gedeonodn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 12:57:02 PM |
|
Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost
I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock? I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here. Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer. what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing? No i use the rxboost tool for linux from simplemining os, best you switch to simpleminingOS run your own straps and run with phoenixminer... for rx400/500 You can use Amd Memory Tweak and use "REF" flag, it's the same thing, free to use Cheers! I wrote about the same few posts ago, people not read before ask Would you share some infomation? What is correct interval of values for --ref, if you have some stats, what is most used values for GPUs, if possible by models?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
May 23, 2019, 01:14:42 PM |
|
Latest one, i personally use 19.3.2 with compute mode switcher and atikmdag patcher.
are your cards stock or modded bios and what are your results? Yes all cards uses modded bios since my straps still kinda better then straps in miner. So i only use rxboost on top. btw if you change rxboost number or GPU clock its good to always pre-tune dcri at asm2,
|
|
|
|
Smokeyw
|
|
May 23, 2019, 03:07:42 PM |
|
still no big boost for amd vii ??
|
|
|
|
rigspec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 1
|
Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows. Specs:OS: Windows Claymore Version: 14.5 Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned)) We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS. Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage. Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:https://ibb.co/sWXkSDshttps://www.RigSpec.io
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 23, 2019, 04:28:38 PM |
|
Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows. Specs:OS: Windows Claymore Version: 14.5 Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned)) We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS. Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage. Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:https://ibb.co/sWXkSDshttps://www.RigSpec.io Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.
|
|
|
|
rigspec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 1
|
|
May 23, 2019, 04:38:31 PM |
|
Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows. Specs:OS: Windows Claymore Version: 14.5 Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned)) We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS. Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage. Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:https://ibb.co/sWXkSDshttps://www.RigSpec.io Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter. We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand. To provide more understandable meaning: Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR]. Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB].
|
|
|
|
rigspec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 1
|
|
May 23, 2019, 05:09:57 PM |
|
We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating
I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand. To provide more understandable meaning: Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR]. Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB]. Thanks for clarifying.... we actually built this farm in a way that all rigs had GPUs of similar memory manufacturers together (ie: Samsung, Micron, Elpida, Hynix).... we just need to figure out now which one gets the best performance with the rxboost with our tests and configurations
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 23, 2019, 05:43:25 PM |
|
No v14.5 for linux, or Am I blind?
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 23, 2019, 05:47:26 PM |
|
Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" ... What do You think ? Done
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 23, 2019, 05:51:42 PM |
|
Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" ... What do You think ? Done Both links are same, so what should solve this?
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
P00P135
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:00:45 PM |
|
Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" ... What do You think ? Done Both links are same, so what should solve this? Are you serious?
|
|
|
|
niros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:03:48 PM Last edit: May 23, 2019, 06:14:07 PM by niros |
|
Got quite a few ASRock H110 Pro BTC+, also not working. Doesn't matter what card. Locks up Windows immediately as it tries to load straps. RX470/RX580 Working fine without any -strap or -rxboost, which is ok but not as good as it could be... Claymore could you look into this for us? Thank you sir. Claymore's Dual Ethereum + Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal/Blake2s/Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner. =========================
Hi Guys, Why are my 8cards setups crashing? The rig freezes immediatly after applying the first straps. When i remove the rxboost 1 it works fine. I dont have issues with my 5 and 6 cards setup. The cards are 8x rx580 8gb. with Asrock h110. Using Adrenalin 19.5.1 and Claymore 14.5 Please HELP!
|
|
|
|
Er0l
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:06:18 PM |
|
Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows. Specs:OS: Windows Claymore Version: 14.5 Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned)) We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS. Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage. Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:https://ibb.co/sWXkSDshttps://www.RigSpec.io Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter. We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating rxboost + 30mhz more Core on Rx470 gives huge Bump in hashrate, it was near nothing when i was running 1150mhz + custom Straps, but these 30mhz Core was the Key to the big Change
|
|
|
|
ekiller
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1112
LLP Programming & Electronics
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:31:27 PM Last edit: May 23, 2019, 07:56:20 PM by ekiller |
|
Hello ,
Today 1st time i try Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new (-strap feature) I got error "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"
Hardware : 12x Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB DDR4 RAM
Software : W10 Enterprise / Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)
Visual memory settings : 16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all) still error.
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 23, 2019, 08:15:06 PM |
|
Hello ,
Today 1st time i try Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new (-strap feature) I got error "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"
Hardware : 12x Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB DDR4 RAM
Software : W10 Enterprise / Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)
Visual memory settings : 16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all) still error.
I had 1 nvidia rig ( 6 cards) that just did not work if less than 16GB RAM. And is your processor ok with 12 Nvidias?
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
May 23, 2019, 09:00:53 PM |
|
Hello ,
Today 1st time i try Claymore 14.5 on my rig because of new (-strap feature) I got error "CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt"
Hardware : 12x Nvidia gtx 1070 / 8GB DDR4 RAM
Software : W10 Enterprise / Nvidia driver (Latest with CUDA 10)
Visual memory settings : 16G / 24G / 48G / 80G (i try all) still error.
Even 80G is not enough if you have 12 GPUs with 8GB ram on. You need to allocate 12 x 8G = 96G virtual mem to be absolutely safe. If you have that much space left to spare, give it a go and try again.
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
May 23, 2019, 09:02:32 PM |
|
@Claymore: Any chance optimised timings could be made available for RTX cards? Eliovp seemed to say turing card regs are read-only... but there might be a way around? Have you looked at it at all?
|
|
|
|
ascaloon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 09:48:05 PM |
|
hey guys, anybody know what is the issue with this? Im already try to disable secure boot in bios but not helped. If Im try to run claymore as admin it hangs. Any suggestion or solution for this? My hashrate still the same as before version, version 12 for example... Here is the preview: https://ibb.co/4T8TBfp
|
|
|
|
dwu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 09:51:26 PM |
|
With claymore you mean you run EthDcrMiner64.exe with admin rights or just a .bat? Try activating it in the file properties.
|
|
|
|
|