Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 12:21:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Batch #1 Ships  (Read 238869 times)
Korbman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 29, 2013, 10:34:27 PM
 #861

Well, that's not so far fetched. Think about it this way...who would you rather believe, a truthful man who once told a lie or a lying man who once told the truth?

It's a lot easier to believe a person when they're up front and honest with you the entire time, even if what they end up saying at the end is a blatant lie. To listen to a deceptive man keep you in the dark, but then present you with the truth, is vastly more difficult to take seriously. That's why even with these latest images, there will still be huge shadows of doubt cast over the Avalon team.

[...]
aside from those 2 points, i think most people are annoyed with the lack of information rather than misinformation.

Technically, a lie can be defined as anything that gives (or is meant to give) a false impression, whether through misinformation, confusion, changing topics, omission, etc. It's not necessarily about what words were spoken or unspoken, but rather the intentions of the person.

That said, I don't think I have anything to add to your list (nor have I looked). I was just trying to make a basic point  Cheesy

I'm sure we'll all have our answers with the next couple weeks.

1713918092
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713918092

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713918092
Reply with quote  #2

1713918092
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713918092
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713918092

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713918092
Reply with quote  #2

1713918092
Report to moderator
1713918092
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713918092

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713918092
Reply with quote  #2

1713918092
Report to moderator
1713918092
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713918092

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713918092
Reply with quote  #2

1713918092
Report to moderator
RoboCoder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 250


Save A Life, Adopt a Pet Today!


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2013, 10:46:36 PM
 #862

aside from those 2 points, i think most people are annoyed with the lack of information rather than misinformation.

And yet batch #1 sold out fast..  and batch #2 will also I will bet..
kaerf
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 631
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 10:51:48 PM
 #863

I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.

can we infer that jeff's package has not left china, but bitsyncom still expects delivery around thursday? i guess it's possible. if thursday delivery, then jeff should have a tracking number by tomorrow at the latest.


EDIT: didn't yifu say he paid $400 to get it out of the country? if that's the case, then either he wasted his money or what he told you is incorrect, or he is withholding the tracking number.
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1003


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 10:56:09 PM
 #864

I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.

can we infer that jeff's package has not left china, but bitsyncom still expects delivery around thursday? i guess it's possible. if thursday delivery, then jeff should have a tracking number by tomorrow at the latest.
I failed to ask Yifu the weight of each Avalon device. (To figure out why the paid so much for Jeffs delivery)

$400 is a pretty hefty sum of money. I suppose they must have paid extra to ensure extra quick delivery. The only way to know for sure is by posing the question to him.

Best guess, Chinas customs office is being a pain.
rchapoteau
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
January 29, 2013, 10:57:14 PM
 #865

Quote from: kaerf link=topic=137534.msg1488973
2) they said they would give jeff a tracking number, but haven't done that. apparently, difficulty with shipping/customs is causing problems...i agree that failure to at least address this issue is a problem.

aside from those 2 points, i think most people are annoyed with the lack of information rather than misinformation.


I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.

 . . . what???  I've ordered several products straight from mainland China last year that I was able to track while it was still in China, and it came through DHL.  I can't be 100% sure when they issued me the tracking number in relation to when it cleared customs, but I know I had it before it came to America.  

On the flip side of that, I do remember the the tracking info didn't seem accurate until it did arrive in America.

Edit: As a side note, almost every time I have done it, it has taken about 2 weeks to get the product even with faster shipping.
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1003


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 11:01:37 PM
 #866

 Grin

Keep in mind that customs does not work outside at sea in some barge. Chinas customs are usually at ports within China.

If you could track down what kind of package it was (electronics?) and when you actually got a tracking number that may be useful information.
SellingMyGPUs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 11:02:04 PM
 #867

I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.
That is how it works when you use an HK forwarder...
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1003


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 11:03:51 PM
 #868

I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.
That is how it works when you use an HK forwarder...
Perhaps that is the company they contracted to take care of the shipping paperwork. Customs broker of some kind or a Forwarder.

Might explain why they are sending shipment in clumps instead of FIFO.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 29, 2013, 11:12:46 PM
 #869



almost 70GH/s
Well again, as I said before, Xiangfu wrote the driver for cgminer.
When he was asking me about it, 2.10.4 was already available.

That output looks legit.

Weird that the date is indeed 24-Jan i.e. more than 6 days ago.

1359050115 = 24-Jan-2012 17:55:15 UTC

China timezone would be 2am or 3am (not 100% sure which - anyone can look it up)

Yes runtime is 503 seconds.

Hardware Errors = 7 means it's not perfect or it's got some form of overclocking that is already pushing the limit of the device ... or a minor bug somewhere in the driver/cgminer combo Smiley

They ran the test with GetWork and 1 difficulty shares - bad idea with ASIC Tongue Use Stratum and something like 8+ difficulty ...
(I use 8 difficulty on my 2.4GH/s Tongue)

29 Rejects means there must have been a block change (LP) ... and Network Blocks = 2 says yes there was 1 block change.

So 29 Rejects on a single LP sounds reasonable for ~60GH/s on GetWork

The numbers Elapsed, Total MH, MHS av, Difficulty Accepted, Accepted, Utility, Work Utility all calculate out to the right arena.

And lastly - yes that output matches: "java API summary"

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
smracer
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1055
Merit: 1020



View Profile
January 30, 2013, 02:50:16 AM
 #870

So it ran for 503 seconds before it melted?
xempew
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 10



View Profile
January 30, 2013, 03:32:26 AM
 #871

Ah, fantastic.

When is the re-up? The site isn't taking the next batch of orders yet.

We see no reason to hold your money while we ship the first batch of units, not to mention CNY.

We will take orders soon as we feel we have adequately taking care of streamlining shipping of the first batch.

any progress with streamlining shipping of the first batch yet?

In Satoshi We Trust.
tbcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
January 30, 2013, 03:34:27 AM
 #872

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=139960.0 Huh

Sorry for my bad english Wink
Bitcoin card for deposit and payment + Little POS
Donations:1N65efiNUhH6sEQg7Z6oUC76kJS9Yhevyf
themaskedone
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 08:43:07 AM
 #873

http://puu.sh/1UyQ8

almost 70GH/s
Well again, as I said before, Xiangfu wrote the driver for cgminer.
When he was asking me about it, 2.10.4 was already available.

That output looks legit.

Weird that the date is indeed 24-Jan i.e. more than 6 days ago.

1359050115 = 24-Jan-2012 17:55:15 UTC

China timezone would be 2am or 3am (not 100% sure which - anyone can look it up)

Yes runtime is 503 seconds.

Hardware Errors = 7 means it's not perfect or it's got some form of overclocking that is already pushing the limit of the device ... or a minor bug somewhere in the driver/cgminer combo Smiley

They ran the test with GetWork and 1 difficulty shares - bad idea with ASIC Tongue Use Stratum and something like 8+ difficulty ...
(I use 8 difficulty on my 2.4GH/s Tongue)

29 Rejects means there must have been a block change (LP) ... and Network Blocks = 2 says yes there was 1 block change.

So 29 Rejects on a single LP sounds reasonable for ~60GH/s on GetWork

The numbers Elapsed, Total MH, MHS av, Difficulty Accepted, Accepted, Utility, Work Utility all calculate out to the right arena.

And lastly - yes that output matches: "java API summary"

2012 ? We are in 2013.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 30, 2013, 08:53:53 AM
 #874



almost 70GH/s
Well again, as I said before, Xiangfu wrote the driver for cgminer.
When he was asking me about it, 2.10.4 was already available.

That output looks legit.

Weird that the date is indeed 24-Jan i.e. more than 6 days ago.

1359050115 = 24-Jan-2012 17:55:15 UTC

China timezone would be 2am or 3am (not 100% sure which - anyone can look it up)

Yes runtime is 503 seconds.

Hardware Errors = 7 means it's not perfect or it's got some form of overclocking that is already pushing the limit of the device ... or a minor bug somewhere in the driver/cgminer combo Smiley

They ran the test with GetWork and 1 difficulty shares - bad idea with ASIC Tongue Use Stratum and something like 8+ difficulty ...
(I use 8 difficulty on my 2.4GH/s Tongue)

29 Rejects means there must have been a block change (LP) ... and Network Blocks = 2 says yes there was 1 block change.

So 29 Rejects on a single LP sounds reasonable for ~60GH/s on GetWork

The numbers Elapsed, Total MH, MHS av, Difficulty Accepted, Accepted, Utility, Work Utility all calculate out to the right arena.

And lastly - yes that output matches: "java API summary"

2012 ? We are in 2013.


TIME STAMP: 1359050115

DATE (M/D/Y @ h:m:s): 01 / 24 / 13 @ 11:55:15am EST

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
DobZombie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 532


Former curator of The Bitcoin Museum


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 08:55:03 AM
 #875


2012 ? We are in 2013.



Tip Me if believe BTC1 will hit $1 Million by 2030
1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 09:58:50 AM
 #876

oh please BFL, save us from this misery!

more or less retired.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 11:03:46 AM
 #877

...
2012 ? We are in 2013.
Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
loshia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 11:22:31 AM
Last edit: January 30, 2013, 11:36:37 AM by loshia
 #878



The openwrt trunk revision is 35097

https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/35097/

Changeset 35097
Timestamp:
    Jan 11, 2013 5:44:26 PM (3 weeks ago)



Which seems perfectly fine. Just after chips arrived from the factory about 4-7 of January


Please help the Led Boy aka Bicknellski to make us a nice Christmas led tree and pay WASP membership fee here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643999.msg7191563#msg7191563
And remember Bicknellski is not collecting money from community;D
YipYip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 30, 2013, 11:42:06 AM
 #879

Quote from: kaerf link=topic=137534.msg1488973
2) they said they would give jeff a tracking number, but haven't done that. apparently, difficulty with shipping/customs is causing problems...i agree that failure to at least address this issue is a problem.

aside from those 2 points, i think most people are annoyed with the lack of information rather than misinformation.


I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.

Hey listen honey ..I promise I wont come in your mouth...

The cheque is in the mail...

You only get tracking numbers once you leave china.....

BlahBlahBlah.....what a crock


OBJECT NOT FOUND
server
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 892
Merit: 1002


1 BTC =1 BTC


View Profile
January 30, 2013, 12:19:59 PM
 #880

I just learned from Bitsyncom that tracking numbers aren't generated until they leave mainland China [i.e. Customs]. Then it is handed off to DHL which then generates the tracking number.

I experienced this several times before with packages (fpga's) from NGZ.

Package untraceable until arrival at DHL office in Europe.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!