Bitcoin Forum
April 16, 2024, 06:12:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-02-20]Bitcoin Roundtable May Have Found an Agreeable Solution for Block Si  (Read 323 times)
UNOE (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 791
Merit: 271


This is personal


View Profile
February 20, 2016, 07:53:04 PM
 #1

Bitcoin network may be eventually heading towards the hard fork even after the Bitcoin Roundtable community disagreed with the idea of creating a hard fork of blockchain. According to the community, there is a possibility of the hard fork creating two separate blockchains that do not communicate with each other. In such circumstances, the whole bitcoin network can be segmented into two versions, one that works and another that doesn’t.

The prolonged bitcoin debate has not paved the way for any concrete solutions towards increasing the block size. Many proposals so far have been shot down by one or more powerful members of the community. The latest proposal to be shot down was the Bitcoin Classic. Bitcoin Classic had proposed a hard fork to increase the block size from the existing 1 MB to 2 MB. Initially, it received support from various quarters until the Bitcoin Roundtable decided that it will not consent hard-forking bitcoin network due to potential risks involved. According to the Bitcoin Roundtable – a community of bitcoin miners, mining pools, wallet providers, exchanges and other bitcoin-based businesses, the hard fork can result in two different blockchain versions that are incompatible with each other. It may cause huge losses to bitcoin users on the network.

http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/02/20/bitcoin-roundtable-block-size-issue/

Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713291168
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291168

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291168
Reply with quote  #2

1713291168
Report to moderator
1713291168
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713291168

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713291168
Reply with quote  #2

1713291168
Report to moderator
rebuilder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 21, 2016, 08:02:12 AM
 #2

Man, where do they find these writers? It seems this one doesn't have a clue what he's writing about. For example, " two different blockchain versions that are incompatible with each other" isn't something a hard fork can result in, it's the definition of a hard fork.

Selling out to advertisers shows you respect neither yourself nor the rest of us.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Too many low-quality posts? Mods not keeping things clean enough? Self-moderated threads let you keep signature spammers and trolls out!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!