Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2017, 03:54:29 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-02-12] Hard Fork Conspiracy Treacherous  (Read 246 times)
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2016, 08:19:57 AM
 #1

Hard Fork Conspiracy Treacherous

Bitcoin Classic and BitcoinXT (meaning in this case the new resulting currency itself rather than the software) would likely be considered by FinCEN to be a new convertible virtual currency. FinCEN has made it clear that a creator of such convertible virtual currency, who issues such currency in order to sell those units for either real currency or its equivalent (including presumably an exchange with current bitcoin), is deemed to be a money transmitter.

http://www.riddellwilliams.com/blog/articles/post/hard-fork-conspiracy-treacherous

1513137269
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513137269

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513137269
Reply with quote  #2

1513137269
Report to moderator
1513137269
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513137269

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513137269
Reply with quote  #2

1513137269
Report to moderator
1513137269
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513137269

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513137269
Reply with quote  #2

1513137269
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ArticMine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086


Monero Core Team


View Profile
February 12, 2016, 08:51:30 PM
 #2

Hard Fork Conspiracy Treacherous

Bitcoin Classic and BitcoinXT (meaning in this case the new resulting currency itself rather than the software) would likely be considered by FinCEN to be a new convertible virtual currency. FinCEN has made it clear that a creator of such convertible virtual currency, who issues such currency in order to sell those units for either real currency or its equivalent (including presumably an exchange with current bitcoin), is deemed to be a money transmitter.

http://www.riddellwilliams.com/blog/articles/post/hard-fork-conspiracy-treacherous

I would suggest before reaching any conclusions on this to read the actual FinCEN guidance on the subject:
https://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html
Further clarification for mining
https://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R001.pdf
In article the author does not reference the guidance or the difference between a de-centralized virtual currency and a centralized virtual currency. He also does not provide any justification for his implicit claim that Bitcoin Classic and Bitcoin XT are centralized virtual currencies as per the FinCEN guidance while Bitcoin Core is not.  

Concerned that blockchain bloat will lead to centralization? Storing less than 4 GB of data once required the budget of a superpower and a warehouse full of punched cards. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/IBM_card_storage.NARA.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!