Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[gross]

Hello, i get a bug

no new job were received for 5 mins - something wrong with the pool, disconnect

only shares found and  accept, GPU temp and % fan but NO new job (...) from pool, NO total speed, NO total share, No GPU hashrate like another rigs

[citronick]

Hello, i get a bug

no new job were received for 5 mins - something wrong with the pool, disconnect

only shares found and  accept, GPU temp and % fan but NO new job (...) from pool, NO total speed, NO total share, No GPU hashrate like another rigs

which ETH pool are you mining from?

[citronick]

I was trying to switch to ethermine.org but having issues with my command line ... can someone let me know if this is correct?

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -esm 1 -ewal <myetheraddress> -epsw x

Thanks in advance.

try adding a worker name along with your ETH address.

<eth address>.<workername>

[zorvalth]

@Claymore instead of pushing config is it possible to edit config through the remote app? This will be way easier to change settings when there are many rigs. Also it will be helpful if we can execute reboot.bat throughthe remote manager.

[merc84]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

[citronick]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

actually Nanos are a good buy in the long run, because it has higher resale value avoiding being stuck with legacy cards that suck in too much power, and also fantastic undervolting capabilities. With special ROM mod, 6 x Nanos can deliver 185MH/s with only 4.8amp @ 1050w! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424132.msg14404213#msg14404213

[frostminer]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

actually Nanos are a good buy in the long run, because it has higher resale value avoiding being stuck with legacy cards that suck in too much power, and also fantastic undervolting capabilities. With special ROM mod, 6 x Nanos can deliver 185MH/s with only 4.8amp @ 1050w! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424132.msg14404213#msg14404213

Nanos looks like great cards.. but so costly.

What prices do you get on:

R9 Nano (48mh)
R9 390    (31mh)
R9 380ITX (22mh)


Would be interesting to see calcs on $/mh

[merc84]

Afaik r9 380 (non x) is best $/mh especially the 2GB models, however the point about Nano resale value is very relevant especially with 14nm just around the corner. Still 18 Nano's are insanely expensive 

[Alehandros]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

actually Nanos are a good buy in the long run, because it has higher resale value avoiding being stuck with legacy cards that suck in too much power, and also fantastic undervolting capabilities. With special ROM mod, 6 x Nanos can deliver 185MH/s with only 4.8amp @ 1050w! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424132.msg14404213#msg14404213

I'm not sure those kind of power savings are capable using Claymore's dual mode, owing to the extra load on the cards?

[pehoko]

Is this miner working on coinotron?

[el_rlee]

Afaik r9 380 (non x) is best $/mh especially the 2GB models, however the point about Nano resale value is very relevant especially with 14nm just around the corner. Still 18 Nano's are insanely expensive 

Are the 2GB a limitation in any way on the claymore miner, as it isn't using a DAG anyways?

[markoz]

few questions/suggestions

1. Is it possible for remote manager to access from outside ip. Its working fine in my private network but i want to access it from outside to chek on rigs, like in my browser when i type 127.0.0.1:8000 is it possible to be myoutside(publicstatic)ip:8000 to get the same result? found solution

2. It would be great to add option for remote manager to send alert email when miner stops or hangs or when -tstop is reached, like now when it says warning in titlebar when something is wrong option to send email or any other kind of alert so we dont have to check every few minutes for status.

3.it would be good to have option to save manager config, if we change manager to another computer to avoid typing again. i see now, when you exit manager a new file is created which is basicly config for manager

[zyzzyva]

Afaik r9 380 (non x) is best $/mh especially the 2GB models, however the point about Nano resale value is very relevant especially with 14nm just around the corner. Still 18 Nano's are insanely expensive 

Are the 2GB a limitation in any way on the claymore miner, as it isn't using a DAG anyways?

Claymore's miner still uses a DAG. It just creates it directly on the GPU, instead of creating it on disk and then uploading it from disk to the GPU. So yes, the 2GB limitation still applies (though it sounds from posts here like 2GB cards are still working for the time being).

[frostminer]

Afaik r9 380 (non x) is best $/mh especially the 2GB models, however the point about Nano resale value is very relevant especially with 14nm just around the corner. Still 18 Nano's are insanely expensive 

Are the 2GB a limitation in any way on the claymore miner, as it isn't using a DAG anyways?

Claymore's miner still uses a DAG. It just creates it directly on the GPU, instead of creating it on disk and then uploading it from disk to the GPU. So yes, the 2GB limitation still applies (though it sounds from posts here like 2GB cards are still working for the time being).

Seems like the DAG is around 1,45GB. Thats what my cards use of memory.

[citronick]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

actually Nanos are a good buy in the long run, because it has higher resale value avoiding being stuck with legacy cards that suck in too much power, and also fantastic undervolting capabilities. With special ROM mod, 6 x Nanos can deliver 185MH/s with only 4.8amp @ 1050w! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424132.msg14404213#msg14404213

Nanos looks like great cards.. but so costly.

What prices do you get on:

R9 Nano (48mh)
R9 390    (31mh)
R9 380ITX (22mh)


Would be interesting to see calcs on $/mh

R9-Nano can do 48MHs??? How do you get 48MHs per GPU?

My 390s with slight undervolting and overclocking can do max 29.9MHs per GPU with CDM 4.4 (with dual mining ethi 16 and no dcri settings)... impressive actually this CDM being able to push the 390.

[Alehandros]

anybody tried R9-Nanos on ETH and DCR?
whats the best you could squeeze out of them for performance?
Need to know the baseline best settings at stock, before I apply some mod....  

Have 3x 6 card R9 nano rigs, v15 drivers *seem* to be best, you should get 150 mh/s without much trouble.

Am interested to see what you can squeeze out of these babys!

edit: ETH 150 mh/s + DCR 2.5 gh/s per rig

You sir have too much money, who can afford that many nanos for a mining rig.

actually Nanos are a good buy in the long run, because it has higher resale value avoiding being stuck with legacy cards that suck in too much power, and also fantastic undervolting capabilities. With special ROM mod, 6 x Nanos can deliver 185MH/s with only 4.8amp @ 1050w! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424132.msg14404213#msg14404213

Nanos looks like great cards.. but so costly.

What prices do you get on:

R9 Nano (48mh)
R9 390    (31mh)
R9 380ITX (22mh)


Would be interesting to see calcs on $/mh

R9-Nano can do 48MHs??? How do you get 48MHs per GPU?

My 390s with slight undervolting and overclocking can do max 29.9MHs per GPU with CDM 4.4 (with dual mining ethi 16 and no dcri settings)... impressive actually this CDM being able to push the 390.

me too! I'd love to know if 48MHs per GPU is possible!

[Balbec]

Just read carefully. 2 Sapphire Nanos - means 24 MH/s per card)

[citronick]

Just read carefully. 2 Sapphire Nanos - means 24 MH/s per card)

ok got it.

you should be able to get them to about 26-27MHs with slight undervolting and overclocking; more MHs with the Nano ROM mod.
5 x Nano = up to 128Mhs, and slightly under 1000watts total; even more watts savings with the Nano ROM mod.
I guess for multi GPU farms, the savings from electricity alone will be worth the $499 per GPU.

[sapientidiot]

When i try to run on my ArchLinux system i get an error:

Code:

./ethdcrminer64: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4: version `CURL_OPENSSL_3' not found (required by ./ethdcrminer64)

Is there any way to fix this? I do have libcurl installed already, and i tried an older version as well. Do i need a very specific version of libcurl?

[osnwt]

When i try to run on my ArchLinux system i get an error:

Code:

./ethdcrminer64: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4: version `CURL_OPENSSL_3' not found (required by ./ethdcrminer64)

Is there any way to fix this? I do have libcurl installed already, and i tried an older version as well. Do i need a very specific version of libcurl?

https://github.com/Vector35/binaryninja-api/issues/155
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcurl-compat/

Maybe this?