|
thepwnorbpwnd (OP)
|
 |
February 09, 2013, 01:39:11 PM |
|
What does this mean you say? I say custom drivers for bitcoin mining! Assuming 8000 series will be epic for mining, and that people will continue to interest themselves in GPU mining like me.
This is also a new turn for the electronics and PC gaming world too, want better performance in this game? Pick up the driver that this guy tuned for it, want better performance for this thing? Get that driver. Want both? Grab that one that the other guy compiled them both into.
Thoughts anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
 |
February 09, 2013, 02:54:29 PM |
|
Maybe for Alt-coins, but GPU mining for BTC will be obsolete by the time these come into play.
Ya, I'm that guy. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
thepwnorbpwnd (OP)
|
|
February 09, 2013, 03:48:35 PM |
|
Come on, you still have to see it as pretty good concept. Another company putting more power to the people!  |
|
|
|
|
coastermonger
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
Find me at Bitrated
|
|
February 09, 2013, 04:10:51 PM |
|
I'll be happy if we can convince AMD to make an ASIC chip.
|
Bitrated user: Rees.
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 09, 2013, 05:41:26 PM |
|
I'll be happy if we can convince AMD to make an ASIC chip.
Why can't the 8000 series have native sha-256 decryption without using OCL? Even if it's not "60GH/s fast", I'm sure that would be a lot faster than current products? |
|
|
|
Gabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
|
|
February 09, 2013, 09:42:30 PM |
|
Because it would be wasted transistors for 99.99% of users, wich would only slow down the card
|
|
|
|
|
Gomeler
|
|
February 09, 2013, 10:57:53 PM |
|
Because it would be wasted transistors for 99.99% of users, wich would only slow down the card
I doubt it. However, it would cost more per die and require QA time and that isn't worth it to AMD. |
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3150
Merit: 4309
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 09, 2013, 11:04:50 PM |
|
Because it would be wasted transistors for 99.99% of users, wich would only slow down the card
I doubt it. However, it would cost more per die and require QA time and that isn't worth it to AMD. I don't know, they sold a metric fuckton of 6xxx cards to us, they have to know that |
This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Deafboy
|
|
February 09, 2013, 11:09:32 PM |
|
In terms of today's Oland work, there was a simple commit to Mesa to "add support for Oland chips" inside the RadeonSI driver. This ended up being a fairly trivial commit for introducing the Oland GPU chip support, but again the RadeonSI driver is far from being feature-complete.
There was also a fairly trivial commit to the xf86-video-ati DDX for introducing Oland GPU support, which again is not really any different compared to the Southern Islands support. Likewise, a commit went into Mesa's DRM library (libdrm) too. Not so fast... |
|
|
|
|
|
thepwnorbpwnd (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2013, 12:34:55 AM |
|
Personally I think they've taken notice from 6xxx series and made gpu computing power one of the main priorities. Just look at the jump from the 6970 to the 7970 in terms of hash rate. Following on the rise I predict 800mhash from the 8970 maybe 8950
|
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 10, 2013, 12:50:28 AM |
|
Personally I think they've taken notice from 6xxx series and made gpu computing power one of the main priorities. Just look at the jump from the 6970 to the 7970 in terms of hash rate. Following on the rise I predict 800mhash from the 8970 maybe 8950
The increase in hashrate was because of the new GCN architecture of the 7xxx cards. IIRC, the 8xxx cards will also be using the same GCN. I actually don't expect to see any massive improvements in BTC mining (think 5xxx -> 6xxx improvements). |
|
|
|
ssateneth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 10, 2013, 11:03:21 AM |
|
Personally I think they've taken notice from 6xxx series and made gpu computing power one of the main priorities. Just look at the jump from the 6970 to the 7970 in terms of hash rate. Following on the rise I predict 800mhash from the 8970 maybe 8950
The increase in hashrate was because of the new GCN architecture of the 7xxx cards. IIRC, the 8xxx cards will also be using the same GCN. I actually don't expect to see any massive improvements in BTC mining (think 5xxx -> 6xxx improvements). IMO, I blame the increase from 1536 shaders to 2048 shaders |
|
|
|
|
