devking
Member
 Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 15, 2017, 11:58:09 PM |
|
I think logo voting completed now. @unvoid can you please setup voting for lite wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptodv
|
|
May 16, 2017, 12:11:55 AM |
|
Hopefully it doesn't get listed on Polo first, not trusting them anymore. IMO Bittrex is more reliable, but Bittrex needs to interview the devs via Skype I've read.
|
|
|
|
devking
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
May 16, 2017, 12:47:35 AM |
|
Hopefully it doesn't get listed on Polo first, not trusting them anymore. IMO Bittrex is more reliable, but Bittrex needs to interview the devs via Skype I've read.
I hope its not true. They'll allow any coin with some btc as fee. We need to form a foundation to take care of exchanges, pr, funds, hiring new developers and website. Possible exchanges Bittrex Liqui Any Chinese exchange |
|
|
|
|
bv68bot
|
|
May 16, 2017, 12:53:40 AM |
|
I can't believe that we can't find a motivated C dev with networking experience to work on this project. How is that possible with so much talent in these forums? Did anyone put any formal ad for this somewhere?
There are motivated, experienced C developers around. The issue is how do you convince them to give some of their valuable time to Elastic? Allow them to have a stake in XEL and they will have a big incentive. For that we need to be tradable, thus we need the lite wallet soon. Or, wait for main net launch, then new dev talent can buy a stake. |
|
|
|
|
heroup
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 10
|
|
May 16, 2017, 01:06:32 AM |
|
Anyone know the plan when the net will be online?
|
██ COINDASH - ICO JULY 2017 (http://coindash.io) ██
World's first crypto portfolio management platform (http://coindash.io) |
|
|
|
valvalis
|
|
May 16, 2017, 01:10:24 AM |
|
Hopefully it doesn't get listed on Polo first, not trusting them anymore. IMO Bittrex is more reliable, but Bittrex needs to interview the devs via Skype I've read.
Polo, do not say, I'm ridiculous, and do not rely on polo |
|
|
|
|
georgeandy
|
|
May 16, 2017, 01:11:15 AM |
|
Hopefully it doesn't get listed on Polo first, not trusting them anymore. IMO Bittrex is more reliable, but Bittrex needs to interview the devs via Skype I've read.
I hope its not true. They'll allow any coin with some btc as fee. We need to form a foundation to take care of exchanges, pr, funds, hiring new developers and website. Possible exchanges Bittrex Liqui Any Chinese exchange The ideal state: Trade on Liqui ---> price * 3 trade on bittrex --> price * 5 trade on poloniex --> price * 10 you are welcome~  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jenny Moll
|
|
May 16, 2017, 01:18:50 AM |
|
I think logo voting completed now. @unvoid can you please setup voting for lite wallet?
Lite wallet to be launched, very much looking forward to a good performance. |
|
|
|
|
Bgjjj2016
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Ben2016
|
|
May 16, 2017, 01:04:29 PM |
|
Less than one hour left of voting for logo. It seems slide 0 is winning.
|
My " I want that Old Toyota Camry very bad" BTC Fund :1DQU4oqmZRcKSzg7MjPLMuHrMwnbDdjQRM |
|
|
|
|
|
unvoid
|
|
May 16, 2017, 03:04:32 PM |
|
|
BTC: 1CMgHWx4wkAaAy2FfeCyPdedUExmhGhfi5
XEL: XEL-HCM8-KB6E-YFLK-8BWMF
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
May 16, 2017, 03:33:36 PM |
|
Great to see some progress on these topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lda1000
|
|
May 16, 2017, 03:39:52 PM |
|
Excellent choice guys! I like it very much. Don't know who made it, but thanks!  |
|
|
|
|
lda1000
|
|
May 16, 2017, 03:42:49 PM |
|
Thanks unvoid. BTW, I love the way the voting is organized with elasticracy. Brilliant. |
|
|
|
|
onetwo12
|
|
May 16, 2017, 04:17:34 PM |
|
great! will vote for this! |
|
|
|
|
BTCspace
|
|
May 16, 2017, 04:35:19 PM |
|
nice i think community will make the right choice. |
running farm worldwide
|
|
|
|
tomkat
|
|
May 16, 2017, 04:43:58 PM |
|
Thanks unvoid. BTW, I love the way the voting is organized with elasticracy. Brilliant. Yeah, would be cool to have elasticracy built in the wallet (some day) |
|
|
|
|
|
unvoid
|
|
May 16, 2017, 06:11:28 PM |
|
Thanks unvoid. BTW, I love the way the voting is organized with elasticracy. Brilliant. Yeah, would be cool to have elasticracy built in the wallet (some day) Elasticracy will be outdated as soon as mainnet launch. Original stake holders will be irrelevant. If we want to some kind voting mechanism we should take a look at NXT or other coins that tried to implement voting mechanism. |
BTC: 1CMgHWx4wkAaAy2FfeCyPdedUExmhGhfi5
XEL: XEL-HCM8-KB6E-YFLK-8BWMF
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 16, 2017, 07:12:27 PM |
|
So far the vote seems to have an obv result.
|
|
|
|
|
bspus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 16, 2017, 07:49:41 PM |
|
Elasticracy will be outdated as soon as mainnet launch. Original stake holders will be irrelevant. If we want to some kind voting mechanism we should take a look at NXT or other coins that tried to implement voting mechanism.
Maybe elasticracy can be adapted to the new addresses and balances.
So far the vote seems to have an obv result.
Too early to tell. When voting for the money supply change, early results looked nothing like the final one. I noticed this when trying to vote. Warning: Bitcoin signatures expose your public keys (that shouldn't be a problem until ECDSA is broken). Moreover address reuse with a faulty random number generator may leak your private keys.
Would someone please explain to me what exactly is the risk I'm running by voting? |
|
|
|
|
