btclvr
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 01, 2013, 05:33:30 PM |
|
Anyone with a successful removal of fuse F1, yet?
Yes, I removed it from my Avalon and all appears to be working again. The fuse would not pop completely off the pads but enough of it has been removed to open the circuit. It was more of a cut than a removal. A better soldering station might have helped. Had you noticed any overheating of the NEC usb hub chip? There were no signs of damage from heat and the Avalon has been stable before and after the mod was performed. The component temperature was not measured. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
June 01, 2013, 06:55:50 PM |
|
Anyone with a successful removal of fuse F1, yet?
Yes, I removed it from my Avalon and all appears to be working again. The fuse would not pop completely off the pads but enough of it has been removed to open the circuit. It was more of a cut than a removal. A better soldering station might have helped. Had you noticed any overheating of the NEC usb hub chip? There were no signs of damage from heat and the Avalon has been stable before and after the mod was performed. The component temperature was not measured. Btclvr, are you, were you using wifi ? spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
drakness
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2013, 01:30:00 PM |
|
I removed wifi on my batch #2's on Thursday evening... have not cut/removed fused F1, yet. Wanted to report that the NEC usb hub chip is room temperature, to the touch (during hashing).
Leaving it alone, for now. Anyone else besides btclvr try the mod?
|
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
June 02, 2013, 04:38:32 PM |
|
I removed wifi on my batch #2's on Thursday evening... have not cut/removed fused F1, yet. Wanted to report that the NEC usb hub chip is room temperature, to the touch (during hashing).
Leaving it alone, for now. Anyone else besides btclvr try the mod?
Drakness, There are two options on the GUI: disable wifi and remove wifi, which one did you choose? I've disabled it friday evening and since then my units have been hashing without problems. In a couple of days I'll stop one and open it to see if chips on the control board show signs of overheating. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
WinTame2012
|
|
June 02, 2013, 04:45:36 PM |
|
I removed wifi on my batch #2's on Thursday evening... have not cut/removed fused F1, yet. Wanted to report that the NEC usb hub chip is room temperature, to the touch (during hashing).
Leaving it alone, for now. Anyone else besides btclvr try the mod?
Batch#2 was shipped w/o antenna... I've catched a thought last night that chip overheating could take a place when TP-LINK have enabled Wi-Fi module but missing antenna. If TP-LINK implements dynamic power calibration for Wi-Fi PHY lacking of antenna could force it drawing much more power hence USB-hub chip overheating. This is just my deduction though. |
|
|
|
ProfMac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 02, 2013, 05:25:00 PM |
|
Just as a cursory reader of this thread it might help if someone posted a picture of the before and after job of what the fuse looks like when it is cut. Or at least a photo with a very clear arrow pointing to whichever fuse is the culprit.
Is this "fuse" thing specific to Batch 2 units? I've never seen anyone discussing it before Batch 2 started shipping, now it's suddenly a big deal... It's specific to the v1.5 control module. From what I understand they've already fixed all new batch 2 units shipping out. So if you receive a unit on or after May 29-June 1 it probably already has the fuse removed. This is evidence that the team is tuning the design. I myself am glad to know this. |
I try to be respectful and informed.
|
|
|
drakness
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2013, 06:30:54 PM |
|
WinTame2012: Interesting idea about the wifi power draw being affected by the antenna. I had installed 9dB antenna's on mine, which have now been decommissioned, of course. Above, senseless says that he was not using wifi when the chip was burned, but it was still enabled. No doubt he wasn't using an antenna, if he wasn't using wifi. And that is the scenario during which his chip was burned.
spiccioli: I think that under the 'interface' tab, where the LAN and WWAN devices are listed, it allows for disabling, if I remember correctly. Under the wifi tab it offers an option to remove the instance that is setup, below the scan button. I removed this instance and the WWAN listing on the 'interface' tab had then disappeared. I am assuming the kernel doesn't load the wifi software/driver, if there is no listing there, but I don't know enough to check this.
ProfMac: Yes, this is good news. I do note that the decision to make this change had already been made by the time senseless was in the Avalon irc chat with xiangfu when he learned of the news of this. I was there with senseless and abracadabra when he was being shown the pics of the burned chip and hearing senseless's news. ngzhang had communicated to him already that F1 fuse removal was a good idea... and that the remaining batch2/3 unites were being made with the revision.
drakness
|
|
|
|
|
|
WinTame2012
|
|
June 02, 2013, 07:02:14 PM |
|
WinTame2012: Interesting idea about the wifi power draw being affected by the antenna. I had installed 9dB antenna's on mine, which have now been decommissioned, of course. Above, senseless says that he was not using wifi when the chip was burned, but it was still enabled. No doubt he wasn't using an antenna, if he wasn't using wifi. And that is the scenario during which his chip was burned.
Yes, I think the Wi-Fi interface is working in the bridge mode in Avalon so it can still be powered while is 'not used'. And without antenna attached PHY layer have to ramp up its power to have more/less stable signal while just listening around. Xiangfu said that this happens not on all TP-LINK units so probably there is HW bug in some SoC revisions which is related to power management as well. If anybody with fried USB hub chip care to share his antenna condition (attached or not) this would clear this guess up a lot. |
|
|
|
Uncle Scrooge
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
June 03, 2013, 03:39:26 AM |
|
Does anyone know how to rest the password on the Avalon unit? Each time I try to log in it says wrong password.
|
|
|
|
|
btclvr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2013, 04:31:58 AM |
|
Anyone with a successful removal of fuse F1, yet?
Yes, I removed it from my Avalon and all appears to be working again. The fuse would not pop completely off the pads but enough of it has been removed to open the circuit. It was more of a cut than a removal. A better soldering station might have helped. Had you noticed any overheating of the NEC usb hub chip? There were no signs of damage from heat and the Avalon has been stable before and after the mod was performed. The component temperature was not measured. Btclvr, are you, were you using wifi ? spiccioli Yes, wifi was and still is enabled and working. |
|
|
|
|
ProfMac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 03, 2013, 06:04:44 AM |
|
Does anyone know how to rest the password on the Avalon unit? Each time I try to log in it says wrong password.
Google for openWRT and Failsafe. |
I try to be respectful and informed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
server
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
|
|
June 03, 2013, 10:16:54 AM |
|
suxx  |
|
|
|
|
gyverlb
|
|
June 03, 2013, 12:04:30 PM |
|
The last one anti76 is a "special case" IIRC: he managed to get in batch1 by harassing Avalon with an order he didn't pay in time and I wouldn't be surprised (and wouldn't blame Avalon) if he would be the very last customer serviced at the end of batch3 (would probably make him wait less than an early customer of BFL ASICs has/will have)... There are 6 others in the OP, which makes it 2+% of the 300 units to be delivered (assuming at least one missing Avalon per order and that these customers didn't forget to come back in the thread after receiving their units). It's not really high for international shipping of something that customs can't make heads of tails (there were customer reports having been contacted by customs to explain what the package was and confirm how much it cost). What's missing from the OP is the number of units, the problem isn't the same if we are talking of 10 units/order instead of 1. I'm waiting for one Avalon myself and would really like to know that. Fortunately I seem to have a low-risk profile: I've used an account instead of doing an anonymous purchase (which seemed to make things easier for batch1), live in a country with not much corruption (at least from average people like the ones working in customs) and they had all my delivery information including my mobile phone number from the start (there were problems with missing delivery information and returned packages according to Avalon IIRC). Investing in ASICs is clearly high risk (from various reasons), don't put all your coins in the same basket if you can... |
|
|
|
goxed
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006
Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
|
June 05, 2013, 07:03:34 AM |
|
|
Revewing Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
|
|
|
|
darkip
|
|
June 07, 2013, 09:51:59 AM |
|
I removed the F1 fuses on my two Avalons this morning - It's surprisingly easy (DISCLAIMER - I'm not responsible for any issues), I just pinched off the fuses with my leatherman pliers.
All back up and running perfectly.
For anyone interested, after running for a week with the fuses, there was no noticeable damage to the chips on the control boards. However, it's still recommended to remove the fuses.
|
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
June 07, 2013, 11:02:41 AM
Last edit: June 07, 2013, 11:38:19 AM by spiccioli |
|
For anyone interested, after running for a week with the fuses, there was no noticeable damage to the chips on the control boards. However, it's still recommended to remove the fuses.
I've opened one of my two units the other day, batch 2, received may 31st and mining since then with wifi disabled, no signs of overheating and units stable and hashing well. I've taken a couple of photos, just to be able to compare chip state later. Flat cables from control unit to blades can block airflow though, so I bended them a little to leave a passage for the air. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
pikeadz
|
|
June 10, 2013, 12:30:11 PM |
|
I can't seem to find the thread now, but recently someone posted a question regarding how many Avalons it is safe to plug into a typical outlet (I believe someone said two would be the max).
I would like to set all this up in my house. Here, we have 120 volt lines and 15 amp breakers. This is the hardware I will have:
-three 3-module Avalons
-two 4-module Avalons
-two block erupter blades
-GPU farm (6 7950s) may also be running for a short while until they are not profitable.
I may end up distributing the load so I have each Avalon on a separate circuit, but even with that setup I want to make sure I am not approaching capacity of my panel.
Is all of this possible on a residential setup or do I need to look into leasing some space?
|
|
|
|
|
SolarSilver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 10, 2013, 12:49:42 PM |
|
I would like to set all this up in my house. Here, we have 120 volt lines and 15 amp breakers.
so on circuit you can have 120 x 15= 1800 Watts maximum (not taking in account Cos phi effects and such) Buy a kill-a-watt and mesure the exact consumption of your individual machines in action. Slap on some extra safety margin For example, with this weather, my Batch #1 Avalon @ 300 MHz are consuming 655 Watts So three machines would be > 1800 (and I would not try to load it to 99%) I may end up distributing the load so I have each Avalon on a separate circuit, but even with that setup I want to make sure I am not approaching capacity of my panel.
I think you should also look at how practical it is to get rid of the excess heat, wherever you decide the put your machines Is all of this possible on a residential setup or do I need to look into leasing some space?
If you have enough circuits and enough room to vent, and you neighbours don't complain about the fan noise... yes it should be no problem |
|
|
|
|
|
