Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[NomadGroup]

Hey guy I have 4 rigs running on etherpool and today 3 of them one by one just stopped reporting their hashrate but all 4 still work, it's just that 3 out of 4 do not report.  Can someone please explain what seems to be the problem?  Thanks!

And I did restart the miner on one of them but it didn't help. 

I noticed this as well, thought my miners were down but shares seem to be the same

All back to normal now. 

[1714021327]

1714021327

[Claymore]

I left a comment on BBT video saying Claymore said don't believe those youtube guys, GSMiner has the same hashdrop problems with new epochs

hi replied

Bits Be Trippin'
 9 hours ago
SGMiner (Linux) using OpenCL 2.0 does not have the same issue after EPOCH 150+

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg19799485#msg19799485

[sweetydady]

I left a comment on BBT video saying Claymore said don't believe those youtube guys, GSMiner has the same hashdrop problems with new epochs

hi replied

Bits Be Trippin'
 9 hours ago
SGMiner (Linux) using OpenCL 2.0 does not have the same issue after EPOCH 150+

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg19799485#msg19799485

yeah. asked him the same question after, still waiting for reply

[trung3491]

ethminer.exe -U -S eu2.ethermine.org:4444 -SP 1 -O 0xa30ec91808321f158022956f742e62157f4ad0dd.glavni

you can try also --cl-local-work 128 --cl-global-work 8192

I have no %10 speedup with gtx1060, I have %2.5. I use gtx1060 9gbps edition, unfortunately all of them have performance problem for gtx1060 9gbps edition

try this!

@echo off
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ethminer.exe --farm-recheck 2000 -U -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -FS us1.ethermine.org:4444 -O yourwallet.name


it work wonderful with mine 6x 1060 3gb giving 130mh(claymore) to 145/150mh (ethminer!!)


if you want to mine with amd just put -G to -U

I'm using this tool and it works. But my PC automatically restarts after running about 20 -30 mins. Does anyone have an issue with this problem ?

[lautre]

hello.
amd rx 480 4gb samsung memory 2150mgz core at 1080 :
Claymore (dual mining) on windows - ethmine pool : reported hashrate 26.7 : average effective : 22.3
Claymore (dual mining) on linux - ethmine pool : reported hashrate 26.7 : average effective : 26+

i have tested it for multiple days, driver problem? i can see on the console the hashrate something jump from 26.5+mh to 23mh.
Hashrate unstable under windows?

[Bulletdodger]

Hey guys, friends of mine have error 999 and miner quits, any ideas?
They tried some solutions we found online, but nothing works.

[fredeq]

Can anyone confirm that DAG slowdown will also affect 5xx series?

[Vann]

Can anyone confirm that DAG slowdown will also affect 5xx series?

As it it right now, the Claymore miner epoch benchmarks show a rather significant ~10% drop after epoch 150 for the Polaris cards and progressively increasing after that. There are conflicting reports as to whether the issue is with the Claymore miner and if other miners, like SGminer are affected. Apparently AMD is also aware of the issue and are talking with Claymore about it.

[sofianeelec]

hello,

when I switch to Claymore's v9.6 I get probleme on the pool thet can not dispaly somme effective Hashrate of rigs, but this rigs keep mining and activated normaly, only effective Hashrate graphe can not dispalyed

[sofianeelec]

hello,

when I switch to Claymore's v9.6 I get probleme on the pool thet can not dispaly somme effective Hashrate of rigs, but this rigs keep mining and activated normaly, only effective Hashrate graphe can not dispalyed

[fuliaro]

This seems terribly poor for dual RX480 cards (VisionTek RX 480 8 GB OC + XFX RX 480 8 GB OC):

ETH - Total Speed: 29.125 Mh/s, Total Shares: 15, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:26
ETH: GPU0 16.488 Mh/s, GPU1 12.636 Mh/s
 SC - Total Speed: 873.735 Mh/s, Total Shares: 14, Rejected: 0
 SC: GPU0 494.650 Mh/s, GPU1 379.085 Mh/s
GPU0 t=86C fan=41%, GPU1 t=80C fan=36%

I'm using

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-us-west1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal myaddr.rig1/myemail -epsw x -dcoin sia -dpool sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal myaddr/rig1/myemail -dpsw x -ftime 10

When I mine ETH only I get 48 MH/s. I have disabled crossfire in Radeon settings with the expectation that the different brands of cards would have issues with crossfire.

Am I doing something wrong? Should I be getting better than that?

Set -dcri to 20 or less and try it again.
You can also use "+" or "-" to change.

[]s

[AlainC]

when I switch to Claymore's v9.6 I get probleme on the pool thet can not dispaly somme effective Hashrate of rigs, but this rigs keep mining and activated normaly, only effective Hashrate graphe can not dispalyed

With nanopool most of the time the reported hashrate is zero (not always), but it was same on Claymore 9.5. not sure it is Claymore...

[fredeq]

Can anyone confirm that DAG slowdown will also affect 5xx series?

As it it right now, the Claymore miner epoch benchmarks show a rather significant ~10% drop after epoch 150 for the Polaris cards and progressively increasing after that. There are conflicting reports as to whether the issue is with the Claymore miner and if other miners, like SGminer are affected. Apparently AMD is also aware of the issue and are talking with Claymore about it.

Yes but I asked about 5xx series only

[Wicard]

Can anyone confirm that DAG slowdown will also affect 5xx series?

As it it right now, the Claymore miner epoch benchmarks show a rather significant ~10% drop after epoch 150 for the Polaris cards and progressively increasing after that. There are conflicting reports as to whether the issue is with the Claymore miner and if other miners, like SGminer are affected. Apparently AMD is also aware of the issue and are talking with Claymore about it.

Yes but I asked about 5xx series only

IF it's Polaris YES! it will be and are affected ...

[Vann]

Can anyone confirm that DAG slowdown will also affect 5xx series?

As it it right now, the Claymore miner epoch benchmarks show a rather significant ~10% drop after epoch 150 for the Polaris cards and progressively increasing after that. There are conflicting reports as to whether the issue is with the Claymore miner and if other miners, like SGminer are affected. Apparently AMD is also aware of the issue and are talking with Claymore about it.

Yes but I asked about 5xx series only

The RX 4XX and 5XX are essentially the same cards and both show they are affected by the Claymore benchmarks.

[NomadGroup]

Hey guys I just got my hands on some XFX RX480 8gb cards and wanted to bios flash them.  I know how to use ATI flash and Polaris but needed help to know the right timing.  Do I copy and paste from 1500mhz or do I copy and paste from 1750mhz and down?  Please help if anyone has had these cards flashed as well as maybe you have the best setting for them in afterburner after flashing to get the most of them.  I would really appreciate any help, thanks!

[tempgoga]

Any way to get -ttdcr working on Nvidia GPUs?

[TechPark]

Hey guys I just got my hands on some XFX RX480 8gb cards and wanted to bios flash them.  I know how to use ATI flash and Polaris but needed help to know the right timing.  Do I copy and paste from 1500mhz or do I copy and paste from 1750mhz and down?  Please help if anyone has had these cards flashed as well as maybe you have the best setting for them in afterburner after flashing to get the most of them.  I would really appreciate any help, thanks!

How is this related to Claymore Dual miner? You will have better chances for a good answer in threads related to BIOS modding.

[notbatman]

^ knowledgebase.

^^ 1500 if they work from what I'm told. Personally I don't tamper with the bios or overclock so that there's no argument if I have to RMA; a dead card with void warranty runs at exactly 0 MH/s.

[flashgear]

Guys, I'm confused here.

Am I right in saying that ETC and ETH, although using the same algorithm, they shouldn't be at the same Epoch number?

When I'm mining ETC, the miner is using Epoch 133 which afaik, is the same Epoch as ETH. Thus reducing hash speeds.

Is this normal? Surely ETC's epoch is reduced in comparison to ETH's