Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 07:53:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 [998] 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589759 times)
borgy001
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 07:30:24 AM
 #19941

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.
1714031615
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714031615

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714031615
Reply with quote  #2

1714031615
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Dmitrij98
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:00:32 AM
 #19942

Hello guys who faced such a problem, today put the new driver 18.2.1 on the farm computer, it costs two R9 Fury, in partial overclocking, claymore 11, Windows 10 last update, in the AMD 18.2.1 settings included the calculation, afterburner not disconnected everything continues to work, the hashrate from 59Mh/s to 62Mh/s that was pleasantly surprised. Nearby there is a farm 4 Fury R9 and 2 R9 290, installed, Claymore 11, driver 16.9.1, Windows 10 updated, installed the same, after installing 18.2.1 afterburner disconnected, rolled back to 16.9.1 hasht fell. In general, I moved Windows, installed drivers 16.9.1, claymore 11, afterburner 4.4.2 while everything works, but here the hashrate was 172Mh/s, it became 169Mh/s. Why does everything work on one farm and on another radeon tm adrenalin edition 18.2.1 vs afterburner do not work? Can the problem be in the R9 290 ?
nitrobg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 413
Merit: 17


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:07:53 AM
 #19943

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.
This hashrate is worthless, the RX cards do 1400-1600 XVG. Go mine something else with 1070 and exchange it to ETH, you're losing 50% of your earnings mining ETH with this powerful GPU.
borgy001
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:10:12 AM
 #19944

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.
This hashrate is worthless, the RX cards do 1400-1600 XVG. Go mine something else with 1070 and exchange it to ETH, you're losing 50% of your earnings mining ETH with this powerful GPU.

tnx for the tip
Rough_R
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:14:27 AM
 #19945

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.

I have almost the same results with G1 GTX1070 31,2ETH 870 XVG oc settings  memory +600, clock 0, and 75% power,

Does anyone mine something with CPU ?
I run Claymore dual and have i5-7500 working nothing in one rig ... is it worth trying at all ?
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:26:08 AM
 #19946

SOLVED!
I found the problem!!!
It was the Remote Desktop Connection
If you start Claymore miner remotely using Remote Desktop Connection and you check the logs you will see that it reports that there are no AMD Adapters.
ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
The miner will start, it will mine but it will ignore any overclock/undervolt settings for the cards!
I spent 2 days on that!!
I hope that will help some of you.
Please note that this problem does not occur if you use Teamviewer

Now you can check FAQ in Readme and find related info:

Quote
- I see only one card via Remote Desktop Connection.
  It's a problem of RDC, use TeamViewer or some other remote access software.

- I see only one card instead of two in temperature management info.
  Disable CrossFire, don't use Remote Desktop Connection.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
Jamsan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:44:27 AM
 #19947

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.
Turn up the DCRI higher - I run mine at 130 DCRI - 30.5 mh/s on eTH And 1300+ mh/s on XVG.
Xianantung
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 08:57:39 AM
 #19948

Got also had a working rig with 12 radeon r9 390 stabile running, but power use is high, i need 3 PSU to run it
At this time 3 cards are down (power supply cable burns out), rest still works

I also had a second rig with 10GPUs with the 4pin connector riser cards an an asus p10ws stabile for weeks


What driver and windows version?
DukeStylez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:30:47 AM
 #19949

I Have a R9 380X and a R9 280X. mining with claymore on nanopool for ETC, is that usefull at all anymore? Could someone help me choose the best pool and settings for my GK's?
I have a R9 255 with 2GB in a second rig, what can i mine with that card? since v.11 it should be possible to mine altcoins with it? how and which one is usefull?
it's just for Fun and maybee a few $ over.....
OptimusMine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:21:54 AM
Last edit: February 13, 2018, 10:34:28 AM by OptimusMine
 #19950

After spending the night reading all the posts in this thread and from other sources besides bitcointalk it seems to me that currently there are no reliable pools for mining XVG , due to overload of miners getting in the dual mining these days, since Claymore released v11 miner. Some pool are stealing just to much of your earnings while others are unreilable and disconnecting miners. People are calculating estimated profits on whattomine, etc and getting great earings but only on the paper, while in practise, when doing this new dual mining (Ethhash + Blake 2s) on these pools that currently support XVG the earings are half or less of the ones shown on whattomine and other calculators. Besides that we had a huge jump in difficulty in mining XVG due to the same reasons. So lets see, more powe consumption, maybe a drop of eth hashrate when dual mining, much more stress on cards then on solo mining, currently unreliable pools, struggle to configurate optimal settings. Mine conclusion: you should wait a few days or a week or two to see the level of difficulty of XVG,  and to see are there any reliable pools with no issues and steals.
Hope that some of ya agree!
cas33
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 234
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 11:16:00 AM
 #19951

Any confirmation on this or it is just the next FUD?

http://news.8btc.com/bitmain-to-release-ethereum-asic-miner-f3-with-72gb-ddr3-dram-in-q2
mine_phun
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2018, 11:19:15 AM
 #19952

Greetings miners,
I just started new pool for XVG on blake2s algo(for ETH+XVG dual). I will be more than happy if you help to test it and see if everything is okay. We set up only 0.5% fee and in next days or week expect more coins to mine or even few more algos.

stratum+tcp://xvg.ehu.bg:5766 -dpsw c=XVG

Kind Regards!
Enjoy  Smiley

@Aliscomputers , it seems you'r VERGE wallet of the pool is configured with the wrong algo as the displayed difficulty is way to low. If you want some help with this you can e-mail me @ nlpool.nl (At) outlook.com so i can help you. Now the people mining in your pool are not getting rewards  Embarrassed

And sorry for this way, but i cannot message you from this forum and couldn't find any e-mail address.

FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 507


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 12:01:50 PM
 #19953

After spending the night reading all the posts in this thread and from other sources besides bitcointalk it seems to me that currently there are no reliable pools for mining XVG , due to overload of miners getting in the dual mining these days, since Claymore released v11 miner. Some pool are stealing just to much of your earnings while others are unreilable and disconnecting miners. People are calculating estimated profits on whattomine, etc and getting great earings but only on the paper, while in practise, when doing this new dual mining (Ethhash + Blake 2s) on these pools that currently support XVG the earings are half or less of the ones shown on whattomine and other calculators. Besides that we had a huge jump in difficulty in mining XVG due to the same reasons. So lets see, more powe consumption, maybe a drop of eth hashrate when dual mining, much more stress on cards then on solo mining, currently unreliable pools, struggle to configurate optimal settings. Mine conclusion: you should wait a few days or a week or two to see the level of difficulty of XVG,  and to see are there any reliable pools with no issues and steals.
Hope that some of ya agree!

I agree at first I was earning around whattomine calculated now I can't make a 1/10 of that plus I can't keep my rigs on one pool it keeps switching to my failovers these yiimp copy paste pools with their junk servers need to go
wtfonly16
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 105


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 12:41:24 PM
 #19954

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

ye i aint bares
mine_phun
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2018, 01:30:19 PM
 #19955

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

You can mine on NLpool if you want

STRATUM SERVERS

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XVG] | for VERGE (Blake2S)

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XSH] | for SHIELD

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=CREA] | for CREATIVECOIN

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=MAX] | for MAXCOIN
BennyT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 259
Merit: 108


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 01:42:09 PM
 #19956


Lots of posts on this already. If you're new to mining I understand but or else the DDR3 ram headline should tell you it's not going to mine equihash.

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.
Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 353


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 02:02:08 PM
 #19957

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.

It must be a coincidence, friend has a farm and his hashrate is the same as it was, no change.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
molitar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 02:06:05 PM
 #19958

Since I moved to version 11 and blake my system keeps crashing Catalyst drivers and rebooting. It does not like Blake that is for sure or the new miner.
wtfonly16
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 105


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 02:11:07 PM
 #19959


Lots of posts on this already. If you're new to mining I understand but or else the DDR3 ram headline should tell you it's not going to mine equihash.

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.

you do know gddr5 has same bandwidth and speed as ddr3 right Huh
asics dont use gpu memory...

ye i aint bares
Kent2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 02:15:56 PM
 #19960

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

You can mine on NLpool if you want

STRATUM SERVERS

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XVG] | for VERGE (Blake2S)

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XSH] | for SHIELD

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=CREA] | for CREATIVECOIN

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=MAX] | for MAXCOIN

i mining this pool nlpool.nl  12 hours and 0 balance. 30 gh/s
Pages: « 1 ... 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 [998] 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!