the BTC that I had received into my Betking account.
A few hours ago, I contacted the Betking administrator through the website in order to attempt to resolve the matter and withdraw the coins.
The administrator responded to my message and said that he is working on my matter. However, still a few hours later, the coins are not showing as eligible for withdrawal.
I noticed that I was unable to as well before I placed some bets as my balance changed. It was 0.0096btc then it changed from 0.03btc back down to 0.0096btc and then back to 0.03btc when I only bet small amount at a time of 0.0001btc. I was able to withdraw eventually but after playing some hands.
In order to withdraw my funds from the BitKing website, I did not go so far as making any attempt to gamble with my signature campaign proceeds.
After a few hours from my initial inquiry (and several back and forths), BitKing's admin was able to point out a matter related to my browser that allowed me to switch internet devices and to successfully withdraw my signature campaign funds.
Overall I am a bit disappointed with how the ending of this campaign was handled. Yes, I am glad that I was paid for my one week participation, but my participation in the signature campaign for the one week that I was in ended up being a lot of work for the amount of payment that I received.
Personally, I believe that any entity (or persons) running a signature campaign in these forums should be responsible for reasonably informing signature campaign participants that a campaign will be ending in a reasonable time, which in most cases would be several days before the campaign ends. In this case, as far as I know, we were not informed about the signature campaign ending until after it had already ended, and even the substance of that notice was quite ambiguous with signature campaign leaders seeming to be purposefully ambiguous and being snippy in response to inquiries for clarification of meaning.
I don't want to go on about this point because I think I adequately made my assertions, and in the end, because of the lack of notice regarding the end of this signature campaign, I needed to scramble to find another signature campaign which luckily I was able to do.. which may not be the case for others.
I wish luck to administrators of this campaign in their future endeavors and luck to signature campaign participants to find another signature campaign without having to scramble too much.
As far as me being snippy if half of you would take the time to read the thread at all for the company you "work" for then youd see i answer the same question 20 times a week because ppl are too lazt to do their own work and research a question. It gets old pretty quick especially when someone asks a question that was just answered 1-2 posts above theirs.
Also regarding the campaign ending and you having to scramble where exactly do you find that the fault of the manager? When you sign up youre basically signing up for a pay period, youre not guaranteed a certain time the campaign will run at all IMO. Youre guaranteed it will be at least a pay period.
Honestly being allowed in a signature program is a privilege not a right. Its also at will employment basically. Meaning they can terminate a program at anytime they deem necessary as long as they pay participants what is owed. Sorry youre upset with the length the campaign ran but if you bothered to read a week ago youd have seen the owner say he will run another week if i agree. That basically told everyone then the campaign would run another week.
Idk in the end ill just place you on my do not hire list from now on so i dont have to worry about you being disappointed. Sorry you feel the way you do and good luck in other campaigns
I think your post pretty much took my point further than it needed to be taken and likely much more personal than it needed to be taken.
If you want to publicly chose to announce that you create blacklists against forum members based on their feedback about your campaign, then that is your choice.
I understand that a manager of a campaign has a lot of responsibilities, including some of the responsibilities of redundancies like you indicated and also responsibilities to communicate with persons (and entities) that he manages and choosing how to respond to feedback, including public or quasi-public feedback.
I am very familiar with power dynamics of employment relationships (including traditional employment relationships and otherwise), and even though your depiction of relationships within a signature campaign may resemble those of an employment relationship, there are also differences and tensions within your description (or possibly analogy that you are making).
Surely, each of us may not understand the knowledge or resources of persons in any forum context beyond their posts, and in this regard there can be some cultural obstacles and differences, and there can be a bit of a wild west within relationships of these kinds of forum spaces...
In any event, each of us choses how we are going to present ourselves, project our reputations or the extent to which we chose to retaliate against others due to differences of opinion, whether the power of the relationship be in our favor or otherwise.
I wish you luck and the best concerning how you chose to deal with these kinds of communications in the future.
