Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 04:37:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 [1282] 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589692 times)
gedeonodn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 12:57:02 PM
 #25621

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky  on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.


what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing?

No i use the rxboost tool for linux from simplemining os, best you switch  to simpleminingOS run your own straps and run with phoenixminer... for rx400/500



You can use Amd Memory Tweak and use "REF" flag, it's the same thing, free to use

Cheers!

I wrote about the same few posts ago, people not read before ask Smiley

Would you share some infomation? What is correct interval of values for --ref, if you have some stats, what is most used values for GPUs, if possible by models?
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
1711643861
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711643861

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711643861
Reply with quote  #2

1711643861
Report to moderator
Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 23, 2019, 01:14:42 PM
 #25622

Latest one, i personally use 19.3.2 with compute mode switcher and atikmdag patcher.
are your cards stock or modded bios and what are your results?
Yes all cards uses modded bios since my straps still kinda better then straps in miner. So i only use rxboost on top.
btw if you change rxboost number or GPU clock its good to always pre-tune dcri at asm2,
Smokeyw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 03:07:42 PM
 #25623

still no big boost for amd vii ??
rigspec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 03:56:09 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1)
 #25624

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs


https://www.RigSpec.io
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 04:28:38 PM
 #25625

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs


https://www.RigSpec.io
Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
rigspec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 04:38:31 PM
 #25626

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs


https://www.RigSpec.io
Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 04:44:55 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1)
 #25627

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand.
To provide more understandable meaning:
Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR].
Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB].

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
rigspec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 05:09:57 PM
 #25628

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand.
To provide more understandable meaning:
Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR].
Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB].


Thanks for clarifying.... we actually built this farm in a way that all rigs had GPUs of similar memory manufacturers together (ie: Samsung, Micron, Elpida, Hynix).... we just need to figure out now which one gets the best performance with the rxboost with our tests and configurations
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 23, 2019, 05:43:25 PM
 #25629

No v14.5 for linux, or Am I blind?

This is my signature...
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 05:47:26 PM
 #25630

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy
I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue
...
What do You think ?

Done Smiley

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 23, 2019, 05:51:42 PM
 #25631

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy
I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue
...
What do You think ?

Done Smiley

Both links are same, so what should solve this?

This is my signature...
P00P135
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1122
Merit: 136


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:00:45 PM
 #25632

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy
I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue
...
What do You think ?

Done Smiley

Both links are same, so what should solve this?

Are you serious?
niros
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:03:48 PM
Last edit: May 23, 2019, 06:14:07 PM by niros
 #25633

Got quite a few ASRock H110 Pro BTC+, also not working. Doesn't matter what card.
Locks up Windows immediately as it tries to load straps. RX470/RX580
Working fine without any -strap or -rxboost, which is ok but not as good as it could be...
Claymore could you look into this for us? Thank you sir.

Claymore's Dual Ethereum + Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal/Blake2s/Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner.
=========================


Hi Guys,
Why are my 8cards setups crashing? The rig freezes immediatly after applying the first straps. When i remove the rxboost 1 it works fine. I dont have issues with my 5 and 6 cards setup.
The cards are 8x rx580 8gb. with Asrock h110.
Using Adrenalin 19.5.1 and Claymore 14.5

Please HELP!
Er0l
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:06:18 PM
 #25634

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs


https://www.RigSpec.io
Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

rxboost + 30mhz more Core on Rx470 gives huge Bump in hashrate, it was near nothing when i was running 1150mhz + custom Straps, but these 30mhz Core was the Key to the big Change Smiley
ekiller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1112


LLP Programming & Electronics


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:31:27 PM
Last edit: May 23, 2019, 07:56:20 PM by ekiller
 #25635

  Hello ,

Today 1st time i try  Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new  (-strap feature)    
I got error  "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"

Hardware :     12x   Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB  DDR4 RAM

Software :  W10 Enterprise  /  Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)

Visual memory settings :  16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all)  still error.
AzzAz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 08:15:06 PM
 #25636

 Hello ,

Today 1st time i try  Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new  (-strap feature)    
I got error  "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"

Hardware :     12x   Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB  DDR4 RAM

Software :  W10 Enterprise  /  Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)

Visual memory settings :  16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all)  still error.
I had 1 nvidia rig ( 6 cards) that just did not work if less than 16GB RAM.  And is your processor ok with 12 Nvidias?
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 556



View Profile
May 23, 2019, 09:00:53 PM
 #25637

  Hello ,

Today 1st time i try  Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new  (-strap feature)   
I got error  "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"

Hardware :     12x   Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB  DDR4 RAM

Software :  W10 Enterprise  /  Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)

Visual memory settings :  16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all)  still error.
Even 80G is not enough if you have 12 GPUs with 8GB ram on. You need to allocate 12 x 8G = 96G virtual mem to be absolutely safe. If you have that much space left to spare, give it a go and try again.
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 556



View Profile
May 23, 2019, 09:02:32 PM
 #25638

@Claymore: Any chance optimised timings could be made available for RTX cards? Eliovp seemed to say turing card regs are read-only... but there might be a way around? Have you looked at it at all?
ascaloon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 09:48:05 PM
 #25639

hey guys,

anybody know what is the issue with this? Im already try to disable secure boot in bios but not helped. If Im try to run claymore as admin it hangs. Any suggestion or solution for this? Smiley My hashrate still the same as before version, version 12 for example...

Here is the preview:

https://ibb.co/4T8TBfp

dwu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 09:51:26 PM
 #25640

With claymore you mean you run EthDcrMiner64.exe with admin rights or just a .bat? Try activating it in the file properties.
Pages: « 1 ... 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 [1282] 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!