MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS

[mainpmf]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

[Spendulus]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

[bryant.coleman]

Wrong. I'm Hungarian, and we have a couple of hundred years of hands on experience with these "harmless and peaceful" muslims .

BTW you shouldn't let neither your positive or negative preconceptions to blur your sight. I've noticed that you don't like us whites, but why do you think that these brownie muslim fellas had been more compassionate to your kind than we were?

The problem with the Blacks is that they always blame the Whites for all of their problems. For example, for the blacks, the slave trade was exclusively conducted by the Whites. But what is the truth? The Europeans engaged in the slave trade for a relatively short period of time (from 17th to 19th century AD). But what about the Arabs and the Turks? They have been doing slave trade for thousands of years. The number of slaves transported from the East coast of Africa by the Arabs is many times that number during the Atlantic slave trade.

[yugo23]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

yeah of course as Islam is incredibly younger than Christianity. But what is said is still true. Compare what can be compared...

[yugo23]

Wrong. I'm Hungarian, and we have a couple of hundred years of hands on experience with these "harmless and peaceful" muslims .

BTW you shouldn't let neither your positive or negative preconceptions to blur your sight. I've noticed that you don't like us whites, but why do you think that these brownie muslim fellas had been more compassionate to your kind than we were?

The problem with the Blacks is that they always blame the Whites for all of their problems. For example, for the blacks, the slave trade was exclusively conducted by the Whites. But what is the truth? The Europeans engaged in the slave trade for a relatively short period of time (from 17th to 19th century AD). But what about the Arabs and the Turks? They have been doing slave trade for thousands of years. The number of slaves transported from the East coast of Africa by the Arabs is many times that number during the Atlantic slave trade.

The problem with the Whites is that they always blame for the Blacks for all their problems. For example, though Whites control the whole world economy and every piece of important ressource, they still blame the migrants for stealing their jobs and their money...

[Spendulus]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

yeah of course as Islam is incredibly younger than Christianity. But what is said is still true. Compare what can be compared...

Sure, compare what can be compared.


Islam isn't "incredibly young," it is some 1400 years old compared to 2000. 

You might well argue, though, that the rigid and unchanging nature of Islam causes it to be retarded forever, to the extent that it remains rigid and unchanging.

[criptix]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

yeah of course as Islam is incredibly younger than Christianity. But what is said is still true. Compare what can be compared...

Sure, compare what can be compared.


Islam isn't "incredibly young," it is some 1400 years old compared to 2000. 

You might well argue, though, that the rigid and unchanging nature of Islam causes it to be retarded forever, to the extent that it remains rigid and unchanging.

It is just 100-200 years gone since christianity was as violent as islam.

[yugo23]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

yeah of course as Islam is incredibly younger than Christianity. But what is said is still true. Compare what can be compared...

Sure, compare what can be compared.


Islam isn't "incredibly young," it is some 1400 years old compared to 2000. 

You might well argue, though, that the rigid and unchanging nature of Islam causes it to be retarded forever, to the extent that it remains rigid and unchanging.

Yeah lol, 600 years of delay is not a lot at all!

Compare Islam with 1400 years old Christianity then! You'll see it's pretty similar...

[yugo23]

....
What would be right is to consider Muslims and Christians violence on the long term. Here I'm pretty sure both would be rather similar as Islam is much younger! But currently Islam is killing more.

What would be right is to give you a 1950s television to watch and we more modern people will have our computers  and Netflix.  Both are very similar!

Sigh...
If you want to compare two things compare similar things. Trying to compare Christianity and Islam is like trying to compare a 8 years old boy with an adult. Yes they're both humans but no they're not going to do the same things ><

+1, but only if it is the "christians" who are the adult and the 8 year old boy who is the "muslim."

yeah of course as Islam is incredibly younger than Christianity. But what is said is still true. Compare what can be compared...

Sure, compare what can be compared.


Islam isn't "incredibly young," it is some 1400 years old compared to 2000. 

You might well argue, though, that the rigid and unchanging nature of Islam causes it to be retarded forever, to the extent that it remains rigid and unchanging.

It is just 100-200 years gone since christianity was as violent as islam.

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

[craked5]

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

Which is why Islam shouldn't be considered as worse than Christianity.

They want to kill Muslims? Well they can I don't care religious are all fagots. But don't try to find false excuses ^^

[Spendulus]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

[mainpmf]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Here. 15 million deaths for Christianity, 2 million for Islam.
https://www.quora.com/Which-religion-is-responsible-for-the-greatest-number-of-deaths-of-infidels-over-its-entire-history

[criptix]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Seriously? Please cite your source.

Every source in german and english i checked are going into 5-6 figit numbers from around 1500-1650 lol

Are you by chance lying or did you talked about a single small village?

You ppl get more desperate each day.

[Spendulus]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Seriously? Please cite your source.

Every source in german and english i checked are going into 5-6 figit numbers from around 1500-1650 lol

Are you by chance lying or did you talked about a single small village?

You ppl get more desperate each day.

It's easy enough to just look it up, isn't it?

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060903192705AAZ0Dnd

Modern historians have begun to study the documentary records of the Inquisition. The archives of the Suprema, today held by the National Historical Archive of Spain (Archivo Histórico Nacional), conserves the annual relations of all processes between 1560 and 1700. This material provides information about 49,092 judgements, the latter studied by Gustav Henningsen and Jaime Contreras. These authors calculate that only 1.9% of those processed were burned at the stake.



The archives of the Suprema only provide information surrounding the processes prior to 1560. To study the processes themselves it is necessary to examine the archives of the local tribunals, however the majority....

[criptix]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Seriously? Please cite your source.

Every source in german and english i checked are going into 5-6 figit numbers from around 1500-1650 lol

Are you by chance lying or did you talked about a single small village?

You ppl get more desperate each day.

It's easy enough to just look it up, isn't it?

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060903192705AAZ0Dnd

Modern historians have begun to study the documentary records of the Inquisition. The archives of the Suprema, today held by the National Historical Archive of Spain (Archivo Histórico Nacional), conserves the annual relations of all processes between 1560 and 1700. This material provides information about 49,092 judgements, the latter studied by Gustav Henningsen and Jaime Contreras. These authors calculate that only 1.9% of those processed were burned at the stake.



The archives of the Suprema only provide information surrounding the processes prior to 1560. To study the processes themselves it is necessary to examine the archives of the local tribunals, however the majority....

The numbers your cited are wrong then, you cited wrong or you are obviously lying.

Also do you know what "controversial disputed" means?

Also you know that the spanish inquistion was one beside three? There was also the german and portugese inquisition.

Im not a expert so i will let wiki explain:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition

You are welcome to refute

[bryant.coleman]

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Inquisition was not the worst atrocity perpetrated by Christianity. The genocide of the native Americans by the Catholic church was the worst atrocity perpetrated by anyone in the human history. Consider these:

1. The native population of Mexico reduced to 25 million to 1 million in less than 100 years.
2. The Taino/Carib population of the West Indies (8 million) completely exterminated in 60 years.
3. The native Brazilian population reduced from 15 million to 1 million in 100 years.

[mainpmf]

....

Let's be large and say 400 years. 400 years we're totally sure that Christianity was fucking more violent than Islam now ^^

+1

LOL.

Islam today is religion of peace comparing to Christianity 500 years ago.  Inquisition was way worse than ISIS.

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Here. 15 million deaths for Christianity, 2 million for Islam.
https://www.quora.com/Which-religion-is-responsible-for-the-greatest-number-of-deaths-of-infidels-over-its-entire-history

ok seems like nobody cares for my numbers xD

[TECSHARE]

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Inquisition was not the worst atrocity perpetrated by Christianity. The genocide of the native Americans by the Catholic church was the worst atrocity perpetrated by anyone in the human history. Consider these:

1. The native population of Mexico reduced to 25 million to 1 million in less than 100 years.
2. The Taino/Carib population of the West Indies (8 million) completely exterminated in 60 years.
3. The native Brazilian population reduced from 15 million to 1 million in 100 years.

To be fair here, not all of this extermination was a direct result of Christianity, a lot of it was plain old greed and conquest independent of religion.

[eon89]

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Inquisition was not the worst atrocity perpetrated by Christianity. The genocide of the native Americans by the Catholic church was the worst atrocity perpetrated by anyone in the human history. Consider these:

1. The native population of Mexico reduced to 25 million to 1 million in less than 100 years.
2. The Taino/Carib population of the West Indies (8 million) completely exterminated in 60 years.
3. The native Brazilian population reduced from 15 million to 1 million in 100 years.

To be fair here, not all of this extermination was a direct result of Christianity, a lot of it was plain old greed and conquest independent of religion.

Well, truth be told, most of religion is about greed and conquest.

[TECSHARE]

No, the Inquisition did not approach the atrocities of ISIS.

It's estimated that from 1540-1700  ( a period of time we have good records for ) the Spanish Inquisition killed between 3000 and 5000 people.

So 160 years of the worst of Christianity matches two months or so of violent Muslim killings.

Inquisition was not the worst atrocity perpetrated by Christianity. The genocide of the native Americans by the Catholic church was the worst atrocity perpetrated by anyone in the human history. Consider these:

1. The native population of Mexico reduced to 25 million to 1 million in less than 100 years.
2. The Taino/Carib population of the West Indies (8 million) completely exterminated in 60 years.
3. The native Brazilian population reduced from 15 million to 1 million in 100 years.

To be fair here, not all of this extermination was a direct result of Christianity, a lot of it was plain old greed and conquest independent of religion.

Well, truth be told, most of religion is about greed and conquest.

You can debate that all day. I think the important point is that the primary driver was not religious ideology, but greed, as opposed to modern Muslim extremism which is very clearly motivated primarily by ideology.