Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[Claymore]

my 390s rig does not show in suprnova for a while now..only DCR hashes in the miner are there... no "DCR share found" or DCR share accepted"

while the 280x rig is okay.

PM me zipped log file please.

[1713539266]

1713539266

[1713539266]

1713539266

[DuvajBalone]

@Claymore, Is it suppose to be better on R9 380 (tonga) cards?

48 hours of testing on equal rigs and the original miner and yours are making pretty much the same result.

Right not after 10 hours of the new version vs original qtminer:

Ballance: 0.4717089107482806 vs 0.4826856692655387

miners changed lead several time but the biggest lead was around 0.01 Ether

-cclock and -mclock are not working for me too.

So there is no point of using this miner in ETH only mode, also power consumption is a little higher.

But I noticed that rigs with 270x did not stop mining when DAG changed , with other miners it always stop and I have to manually restart miner. It could be a big plus if it works. I will see if it stops on next DAG change.

[alevlaslo]

Thanks for new relize, only 2-3% rejects now on this port!

http://dcr.coinmine.pl:2999

[arielbit]

my 390s rig does not show in suprnova for a while now..only DCR hashes in the miner are there... no "DCR share found" or DCR share accepted"

while the 280x rig is okay.

PM me zipped log file please.

will mine for about 30mins again in dual..and send you the a fresh log..(because i switched to ETH only, got lost in a lot of log files)


off topic:

you might want to take a peek at equihash POW

you can't be late for this  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1438066.new#new

[olajos]

Hello Claymore. i Have one rig with 2x380 and 1x290x
the 2 380 gives me different speed. why?
gpu0 380(20mh)
gpu1 380(18.9mh)
gpu2 290x (28.5mh)
the 2 cards are totally identical.
no matter that i am running on ether mode only or dual mining, with every version of your miner tried.

[Xdragon]

Has anyone managed to mine on coinmine.pl with qtminer mode? Here is my .bat file

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth.coinmine.pl:4001 -ewal Login -eworker Login.worker -epsw 1 -mode 1 -esm 1 -allpools 1

I also tried different combinations with -ewal and -eworker, but no avail.

[alevlaslo]

stratum+tcp://dcr.pool.mn:4800

only 1% rejects!

[qqqq]

After 12 hours on suprnova (2.0-2.2 %) Rej.

[alevlaslo]

10 minutes on supernova stratum: 150 good shares, 100 bad

[zorvalth]

Hello Claymore. i Have one rig with 2x380 and 1x290x
the 2 380 gives me different speed. why?
gpu0 380(20mh)
gpu1 380(18.9mh)
gpu2 290x (28.5mh)
the 2 cards are totally identical.
no matter that i am running on ether mode only or dual mining, with every version of your miner tried.

Minimize the miner and leave the desktop for a few minutes in idle, if you are using TeamViewer disconnect for a few minutes. Then check it again, they will be equal. Its not from his miner but because the others dont show separate hash for every card you dont notice it. One of the cards is being used to show the desktop.

[olajos]

Hello Claymore. i Have one rig with 2x380 and 1x290x
the 2 380 gives me different speed. why?
gpu0 380(20mh)
gpu1 380(18.9mh)
gpu2 290x (28.5mh)
the 2 cards are totally identical.
no matter that i am running on ether mode only or dual mining, with every version of your miner tried.

Minimize the miner and leave the desktop for a few minutes in idle, if you are using TeamViewer disconnect for a few minutes. Then check it again, they will be equal. Its not from his miner but because the others dont show separate hash for every card you dont notice it. One of the cards is being used to show the desktop.

ETH: GPU0 19.954 Mh/s, GPU1 18.990 Mh/s, GPU2 28.451 Mh/s

always get this. not matter the team viewer or anything.... i can send the log.

[AlexBoos]

10 minutes on supernova stratum: 150 good shares, 100 bad

With pool Supernova has long been clear. There Ether and very poorly produced.  

[knobson]

!!! WARNING !!! You seem to be sending a large amount of INVALID shares ! Check your rigs, you might be mining the wrong algo and your hashrate could be displayed wrong! !!! WARNING !!!

[madmartyk]

!!! WARNING !!! You seem to be sending a large amount of INVALID shares ! Check your rigs, you might be mining the wrong algo and your hashrate could be displayed wrong! !!! WARNING !!!

Maybe it's something you did, I have been using the 2.0 for 12 hours now and everything is right where it should be.

[alevlaslo]

With pool Supernova has long been clear. There Ether and very poorly produced.  

on DCR

[zorvalth]

Hello Claymore. i Have one rig with 2x380 and 1x290x
the 2 380 gives me different speed. why?
gpu0 380(20mh)
gpu1 380(18.9mh)
gpu2 290x (28.5mh)
the 2 cards are totally identical.
no matter that i am running on ether mode only or dual mining, with every version of your miner tried.

Minimize the miner and leave the desktop for a few minutes in idle, if you are using TeamViewer disconnect for a few minutes. Then check it again, they will be equal. Its not from his miner but because the others dont show separate hash for every card you dont notice it. One of the cards is being used to show the desktop.

ETH: GPU0 19.954 Mh/s, GPU1 18.990 Mh/s, GPU2 28.451 Mh/s

always get this. not matter the team viewer or anything.... i can send the log.

Are you sure they are exact make and model, same clock? Maybe the faster is samsung memory and the slower is elpida? 

[olajos]

Hello Claymore. i Have one rig with 2x380 and 1x290x
the 2 380 gives me different speed. why?
gpu0 380(20mh)
gpu1 380(18.9mh)
gpu2 290x (28.5mh)
the 2 cards are totally identical.
no matter that i am running on ether mode only or dual mining, with every version of your miner tried.

Minimize the miner and leave the desktop for a few minutes in idle, if you are using TeamViewer disconnect for a few minutes. Then check it again, they will be equal. Its not from his miner but because the others dont show separate hash for every card you dont notice it. One of the cards is being used to show the desktop.

ETH: GPU0 19.954 Mh/s, GPU1 18.990 Mh/s, GPU2 28.451 Mh/s

always get this. not matter the team viewer or anything.... i can send the log.

Are you sure they are exact make and model, same clock? Maybe the faster is samsung memory and the slower is elpida?  

thanks dude
i found it. on one card there is elpida on the other card is hynix memory....
sorry for my ignorance....

[cryptoc19]

Does anyone have shares displayed correctly on ethermine.org ?  I mean in the "Shares (Invalid / Valid / %)" column..
Claymore's miner does submit ( and only valids! ) and I am obviously getting paid for them, but they're not displayed like I said (tried both with v1.2 and with v2.0).

[MacT]

@Claymore, Is it suppose to be better on R9 380 (tonga) cards?

48 hours of testing on equal rigs and the original miner and yours are making pretty much the same result.

Right not after 10 hours of the new version vs original qtminer:

Ballance: 0.4717089107482806 vs 0.4826856692655387

miners changed lead several time but the biggest lead was around 0.01 Ether

So there is no point of using this miner in ETH only mode, also power consumption is a little higher.

 Most people are getting good gains with this miner with and without decred, a few are not. A new enhanced
qtminer seems to have come out today claiming 3-5% more hashrate, but only in ubuntu,

[citronick]

Does anyone have shares displayed correctly on ethermine.org ?  I mean in the "Shares (Invalid / Valid / %)" column..
Claymore's miner does submit ( and only valids! ) and I am obviously getting paid for them, but they're not displayed like I said (tried both with v1.2 and with v2.0).

yes, i have same issue.

I am still paid but the dashboard (bottom page with graphs) doesn't report any hash and funny thing is the summary on top of the ethermine.org, it correctly sum up total mhs for all my rigs. I suspect its the way etherminer is coded but then again qtminer.exe works too, but not the dual miner.