shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
 |
February 26, 2016, 01:29:03 PM
Last edit: February 26, 2016, 01:40:21 PM by shorena |
|
I don't know what system would be better but I agree with that the current system is not working well and it should be changed.
There are flaws to the current system, true. The question is what changes should be made to improve it. If OPs suggestion is "everyone gets a vote" Im against that change. Its just too easy to get new accounts and leave meaningless ratings which lead to inflated positive ratings. Making the system more complex to use is hardly an improvement. |
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gregyoung14
|
|
February 26, 2016, 01:35:28 PM |
|
I don't know what system would be better but I agree with that the current system is not working well and it should be changed.
There are flaws to the current system, true. The question is what changed should be made to improve it. If OPs suggestion is "everyone gets a vote" Im against that change. Its just too easy to get new accounts and leave meaningless ratings which lead to inflated positive ratings. Making the system more complex to use is hardly an improvement. Yep, plus on its own, every admin can hire any hacker to get into the system and make it work for them. And i guess you're right that if it would just complicate things, i dont think it will be of much help. |
|
|
|
|
subSTRATA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
|
|
February 26, 2016, 06:06:06 PM |
|
How about a decentralised trust system -snip- such as the one found over on thebot.net and hackforums.net
-snip-
How do these systems work in comparisson to here? Everyone's feedback counts, the system on thebot.net works perfectly but the one on hackforums has some hiccups some degree of centralization is unavoidable, complete decentralization will only lead to abuse and shilling, especially on this forum. |
theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
February 26, 2016, 07:47:14 PM
Last edit: February 27, 2016, 04:58:25 PM by Amph |
|
How about a decentralised trust system -snip- such as the one found over on thebot.net and hackforums.net
-snip-
How do these systems work in comparisson to here? he is basically saying to remove the default trust, nothing new, but his forum alone is a centralized environment, you can not have a decentralized system in a centralized environment, sound like an oxymoron to me |
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
|
February 27, 2016, 12:26:56 AM |
|
How about a decentralised trust system -snip- such as the one found over on thebot.net and hackforums.net
-snip-
How do these systems work in comparisson to here? he is basically saying to remove the default trust, nothign new, but his forum alone is a centralized environment, you can not have a decentralized system in a centralized environment, sound like an oxymoron to me Well theymos has suggested an improvement that would result in more diverse trust lists. It was voted on and not accepted though. The idea was to force users to build their own trust lists out of suggestions. I agree though the admins own the house and there will be no free state in it. |
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
greenuser
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Marie Curie, 2 x Nobel Prizes Physics & Chemistry
|
|
February 27, 2016, 01:48:04 AM |
|
I don't know what system would be better but I agree with that the current system is not working well and it should be changed.
I don't understand the current trust system. Moreover, i am shocked trust still exists in the 21st century.  |
|
|
|
whywefight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1042
www.explorerz.top
|
|
February 27, 2016, 11:39:19 AM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
|
|
|
|
|
Your Point Is Invalid (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2016, 06:54:46 PM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
Yes, the system on hf is a bit shaken but the one on tbn works nicely |
|
|
|
|
mexxer-2
|
|
February 27, 2016, 06:56:30 PM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
Yes, the system on hf is a bit shaken but the one on tbn works nicely Actually thinking about it, no one even so much as mentioned the trust system in my "a month in" TBN. Its way too dramatic here to implement that though |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Point Is Invalid (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2016, 06:58:03 PM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
Yes, the system on hf is a bit shaken but the one on tbn works nicely Actually thinking about it, no one even so much as mentioned the trust system in my "a month in" TBN. Its way too dramatic here to implement that though The system on tbn is centred around trades and actual exchanges so there are less issues over there, the system here is just open to interpretation, everything goes |
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183
dogiecoin.com
|
|
February 27, 2016, 07:56:07 PM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
Yes, the system on hf is a bit shaken but the one on tbn works nicely Actually thinking about it, no one even so much as mentioned the trust system in my "a month in" TBN. Its way too dramatic here to implement that though The system on tbn is centred around trades and actual exchanges so there are less issues over there, the system here is just open to interpretation, everything goes alt account a: "Oh hello alt account b, that was a great trade we did, have some feedback". |
|
|
|
|
Your Point Is Invalid (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2016, 08:41:50 PM |
|
Imho hf doesnt have the alt prob like we have, thats why everyone has a vote works. Also they go after sold accs.
Yes, the system on hf is a bit shaken but the one on tbn works nicely Actually thinking about it, no one even so much as mentioned the trust system in my "a month in" TBN. Its way too dramatic here to implement that though The system on tbn is centred around trades and actual exchanges so there are less issues over there, the system here is just open to interpretation, everything goes alt account a: "Oh hello alt account b, that was a great trade we did, have some feedback". People have more of an incentive to do that here if one account is in DT |
|
|
|
|
mexxer-2
|
|
February 27, 2016, 08:42:56 PM |
|
People have more of an incentive to do that here if one account is in DT
You think there aren't about 10s of alt hunters on your tail once you're on DT? I got 3 on mine at the moment, QS had a mob Edit: Also what you're talking about is more or less everyone being included in DT |
|
|
|
|
|
Your Point Is Invalid (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2016, 08:54:29 PM |
|
People have more of an incentive to do that here if one account is in DT
You think there aren't about 10s of alt hunters on your tail once you're on DT? I got 3 on mine at the moment, QS had a mob Edit: Also what you're talking about is more or less everyone being included in DT Since the system will be decentralized, there wont be DT or separate webs of trust |
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 6505
Just writing some code
|
|
February 27, 2016, 09:42:19 PM |
|
People have more of an incentive to do that here if one account is in DT
You think there aren't about 10s of alt hunters on your tail once you're on DT? I got 3 on mine at the moment, QS had a mob Edit: Also what you're talking about is more or less everyone being included in DT Since the system will be decentralized, there wont be DT or separate webs of trust What you are describing would be the same as using the current system and putting everyone on DT or putting everyone on your trustlist. So again, as people have said, what prevents me (or anyone else), from creating 500 accounts and giving you (or anyone else) a neg rating with each account? Then everyone would see those ratings and you would be considered untrusted because supposedly 500 people have negged you. What prevents someone from doing that? You say that giving trust requires trades, but how is that enforced? |
|
|
|
|
