Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 09:09:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 [1365] 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589757 times)
VictorGT
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 748
Merit: 523


View Profile
April 11, 2020, 12:56:49 PM
 #27281

version 15 works correctly up to the 376 epoch. The new version is not needed yet

when using Windows the first GPU takes something like 140-150 MB more video memory on top of the other ones that are just mining, so with that the actually used video memory gets closer to the 4GB limit and instead of 20-30 MH/s you might be getting just 1-2 MH/s for the first GPU and soon it might even stop working.

If you use the mobo IGPU for monitor, difference between first slot GPU and others is about 80 MB (Windows 10, GPU-Z).
1713949755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713949755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713949755
Reply with quote  #2

1713949755
Report to moderator
1713949755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713949755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713949755
Reply with quote  #2

1713949755
Report to moderator
1713949755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713949755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713949755
Reply with quote  #2

1713949755
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713949755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713949755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713949755
Reply with quote  #2

1713949755
Report to moderator
RAKOT
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 8


View Profile
April 13, 2020, 05:47:45 AM
Merited by xandry (2)
 #27282

I think have a pretty good number on virtual memory.  Initial Size(MB): 3000 Maximum size (MB): 20000






You should set the amout of VMEM like summ of all GPUs RAM size.
Dowper_
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 12


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2020, 09:41:45 AM
 #27283

Phoenix miner vs Claymore miner comparison - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzbwVkW5QyI

My crypto mining channel - Aleks Mining
RAKOT
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 8


View Profile
April 13, 2020, 11:16:32 AM
 #27284

Hello!

Anyone tested the mixed setup ( nvidia + radeon) ? Any tips of setting this right ?
bategojko74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 12


View Profile
April 14, 2020, 11:45:27 AM
Last edit: April 15, 2020, 08:12:21 AM by bategojko74
 #27285

Phoenix miner vs Claymore miner comparison - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzbwVkW5QyI
Dowper, you are just losing your time. Everyone here will label you a F....N TROLL, just because they are blind to see the simple truth. They don't want it. Here the truth has no value. These people have earned much more with the legendary Claymore miner when the Ethereum was $1600 USD so why should they bother to change their miner just for 4% more of $160 USD per 1 Ethereum. They have emotional affection with Claymore. Emotions are stronger than logic in most people.
issie81
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 760
Merit: 500

CryptoZilla


View Profile
April 14, 2020, 12:37:55 PM
Last edit: April 14, 2020, 12:57:58 PM by issie81
 #27286

Hey guys,

i am old school miner on Vega 56:)

i used TRM doing 44.5Mh but now i want to use Claymore (it's more legend miner), currently doing 43.5Mh losing 1Mh a card, i am mining with 380x Vega 56 and using MmpOS as OS is there maybe a switch optimizing the hashrate 1Mh loss might not seem alot but multiple with 380x it's actually alot

Cheers!

PS i use core 950 / mem 940Mhz (Hynix) or 960Mhz (Samsung) @ 837
impynick
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 6


View Profile
April 15, 2020, 10:29:59 AM
 #27287

Hey guys,

i am old school miner on Vega 56:)

i used TRM doing 44.5Mh but now i want to use Claymore (it's more legend miner), currently doing 43.5Mh losing 1Mh a card, i am mining with 380x Vega 56 and using MmpOS as OS is there maybe a switch optimizing the hashrate 1Mh loss might not seem alot but multiple with 380x it's actually alot

Cheers!

PS i use core 950 / mem 940Mhz (Hynix) or 960Mhz (Samsung) @ 837

TRM gets 50Mh on hynix vega56. You're leaving more than 10% on the table by switching
sxemini
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1558
Merit: 69


View Profile
April 15, 2020, 11:54:40 AM
 #27288

I think have a pretty good number on virtual memory.  Initial Size(MB): 3000 Maximum size (MB): 20000




no is not enough
raise it to 48.000 it should solve your problem

switch your mining to a linux distribution cause your cards of 4gb will mine much longer on linux than on windows, and linux is more stable

Linux more stable? Why? Explain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think you are wrong, setup win10 in the right way, it is also stable. Running my Rigs on win10 over 3 or 4 months without reboot is no problem.
big_daddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 583


xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol


View Profile WWW
April 15, 2020, 01:05:25 PM
 #27289

Linux more stable? Why? Explain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think you are wrong, setup win10 in the right way, it is also stable. Running my Rigs on win10 over 3 or 4 months without reboot is no problem.
I had the complete different suituation, mining on W7, later on W10 gave me such problems with stability and also hashrate drops that I finally decide to move on linux completely
Linux cannot freez, that's the main point, than I can still mine with 4GB cards

the remote management is much more easier too

If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
waywoos
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 2


View Profile
April 15, 2020, 07:20:53 PM
 #27290

i have a simple question for someone im sure.

i almost always us phoenix miner.

i want to know if there is a command to show me how many shares each of the cards is getting.
claymore only gives me a total and doesn't break it down like phoenix does.
and as well what is the command to stop it from writing a log file after every session?
thanks in advance
bluspirit
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 3


View Profile
April 15, 2020, 09:35:08 PM
 #27291

i have a simple question for someone im sure.

i almost always us phoenix miner.

i want to know if there is a command to show me how many shares each of the cards is getting.
claymore only gives me a total and doesn't break it down like phoenix does.
and as well what is the command to stop it from writing a log file after every session?
thanks in advance

For detailed statistics press "s" key while it running.
Start it with "-dbg -1" option for no log file and no debug messages.

You can find these informations and more in readme file.
klash1984
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2020, 12:06:12 PM
 #27292

hi , anyone still dual mining ?
any recommendationfor ETH + ?
Thx
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
April 21, 2020, 07:04:56 AM
 #27293

hi , anyone still dual mining ?
any recommendationfor ETH + ?
Thx

Dualmine is sooo 2017, I would stick to pure ETH.

This is my signature...
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 1708



View Profile
April 21, 2020, 07:14:33 AM
 #27294

hi , anyone still dual mining ?
any recommendationfor ETH + ?
Thx

Dual mining was very profitable during 2017-2018 because there were not ASICs back then. The reason why dual mining was possible was because the GPU actually stays idle the majority of the time and it's the GDDR that does most of the work. So claymore figured out if there is some algo out there that doesn't require tons of memory like ETH or ZEC or XMR then it's possible to dual mine like DCR SIA and PASCAL.

Issue with this is that it's very easy and cheap to design an ASIC which is much more efficient. So you basically have one ASIC that is maybe 50x the speed of one rig. Hence why the days of dual mining are done. Since the ASICs took over and not worth mining at all these days.

.BEST..CHANGE.███████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████████
..BUY/ SELL CRYPTO..
Sebahl
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 4


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 02:16:12 PM
 #27295

I am not sure if Claymore reads this, but are you working on enabling somehow offloading the Dag after it reaches 4GB? Maybe using a rig with some 8GB cards and some 4GB cards and averaging the Dag between the cards. Would make your miner even more popular.
br2459
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 102


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 02:23:10 PM
 #27296

I am not sure if Claymore reads this, but are you working on enabling somehow offloading the Dag after it reaches 4GB? Maybe using a rig with some 8GB cards and some 4GB cards and averaging the Dag between the cards. Would make your miner even more popular.
I believe that there isn't any way to offload the DAG. In order for the hashing to happen it needs to be loaded into the GPU's memory. I think this was discussed further up the thread.

sxemini
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1558
Merit: 69


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 02:35:00 PM
 #27297

I am not sure if Claymore reads this, but are you working on enabling somehow offloading the Dag after it reaches 4GB? Maybe using a rig with some 8GB cards and some 4GB cards and averaging the Dag between the cards. Would make your miner even more popular.

More popular?
Claymore is the most popular ethash miner over the last 4 to 5 years. And no he didn't read this.
Morph42
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 06:37:01 PM
Merited by nc50lc (1)
 #27298

New to mining, but have my rig setup and it's currently mining away.

12 x MSI/AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)

I'm reading through a number of posts and I'm seeing that my hashrate is really low per card compared to what others are mentioning.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 122.407 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 10.192 Mh/s, GPU1 10.197 Mh/s, GPU2 10.227 Mh/s, GPU3 10.205 Mh/s, GPU4 10.205 Mh/s, GPU5 10.201 Mh/s, GPU6 10.195 Mh/s,
GPU7 10.191 Mh/s, GPU8 10.219 Mh/s, GPU9 10.202 Mh/s, GPU10 10.183 Mh/s, GPU11 10.191 Mh/s

Here's claymore's report on my system
Code:
GPU0 t=59C fan=91% P=99W, GPU1 t=56C fan=88% P=98W, GPU2 t=56C fan=91% P=97W, GPU3 t=51C fan=90% P=96W, GPU4 t=56C fan=90%
 P=98W, GPU5 t=57C fan=91% P=99W, GPU6 t=52C fan=92% P=101W, GPU7 t=54C fan=89% P=96W, GPU8 t=55C fan=90% P=98W, GPU9 t=58C
 fan=91% P=87W, GPU10 t=54C fan=91% P=90W, GPU11 t=62C fan=92% P=102W
Total GPUs power consumption: 1161 Watts

I've downloaded the most recent version of the AMD drivers. 
When I initially ran claymore I did have to run the command "-drivers uninstall" as it was telling me a problem with that.  Did that and that error has gone away during startup of mining.
I'm thinking the next step is to overclock?  But even with my gaming machine I'm touchy about that due to the damage it could inflict. Is there an app that will test where I can safely set it up to?
hustleman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 6


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 07:01:35 PM
Merited by nc50lc (1)
 #27299

New to mining, but have my rig setup and it's currently mining away.

12 x MSI/AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)

I'm reading through a number of posts and I'm seeing that my hashrate is really low per card compared to what others are mentioning.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 122.407 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 10.192 Mh/s, GPU1 10.197 Mh/s, GPU2 10.227 Mh/s, GPU3 10.205 Mh/s, GPU4 10.205 Mh/s, GPU5 10.201 Mh/s, GPU6 10.195 Mh/s,
GPU7 10.191 Mh/s, GPU8 10.219 Mh/s, GPU9 10.202 Mh/s, GPU10 10.183 Mh/s, GPU11 10.191 Mh/s

Here's claymore's report on my system
Code:
GPU0 t=59C fan=91% P=99W, GPU1 t=56C fan=88% P=98W, GPU2 t=56C fan=91% P=97W, GPU3 t=51C fan=90% P=96W, GPU4 t=56C fan=90%
 P=98W, GPU5 t=57C fan=91% P=99W, GPU6 t=52C fan=92% P=101W, GPU7 t=54C fan=89% P=96W, GPU8 t=55C fan=90% P=98W, GPU9 t=58C
 fan=91% P=87W, GPU10 t=54C fan=91% P=90W, GPU11 t=62C fan=92% P=102W
Total GPUs power consumption: 1161 Watts

I've downloaded the most recent version of the AMD drivers.  
When I initially ran claymore I did have to run the command "-drivers uninstall" as it was telling me a problem with that.  Did that and that error has gone away during startup of mining.
I'm thinking the next step is to overclock?  But even with my gaming machine I'm touchy about that due to the damage it could inflict. Is there an app that will test where I can safely set it up to?

Have you switched to Compute mode instead of Graphics mode on the amd drivers?  If you haven't do it for each gpu.  Don't worry about overclocking.  Just don't put the memory over 2250.  so set powerlimit to -10, cclock 1150-1200 mclock 2100-2250.  If you go to 2250 and it starts getting invalid shares, back the memory down to 2225, 2200, 2175 ect, until it is stable.  Also at one of the -straps to ur command line to apply good bios timings to maximize cards potential. 
Morph42
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 21, 2020, 08:57:59 PM
 #27300

New to mining, but have my rig setup and it's currently mining away.

12 x MSI/AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)

I'm reading through a number of posts and I'm seeing that my hashrate is really low per card compared to what others are mentioning.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 122.407 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 10.192 Mh/s, GPU1 10.197 Mh/s, GPU2 10.227 Mh/s, GPU3 10.205 Mh/s, GPU4 10.205 Mh/s, GPU5 10.201 Mh/s, GPU6 10.195 Mh/s,
GPU7 10.191 Mh/s, GPU8 10.219 Mh/s, GPU9 10.202 Mh/s, GPU10 10.183 Mh/s, GPU11 10.191 Mh/s

Here's claymore's report on my system
Code:
GPU0 t=59C fan=91% P=99W, GPU1 t=56C fan=88% P=98W, GPU2 t=56C fan=91% P=97W, GPU3 t=51C fan=90% P=96W, GPU4 t=56C fan=90%
 P=98W, GPU5 t=57C fan=91% P=99W, GPU6 t=52C fan=92% P=101W, GPU7 t=54C fan=89% P=96W, GPU8 t=55C fan=90% P=98W, GPU9 t=58C
 fan=91% P=87W, GPU10 t=54C fan=91% P=90W, GPU11 t=62C fan=92% P=102W
Total GPUs power consumption: 1161 Watts

I've downloaded the most recent version of the AMD drivers.  
When I initially ran claymore I did have to run the command "-drivers uninstall" as it was telling me a problem with that.  Did that and that error has gone away during startup of mining.
I'm thinking the next step is to overclock?  But even with my gaming machine I'm touchy about that due to the damage it could inflict. Is there an app that will test where I can safely set it up to?

Have you switched to Compute mode instead of Graphics mode on the amd drivers?  If you haven't do it for each gpu.  Don't worry about overclocking.  Just don't put the memory over 2250.  so set powerlimit to -10, cclock 1150-1200 mclock 2100-2250.  If you go to 2250 and it starts getting invalid shares, back the memory down to 2225, 2200, 2175 ect, until it is stable.  Also at one of the -straps to ur command line to apply good bios timings to maximize cards potential. 

I hadn't actually switched to compute mode.  So I'll add [-y 1] but will do that for all cards automatically or do I need to list 0 to b?
I'll add the other recommendations
-powlim -10
-cclock 1200
-mclock 2250
and I'll try [-strap 1]
Pages: « 1 ... 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 [1365] 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!