WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.

[cryptic6]

New ICO starts on Waves - JustDatingSite

https://twitter.com/JDS75738669/status/896663991103225861

[memberx]

New ICO starts on Waves - JustDatingSite

https://twitter.com/JDS75738669/status/896663991103225861

What was pre-ico bonus/price?

[tuxedo8x]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

https://i.imgur.com/ROuSE9l.png

[.cryptic.]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

Are they planning to implement 2FA on WAVES DEX? I thought 2FA has become default for any exchange which deals with crypto currencies.

[coin-investor]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

Are they planning to implement 2FA on WAVES DEX? I thought 2FA has become default for any exchange which deals with crypto currencies.

I think they should do that right away or people will question the integrity of their exchange if they fail this right away, even small exchange or site has this feature, they will not spend hundreds of dollars implementing this and they will gain investors' trust.

[Thirdspace]

Is there a separate Thread re WCT Waves Community Token? Didn't find any?

Also when will changes to Waves DEX coming up? New interface and fix the current bugs, like 1 full token trading and payment of fee in the trading currency if you don't have Waves?

Based on current functionality the first stage of asset implementation will be as follows:
WCT will be distributed in stages over a period of 9 months to all Waves holders excluding exchanges. Distribution will take place on the 15th of each month based on a snapshot of WAVES balances. 20% of all WCT assets will be distributed in the first month, with 10% distributed each subsequent month. In this way WCT will constantly add value to all active holders.

Have they found a solution or decide how to deal with duplicate token names?
I understand even their names exactly the same but they all have different unique asset IDs
but people will easily make mistake when trading tokens outside dex if only based on name
and it simply open possibilities for scam/fraud attempts

right now there are 5 WavesCommunity listed,
for newcomer with less information would unknowingly buy the wrong tokens

[turkeypotpi]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

https://i.imgur.com/ROuSE9l.png

Are they planning to implement 2FA on WAVES DEX? I thought 2FA has become default for any exchange which deals with crypto currencies.

I think they should do that right away or people will question the integrity of their exchange if they fail this right away, even small exchange or site has this feature, they will not spend hundreds of dollars implementing this and they will gain investors' trust.

i may be a noob, but I'm heavily invested, and been following. integrity should have huge priority. 2fa will bring everything up. price, security, faith. why nothing yet ? seems not too difficult. must be a reason. need firm info on dex update for price movement.

[minobia]

Just created our token with WAVES, could not be easier than this. fantastic platform

[Turing]

Is there a separate Thread re WCT Waves Community Token? Didn't find any?

Also when will changes to Waves DEX coming up? New interface and fix the current bugs, like 1 full token trading and payment of fee in the trading currency if you don't have Waves?

Based on current functionality the first stage of asset implementation will be as follows:
WCT will be distributed in stages over a period of 9 months to all Waves holders excluding exchanges. Distribution will take place on the 15th of each month based on a snapshot of WAVES balances. 20% of all WCT assets will be distributed in the first month, with 10% distributed each subsequent month. In this way WCT will constantly add value to all active holders.

Have they found a solution or decide how to deal with duplicate token names?
I understand even their names exactly the same but they all have different unique asset IDs
but people will easily make mistake when trading tokens outside dex if only based on name
and it simply open possibilities for scam/fraud attempts

right now there are 5 WavesCommunity listed,
for newcomer with less information would unknowingly buy the wrong tokens

It seems you haven't used DEX for a while.
Only validated tokennames show up.

[Turing]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

That's about the same thing for the other 900 crypto currencies, including Bitcoin.

Just make sure you don't keep your seed on your computer and don't use it for shady websites.

Don't get hacked.

[Thirdspace]

If not have 2FA, Hacker only need copy data folder of browse and try listen our password then steal asset easy, i've test and success. Waves DEX not safe

Are they planning to implement 2FA on WAVES DEX? I thought 2FA has become default for any exchange which deals with crypto currencies.

I think they should do that right away or people will question the integrity of their exchange if they fail this right away, even small exchange or site has this feature, they will not spend hundreds of dollars implementing this and they will gain investors' trust.

i may be a noob, but I'm heavily invested, and been following. integrity should have huge priority. 2fa will bring everything up. price, security, faith. why nothing yet ? seems not too difficult. must be a reason. need firm info on dex update for price movement.

in this case what good is 2FA for? if someone found out your seed, even 2FA won't be able to save you.
2FA is good for proofing you is the real you, but not for proofing something belongs to you. IMHO.

---snip---

Have they found a solution or decide how to deal with duplicate token names?
I understand even their names exactly the same but they all have different unique asset IDs
but people will easily make mistake when trading tokens outside dex if only based on name
and it simply open possibilities for scam/fraud attempts

right now there are 5 WavesCommunity listed,
for newcomer with less information would unknowingly buy the wrong tokens

It seems you haven't used DEX for a while.
Only validated tokennames show up.

I checked thru wavesgo explorer. on DEX, unverifed asset doesn't have checked mark and showed only asset ID
but I was saying how about outside dex, haven't experiencing it yet but
e.g. If I'm expecting transfer WavesCommunity from someone,
would it only show asset ID on my transaction if unverifed token?
because if I see on wavesgo explorer it shows the name and have to really check the asset ID to make sure
like I said I haven't traded yet... so I'm just asking how is it working

[antyivan]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

[CoinratZ]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

Eventually, but not anytime soon. But I agree it should cost more (holding 1500 waves haha)

[iMaster]

not really drowning in riches then huh?
So for 100 waves this would be 100 * 0.0005 = 0.05 waves per month?

[Turing]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

One-click token creation, BitcoinNG for near unlimited transactions per second, Waves DEX, Tokenomica / ICO platform, non-Turing complete script language for smart contracts, great UI / UX, etc.

Waves has everything of ETH, Lisk, Antshares (NEO) and OpenLedger combined and don't forget recent news like Gazprom Bank and NSD/Moscow Exchange...

Imagine the price...

[Lipe490]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

One-click token creation, BitcoinNG for near unlimited transactions per second, Waves DEX, Tokenomica / ICO platform, non-Turing complete script language for smart contracts, great UI / UX, etc.

Waves has everything of ETH, Lisk, Antshares (NEO) and OpenLedger combined and don't forget recent news like Gazprom Bank and NSD/Moscow Exchange...

Imagine the price...

You are right! Waves has everything to be sucsessful and hit at least $ 50 this year yet!

[memberx]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

One-click token creation, BitcoinNG for near unlimited transactions per second, Waves DEX, Tokenomica / ICO platform, non-Turing complete script language for smart contracts, great UI / UX, etc.

Waves has everything of ETH, Lisk, Antshares (NEO) and OpenLedger combined and don't forget recent news like Gazprom Bank and NSD/Moscow Exchange...

Imagine the price...

You are right! Waves has everything to be sucsessful and hit at least $ 50 this year yet!

But they should really hurry up with their DEX update, as this is the biggest issue everyone is complaining on it and it will make ICOs fail.

[Soul_eater_123]

Liquidity on the DEX is a big issue.  I would suggest creating some kind of liquidity rewards system to help tackle it.

[estenity]

waves funded accounts are now more than 61,000.

we are presently waiting for WCT landing in our lite clients on august 15 th,

september being the last occurrence of this scheduled event.

[Turing]

Waves should cost at least $50, and it will happen!

One-click token creation, BitcoinNG for near unlimited transactions per second, Waves DEX, Tokenomica / ICO platform, non-Turing complete script language for smart contracts, great UI / UX, etc.

Waves has everything of ETH, Lisk, Antshares (NEO) and OpenLedger combined and don't forget recent news like Gazprom Bank and NSD/Moscow Exchange...

Imagine the price...

You are right! Waves has everything to be sucsessful and hit at least $ 50 this year yet!

But they should really hurry up with their DEX update, as this is the biggest issue everyone is complaining on it and it will make ICOs fail.

They should bla bla bla?

DEX is beta, it is still looking very basic.
The reason for that is simple: first squash the bugs in the trades / matcher nodes based on user feedback, etc.
Then work on the frontend. And trust me, they are working on it.

But coding is like baking a cake, it's ready when it's ready... if you take it out of the oven before it's ready, well, it's not that solid...