Is science a religion?

[ichsan ardi]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

[1713465489]

1713465489

[1713465489]

1713465489

[1713465489]

1713465489

[1713465489]

1713465489

[ichsan ardi]

I have read a couple of the responses and I would like to give my 2 cents on the matter.

I think science is creeping into the role of a religion more and more. One hears the engineers at GoogleTalks talk about AI and uploading their mind to a computer. If you really think about that as their answer to the age old questions of life, then yes, science is a religion since it more and more tries to solve these oldest of questions. They want to avoid death, want to explore the universe and prevent age degradation and biological limitations. These are exactly the same things religion has been trying to give to people for thousands of years. The main difference in my opinion, is that science might give it to them while they are still alive in a technical sense.

science is a part off the religion. in religion there are still many things that are incompatible with knowledge, but that doesnt prove that science is a religion. everything in the religion that we've not yet known is caused by our intellect not been able to digest everything that is in religion. our brains still need time to grow and understand everything that seems illogical in religion.

[Xember]

Definitely not. In the world of Science, everything must have a proof in order for it to be scientifically proven. Everything has orgins and theory. Therefore, making it only as a subject or a form of study. Religion is the generalization of belief and faith, so Science cannot be a form of faith.

[mirror001]

All things considered, science is not a religion and it does not simply come down to confidence. Despite the fact that it has a large number of religion's ideals, it has none of its indecencies. Science depends on evident confirmation. Religious confidence not just needs confirms, its autonomy from proving is its pride and happiness, yelled from the housetops.

With the exception of a certain something. The meaning of "science." Inside the meaning of science as it is characterized among researchers, is science hypothesis. Science hypothesis may appear to be true, it may have loads of confirmation, yet it is not reality essentially. At the point when science hypothesis are proclaimed and accepted to be actualized, when it is realized that it would not be a certainty, it progresses toward becoming a religion. Also, in that way science is religion.

[trickee]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

well,science is not a religion and it doesnt just come down to faith.although it has many religion's virtues it has none of its  vices.Science is based upon verifiable evidence.Religious faith not only lacks evidence,its independence  from evidence is it pride and joy,shouted from the rooftops.

[popcorn1]

It could be i suppose because if your doing science every day your religiously doing it ..

I religiously watch the TV ..

But what ever in science you need to prove it to be FACT .
How long as people been trying to prove gods a fact?..

I give up when i was about 10 years old about 3 years after i found out father Christmas was not real ..

[jdeanne92]

Well, science is not religion and it doesn’t just come down to faith. Although it has many of religion’s virtues, it has none of its vices. Science is based upon verifiable evidence. Religious faith not only lacks evidence, its independence from evidence is its pride and joy, shouted from the rooftops.

[spongegar]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

Religion could be interpreted as a way to believe and worship a God or a  set of Gods. But it could be interpreted as a belief that is very important to a person. So yes you could definitely say that science is a religion. But you wouldn't actually write it down to your forms. I also see replies that yes it is an opposite of religion where science deals with facts where as religion deals with faith. But both are based on something and the person believing it has the end perspective

[Brunus]

Of course science is a religion. Only, it has a different set of believes.
Ah, just a little detail: science can demonstrate this believes....

[WhoKn0ws]

Science is an objective, systematic study of the universe while religion is more about moral, spiritual issues of human beings and their existence..

[deniskiely]

I think science isn't a religion because things in science was already improved. Things in religion are usually hard to explain.

[DRVX]

Absolutely not. Science is the knowledge and religion is a faith, moreover - often blind faith.

[charmaine08]

I think it is a subject that teachers teach to their students 😂😂😂😂😂

[roshanfious]

science is a combination of all things human have been proved to explain things human is still not know, it just a way of finding answer, it is not a religion.

[BADecker]

One hundred percent of the stuff that makes up evolution theory can be applied to and explained by things other than evolution. In addition, there are several major things that show that evolution is impossible. Yet evolutionists twist words and explanations all out of shape to try to prove that evolution is real. What they do is prove that evolution science is a religion. And there are many other science theories that people believe without knowing that the objects/subjects of the theories are fact or not.

If you look at all the religions of the world, there are some parts of each of them that are factual. Even if the only fact is that people worship in a certain place, it still is a fact. In the same way, there are facts of science that are not theory. Some science experiments produce real and substantial, proven results.

This means that science and religion are the same at their fundamental cores. Science is religion, and religion is a science.

[voltesbit777]

Well, science is not religion and it doesn't just come down to faith. Although it has many of religion's virtues, it has none of its vices. Science is based upon verifiable evidence. Religious faith not only lacks evidence, its independence from evidence is its pride and joy, shouted from the rooftops.

Agreed, Religion is base on the history about in the bible if you believed in the bible. While science is more on gaining and discovering knowledge whether it is a living things, things, and others.

[SugoiSenpai]

Science can't be a religion, it is a subject where you find knowledge about how everything around us works. You can believe in science while also believing in God like the big bang theory which can be caused by God himself. Science revolves around on what data you have gathered to serve as a proof to prove that something is real or fake whilst in religion it is more on morals, faith, and believing on a certain thing that doesn't even have proof of existence.

[iconicavs]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

Do you smoke your weed before or after reading from your holy book?

From the nonsense you posted, I conclude you are a Muslim.

Eternal masterpiece?  Shoot, the weed you are smoking is gooood.

Our universe the most hostile environment to life that you could imagine. 

Shots fired! Savage! But I don't like the Muslim part though. It's kind of crossing the line. He must be but still, the discrimination is quite sensitive. B

[iconicavs]

I think science isn't a religion because things in science was already improved. Things in religion are usually hard to explain.

You have a point but we have this thing called theory. It's not proven and it exists in Science. Religion isn't hard to explain as well. Read and read and reflect.

[Hans17]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

.potentially yes .. religion is defined by faith and beliefs one has to strengthen his bond with the higher form or being in the case of science its much likely an anti religion base for its facts and proofs explaining the unexplained bound to religion itself