Does Forum Allow Grouping of DT members to attack individuals ?

[Your Point Is Invalid]

It obviously does, i dont see anyone going after them
Its ridiculous that they can just leave positive trust for each other

[mexxer-2]

It obviously does, i dont see anyone going after them
Its ridiculous that they can just leave positive trust for each other

Ironical coming from a guy who has given a pos rating for nothing at all

EdenHazard 0: -0 / +0   2016-01-20   0.00000000      that username though

Anyway have you  actually read how the trust system works/is intended to work?

Also, for criss' sake, exclude at the very least remove me from your trust list.

[sase007]

Just hilarious how some guys can take a dead joke to this level.

You're pretty much grasping at straws here

I'm shocked mexxer! You left out VOD (he does quite a bit too as well as QS!

If it was a joke, why make it without explicitly sating it. Even just adding a grin or laugth emogi at the end of it!

Though I don't know the context so cannot state correctly.

It obviously does, i dont see anyone going after them
Its ridiculous that they can just leave positive trust for each other

Ironical coming from a guy who has given a pos rating for nothing at all

EdenHazard 0: -0 / +0   2016-01-20   0.00000000      that username though

Anyway have you  actually read how the trust system works/is intended to work?

Also, for criss' sake, exclude at the very least remove me from your trust list.

Excluding a person does not chane others' trust.

[mexxer-2]

I'm shocked mexxer! You left out VOD (he does quite a bit too as well as QS!

In case you haven't followed up, vod rarely replies to my PMs although yes I reported MS admin key sellers etc to him and did get a reaction.

If it was a joke, why make it without explicitly sating it. Even just adding a grin or laugth emogi at the end of it!

Humor has to be discovered my young padawan, can it not be discovered adding by an emoji. Anyway, tell me which part of this(rating to james) isn't punny 

"Mem-e-ber"(specifying his meme reactions to scam outburst) of the "HateLeague" , don't give him all the hate if he helped uncover a scam
-------

Excluding a person does not chane others' trust.

I know, but that guy for some reason(probably since the time I gave a neg for someone who asked for a loan with collateral, valued less than the loan, or something like that, for which he later apologized and said that he won't repeat this in the future bla bla bla and I removed my rating appropriately)*
has been on my tail since some time. Thinks I'm extorting members with my negs which are clearly my way of saying "Hey that guy is very suspicious IMO, he might be selling illegal stuff that might get you in trouble". And for some reason has me manually included in his trust list

[sase007]

I know, but that guy for some reason(probably since the time I gave a neg for someone who asked for a loan with collateral, valued less than the loan, or something like that, for which he later apologized and said that he won't repeat this in the future bla bla bla and I removed my rating appropriately)*
has been on my tail since some time. Thinks I'm extorting members with my negs which are clearly my way of saying "Hey that guy is very suspicious IMO, he might be selling illegal stuff that might get you in trouble". And for some reason has me manually included in his trust list

One would assume that he does not know how to remove you (adding the ~ in front of the trsust list name, I learnt that yesterday whilst fiddling)!
I know from experience that most DT members respond to trust they have given you and try as best as they can to resolve the issue. Especially the "Big Five" DT memers.

[Joel_Jantsen]

Humor has to be discovered my young padawan, can it not be discovered adding by an emoji. Anyway, tell me which part of this(rating to james) isn't punny 

[mexxer-2]

I know, but that guy for some reason(probably since the time I gave a neg for someone who asked for a loan with collateral, valued less than the loan, or something like that, for which he later apologized and said that he won't repeat this in the future bla bla bla and I removed my rating appropriately)*
has been on my tail since some time. Thinks I'm extorting members with my negs which are clearly my way of saying "Hey that guy is very suspicious IMO, he might be selling illegal stuff that might get you in trouble". And for some reason has me manually included in his trust list

One would assume that he does not know how to remove you (adding the ~ in front of the trsust list name, I learnt that yesterday whilst fiddling)!
I know from experience that most DT members respond to trust they have given you and try as best as they can to resolve the issue. Especially the "Big Five" DT memers.

Nope in fact, he has already excluded lots of members in his trust list. Also when I asked him if he knows that he can just exclude me from his trust list by adding a "~" in front of my name, he replied with "I know how to exclude you from my trust list you idiot". If confusing me was his intent, he has passed with flying colors

Also I can't see how/what you're talking about below the line is of relevance to the discussion, everyone seems intent on confusing the "Criminal mastermind"

[Your Point Is Invalid]

I'm shocked mexxer! You left out VOD (he does quite a bit too as well as QS!

In case you haven't followed up, vod rarely replies to my PMs although yes I reported MS admin key sellers etc to him and did get a reaction.

If it was a joke, why make it without explicitly sating it. Even just adding a grin or laugth emogi at the end of it!

Humor has to be discovered my young padawan, can it not be discovered adding by an emoji. Anyway, tell me which part of this(rating to james) isn't punny 

"Mem-e-ber"(specifying his meme reactions to scam outburst) of the "HateLeague" , don't give him all the hate if he helped uncover a scam
-------

Excluding a person does not chane others' trust.

I know, but that guy for some reason(probably since the time I gave a neg for someone who asked for a loan with collateral, valued less than the loan, or something like that, for which he later apologized and said that he won't repeat this in the future bla bla bla and I removed my rating appropriately)*
has been on my tail since some time. Thinks I'm extorting members with my negs which are clearly my way of saying "Hey that guy is very suspicious IMO, he might be selling illegal stuff that might get you in trouble". And for some reason has me manually included in his trust list

Actually, you gave someone a negative rating for giving someone a loan, you thought the collateral wasnt enough so you gave the lender a neg, naturally you had no choice but to remove the negative ratings days later

[mexxer-2]

Actually, you gave someone a negative rating for giving someone a loan, you thought the collateral wasnt enough so you gave the lender a neg, naturally you had no choice but to remove the negative ratings days later

It was this guy right?

Please could you remove your feedback, it was neutral but now it is red trust.

I have learnt my lesson for not asking for loans that I have no collateral to cover them for.

I am asking politely.
Be so kind as to remove it, I am pleading to you.

Edit: Anyway thats off the topic, just remove me from your trust list already

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Actually, you gave someone a negative rating for giving someone a loan, you thought the collateral wasnt enough so you gave the lender a neg, naturally you had no choice but to remove the negative ratings days later

It was this guy right?

Please could you remove your feedback, it was neutral but now it is red trust.

I have learnt my lesson for not asking for loans that I have no collateral to cover them for.

I am asking politely.
Be so kind as to remove it, I am pleading to you.

no, i dont know who that is

maybe you are mixing yourself up with luptin

[mexxer-2]

no, i dont know who that is

maybe you are mixing yourself up with luptin

So who was it? Anyway this is offtopic again, what I'm asking you is to remove me from your trust list.  Complaining about my ratings being forced is one thing but you're... well I'm speechless as to what to say

[Your Point Is Invalid]

no, i dont know who that is

maybe you are mixing yourself up with luptin

So who was it? Anyway this is offtopic again, what I'm asking you is to remove me from your trust list.  Complaining about my ratings being forced is one thing but you're... well I'm speechless as to what to say

Are you not in default trust? although you are in my trust list I am arguing from a neutral point (people that have DT2 trust list)

[Lutpin]

maybe you are mixing yourself up with luptin

Funny, cause I never left a rating to Arcteryx.
He was actually part of a campaign of mine well after recieving that negative from mexxer (whilst he still was on DT3).

[Your Point Is Invalid]

maybe you are mixing yourself up with luptin

Funny, cause I never left a rating to Arcteryx.
He was actually part of a campaign of mine well after recieving that negative from mexxer (whilst he still was on DT3).

I wasnt talking about the user, as stated before i dont know who that is, i was talking about the situation

[mexxer-2]

I wasnt talking about the user, as stated before i dont know who that is, i was talking about the situation

The rating was removed because of two reasons
1) Because he didn't repeat such an activity in the 1 month period according to my "policy" of negs
2) Because I felt pretty sorry for the guy.

I removed it also, considering the fact that "no collateral, no loan"(unless you have massive amount of trust) is loosely enforced in the community these day

Anyway, I'm not able to answer your argument until you name the individual I negged(and according to you, removed later)

[sase007]

I wasnt talking about the user, as stated before i dont know who that is, i was talking about the situation

The rating was removed because of two reasons
1) Because he didn't repeat such an activity in the 1 month period according to my "policy" of negs
2) Because I felt pretty sorry for the guy.

I removed it also, considering the fact that "no collateral, no loan"(unless you have massive amount of trust) is loosely enforced in the community these day

Anyway, I'm not able to answer your argument until you name the individual I negged(and according to you, removed later)

Please move private converstions to PM for tis is now of topic.

If this is corrct mexxer then it would seem that you may owe this user some sort of apology as it is usually up to the lender to decide the terms of their loan, NOT YOU! If it was a user account then it may have sentimental value ot the person taking out the loan and so may be worth less than the loan amount as the person will not want rid of their account or risk its sale.

[mexxer-2]

If thi si corrct mexxer then it would seem that you may owe his uer some sort of apology as it is usually up to the lender to decide te terms of their loan, NOT YOU! If it was a user account then it may have sentimental value ot the person taking out the loan and so may be worth less than the loan amount as teh person will not want rid of their account or risk its sale.

Nope : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577765.0

[Your Point Is Invalid]

I wasnt talking about the user, as stated before i dont know who that is, i was talking about the situation

The rating was removed because of two reasons
1) Because he didn't repeat such an activity in the 1 month period according to my "policy" of negs
2) Because I felt pretty sorry for the guy.

I removed it also, considering the fact that "no collateral, no loan"(unless you have massive amount of trust) is loosely enforced in the community these day

Anyway, I'm not able to answer your argument until you name the individual I negged(and according to you, removed later)

Please move private converstions to PM for tis is now of topic.

If thi si corrct mexxer then it would seem that you may owe his uer some sort of apology as it is usually up to the lender to decide te terms of their loan, NOT YOU! If it was a user account then it may have sentimental value ot the person taking out the loan and so may be worth less than the loan amount as teh person will not want rid of their account or risk its sale.

Your english is poor, also for hit so say or do anything, i first need to identify the account i mentioned, i dont have time to look into hundreds of posts now but i will to find the user by the start of the new week

also, what mexxer-2 posted above is in no way/shape/form official, it is what is recommended and collateral can take the form of things not listed

[sase007]

I wasnt talking about the user, as stated before i dont know who that is, i was talking about the situation

The rating was removed because of two reasons
1) Because he didn't repeat such an activity in the 1 month period according to my "policy" of negs
2) Because I felt pretty sorry for the guy.

I removed it also, considering the fact that "no collateral, no loan"(unless you have massive amount of trust) is loosely enforced in the community these day

Anyway, I'm not able to answer your argument until you name the individual I negged(and according to you, removed later)

Please move private converstions to PM for tis is now of topic.

If thi si corrct mexxer then it would seem that you may owe his uer some sort of apology as it is usually up to the lender to decide te terms of their loan, NOT YOU! If it was a user account then it may have sentimental value ot the person taking out the loan and so may be worth less than the loan amount as teh person will not want rid of their account or risk its sale.

Your english is poor, also for hit so say or do anything, i first need to identify the account i mentioned, i dont have time to look into hundreds of posts now but i will to find the user by the start of the new week

also, what mexxer-2 posted above is in no way/shape/form official, it is what is recommended and collateral can take the form of things not listed

Corrected the English in my revious post.
It is not the English that is the problem, it is typing quickly and allowing my computer to interpret my posts (tping quickly so my post flows better, I should really start using MSword to process my posts though)!

[mexxer-2]

also, what mexxer-2 posted above is in no way/shape/form official, it is what is recommended and collateral can take the form of things not listed

I was talking about a neg rating given because of someone asking for a loan without any collateral. Anyway I remember , offering you an explanation via PM when you asked about it. Its not gonna be different because I'm on DT