Add a "low priority" setting for Windoze?

[CIYAM]

Running bitcoin-qt on a not so powerful laptop running XP can be a pain as it consumes basically all CPU every time it validates a new block (so every 10 minutes or so my computer *freezes* for generally around 5 seconds which feels like a long time when you're trying to code).

Of course I know how to lower the priority of the bitcoin-qt process (and do this for now) but I think this makes for a pretty bad new user experience (especially if you are catching up blocks) and I would guess that many users may not even know how to adjust the process priority.

So maybe it would be a good idea to have a setting to "Run as low priority"?

[1714056832]

1714056832

[1714056832]

1714056832

[1714056832]

1714056832

[1714056832]

1714056832

[1714056832]

1714056832

[grue]

Code:

#ifndef WIN32
#include <Windows.h>
#endif
[...]
SetPriorityClass(GetCurrentProcess(), BELOW_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS);

[CIYAM]

Sure and I have coded SetPriorityClass before - but I was suggesting something that might be more usable for Gavin's Grandma than an API call - let's say a check box perhaps?

Hmm... just realised I posted this in the wrong sub-forum (should have been posted in Development & Technical Discussion) - any mod want to move this for me?

[dree12]

Any mod want to move this for me?

You can do so yourself.

[CIYAM]

You can do so yourself.

Oh - how?

[2112]

Oh - how?

start /b /belownormal c:\program files\bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe

from the command line; or you can make a shortcut:

c:\windows\system32\cmd.exe /c start /b /belownormal c:\program files\bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe

[CIYAM]

I *know* how to do these things (changing the priority either from a shortcut or from the Task Manager or in code, etc.).

I posted in the wrong sub-forum and I thought that I was being told I can *move* my topic so that is what I want to know "how to do".

Can someone please explain "how do I move this topic"?

(actually maybe I'll just delete it as it looks as though it will take me more time to explain what the purpose of this topic is than I think I can be bothered with)

[2112]

Can someone please explain "how do I move this topic"?

(actually maybe I'll just delete it as it looks as though it will take me more time to explain what the purpose of this topic is than I think I can be bothered with)

I'm sorry, I misunderstood your request.

The "move topic" is somewhere on the bottom of the page on the left, next to the "lock topic".

[CIYAM]

IIRC the "move thread" is somewhere on the bottom of the page on the left.

Thanks!

I had actually never noticed that link was there before (wasn't trying to be lazy).

Finally moved to where it should have been originally posted (must be a bit tired today).

[Pieter Wuille]

I'm quite sure your computer freezing up is not caused by the CPU needed for verifying signatures, but by the database I/O blocking your OS and other applications from accessing your hard disk. Scheduling the task at low priority will not help in that case.

The next release (0.8 ) should decrease I/O requirements a lot. If you're interested, feel free to try the test builds

BTW: I'm not saying that a checkbox to lower CPU priority (or even a default) is a bad idea - I just don't think it will help preventing freezes.

[CIYAM]

BTW: I'm not saying that a checkbox to lower CPU priority (or even a default) is a bad idea - I just don't think it will help preventing freezes.

When I switch the process to low priority I get *no* freezes at all so yes I *do* very much think that it is CPU.

[Diapolo]

Can you plese stop using that "Windoze" slang , thanks.

Dia

[DarkHyudrA]

Can you plese stop using that "Windoze" slang , thanks.

Dia

What a helpful post .-.

OP: Unless that in the coming years there will still exists slow laptops or even those crap netbooks, I don't believe that this is necessary.

[DeathAndTaxes]

Unless that in the coming years there will still exists slow laptops or even those crap netbooks, I don't believe that this is necessary.

Um I would say that is an absolute GUARANTEE.  Either underpowered hardware sold to meet price points accepted by the general public or otherwise decent hardware slowed to a crawl by software bloat.  Ever seen the amount of services and background processed launched by third parties in the average user's (think your mom not anonymous hacker) computer after say 3-4 years.

[CIYAM]

Can you plese stop using that "Windoze" slang , thanks.

Oh sorry - didn't mean to offend - it's just that I'm not going to put a TM every time a type a bloody standard English word just because some American company things it has the right to *own* common English words and sue people who don't do this.

So let me know what I should call it (in a way the M$ is happy for me to with but with no TM or the like)?

[Diapolo]

Can you plese stop using that "Windoze" slang , thanks.

Oh sorry - didn't mean to offend - it's just that I'm not going to put a TM every time a type a bloody standard English word just because some American company things it has the right to *own* common English words and sue people who don't do this.

So let me know what I should call it (in a way the M$ is happy for me to with but with no TM or the like)?

Just use Windows , I call Linux Linux and Mac Mac, so that should be rather straight forward ^^.

Thanks ,
Dia

[Diapolo]

I'm quite sure your computer freezing up is not caused by the CPU needed for verifying signatures, but by the database I/O blocking your OS and other applications from accessing your hard disk. Scheduling the task at low priority will not help in that case.

The next release (0.8 ) should decrease I/O requirements a lot. If you're interested, feel free to try the test builds

BTW: I'm not saying that a checkbox to lower CPU priority (or even a default) is a bad idea - I just don't think it will help preventing freezes.

After reading this thread I took a look at the same idea, to use some lower than normal priority. Perhaps I'll create a pull for this.

Dia

[CIYAM]

BTW: I'm not saying that a checkbox to lower CPU priority (or even a default) is a bad idea - I just don't think it will help preventing freezes.

As I already stated I have tested this on my laptop many times I am certain that it must be CPU and not I/O (it does not *freeze* when the task has been set to low priority).

After reading this thread I took a look at the same idea, to use some lower than normal priority. Perhaps I'll create a pull for this.

That would be great and I'll happily use that on my old and dirty windows.

[Diapolo]

You are free to take a look at my (untested and yet to be commented) pull-request.
It's perhaps just a starting point or could even be considered useless by other core devs, well see .

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2199

Dia

[Pieter Wuille]

BTW: I'm not saying that a checkbox to lower CPU priority (or even a default) is a bad idea - I just don't think it will help preventing freezes.

As I already stated I have tested this on my laptop many times I am certain that it must be CPU and not I/O (it does not *freeze* when the task has been set to low priority).

Interesting - thanks for reporting, in that case.