Whiskey Jar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 1
|
|
December 17, 2020, 10:06:24 AM |
|
@Claymore, any plans to support new ETC algo?
Russian mafia killed claymore and stole his millions of coins. He hasn't logged on in over a year... He was careless, he did not take steps to hide himself. He was an easy target. People need to pay attention to this. If is worthwhile to the mafia, they do whatever it takes to complete the job. why russian mafia? may be it was italian mafia?
|
|
|
|
ubirgar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2020, 06:00:03 AM |
|
@Claymore, any plans to support new ETC algo?
Russian mafia killed claymore and stole his millions of coins. He hasn't logged on in over a year... He was careless, he did not take steps to hide himself. He was an easy target. People need to pay attention to this. If is worthwhile to the mafia, they do whatever it takes to complete the job. why russian mafia? may be it was italian mafia? Этo итaльянцы.100%
|
|
|
|
Metroid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
|
|
December 18, 2020, 06:39:35 AM |
|
why russian mafia? may be it was italian mafia? There is a difference between the Russian and Italian mafia, if it was the Italian mafia then they would still be getting claymore's devfee, the Russia mafia just want the money and the kill and that is it.
|
BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
|
|
|
Whiskey Jar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 1
|
|
December 18, 2020, 10:05:39 AM |
|
why russian mafia? may be it was italian mafia? There is a difference between the Russian and Italian mafia, if it was the Italian mafia then they would still be getting claymore's devfee, the Russia mafia just want the money and the kill and that is it. interesting.. i know only 1 claymore's devfee eth wallet from rwteam's post back in 2019. Address still receives devfee every day, but last outgoing transaction was 385 days ago. Outgoing transactions show that random eth values (like 585.5874, 684.4353, ....) were sent to several accumulate addresses, many of them are very old and empty. Couple newer wallets have 10k and 20k eth. Latest one of that accumulate addresses was sending round values (like 100,1000, 2000 eth) to yet another address, last transaction was done 145 days ago. That last address was only used to send round eth values (1000, 2000..) to Poloniex 2 address (0x209c4784ab1e8183cf58ca33cb740efbf3fc18ef), and last transaction was done 145 days ago too (about 3000 eth). Totally that address send to poloniex about 22k-23k of eth within 279 days starting 438 days ago . What can i say.. what a waste of coins, price was low as hell So Claymore wasn't logging to forum for more than a year, but still sent that 3k eth just 5 month ago to same poloniex address he was sending to earlier.. Hmm, i think he's okay but don't wanna work anymore. He's probably busy buying private island
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 18, 2020, 04:28:42 PM |
|
What if... Claymore = Satoshi Nakamoto ?
Satoshi ( profile;u=3) = Bitcoin Date Registered: November 19, 2009, 07:12:39 PM Last Active: December 13, 2010, 04:45:41 PM Claymore ( u=306958) = Ethereum miner and other Altcoin miners Date Registered: April 02, 2014, 11:29:01 PM Last Active: November 11, 2019, 06:37:41 PM The evidence shows that their 'registered' and 'last active' time were both 'PM' ( default bitcointalk time zone), I'd say that he's the same person. Wow, didn't realise that Satoshi was last active over a decade ago. Its a real mystery of exactly what happened with him and his riches. I think one day there will be a major box-office movie called "The search for Satoshi". He has billions of dollars worth of coins, you think he didn't sell any of them? He must have balls of steel pretty much. However there are times when there are coinbase transactions going back to 2010 which are being spent, maybe its Satoshi selling his mined coins in reverse of how they were mined. Given that a single reward block of 50BTC is over $1M now, he can probably sell one block every 2-3 years and still live comfortably. Whats also suprising is that even if Satoshi stays silent, his friends or family or enemies might not. And someone by now would of slipped and his identify would of been revealed. However its still a mystery.
|
|
|
|
Metroid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
|
|
December 18, 2020, 04:51:49 PM |
|
Wow, didn't realise that Satoshi was last active over a decade ago. Its a real mystery of exactly what happened with him and his riches. I think one day there will be a major box-office movie called "The search for Satoshi".
He has billions of dollars worth of coins, you think he didn't sell any of them? He must have balls of steel pretty much. However there are times when there are coinbase transactions going back to 2010 which are being spent, maybe its Satoshi selling his mined coins in reverse of how they were mined.
Given that a single reward block of 50BTC is over $1M now, he can probably sell one block every 2-3 years and still live comfortably. Whats also suprising is that even if Satoshi stays silent, his friends or family or enemies might not. And someone by now would of slipped and his identify would of been revealed. However its still a mystery.
From what is known, he lived in London from 2004 to 2010. I myself lived in London from 2004 to 2013. I guess he was a computer science student just like me at that time. If satoshi is not one of my personalities then I might have met him somewhere around London in that time.
|
BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
|
|
|
FloppyPurpleGherkin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 2
|
|
December 19, 2020, 11:25:05 AM |
|
If Satoshi ever moved a single of his 1million+ coins, It would cause some serious panic and anxiety.. He has the power the dump BTC down to $1 if he dumped all those coins on the market for whatever reason.. Investors know this and monitor all those old address.. A single coin hasn't moved from those early days.. You'd know if it did by the storm on Twitter etc
|
|
|
|
Binary100100
Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
|
|
December 19, 2020, 11:52:58 PM |
|
If Satoshi ever moved a single of his 1million+ coins, It would cause some serious panic and anxiety.. He has the power the dump BTC down to $1 if he dumped all those coins on the market for whatever reason.. Investors know this and monitor all those old address.. A single coin hasn't moved from those early days.. You'd know if it did by the storm on Twitter etc
I believe that if any of that was to begin to move BTC and altcoins would crash fairly quick just from the fear that the wallet(s) became compromised and someone was going to sell it all. I know that I would! Then when the price of BTC goes down to the triple digits, use all of the billions of dollars (USD) that you earned from selling it to buy it all back up again!
|
|
|
|
Metroid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
|
|
December 20, 2020, 12:51:05 PM |
|
that is it, this miner is dead, claymore made this miner to work only up to 383 on eth.
|
BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
December 20, 2020, 10:56:28 PM |
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
Thanks for the info, it helped get my 1070 TI/1080 rig back and working. With Phoenix I lost 20MH/s so glad it got back to normal again!
|
|
|
|
datminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2020, 05:01:19 AM |
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
-eres 1 worked for me, didn't try eres 0 yet but maybe not necessary Documentation from page 1: -eres this setting is related to Ethereum mining stability. Every next Ethereum epoch requires a bit more GPU memory, miner can crash during reallocating GPU buffer for new DAG. To avoid it, miner reserves a bit larger GPU buffer at startup, so it can process several epochs without buffer reallocation. This setting defines how many epochs miner must foresee when it reserves GPU buffer, i.e. how many epochs will be processed without buffer reallocation. Default value is 2.
|
|
|
|
zuoshou1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2020, 05:48:51 AM |
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
-eres 1 worked for me, didn't try eres 0 yet but maybe not necessary Documentation from page 1: -eres this setting is related to Ethereum mining stability. Every next Ethereum epoch requires a bit more GPU memory, miner can crash during reallocating GPU buffer for new DAG. To avoid it, miner reserves a bit larger GPU buffer at startup, so it can process several epochs without buffer reallocation. This setting defines how many epochs miner must foresee when it reserves GPU buffer, i.e. how many epochs will be processed without buffer reallocation. Default value is 2. As far as I could understand, we have only few days for migrating on alternate miner. Maybe week, but no more. Am I right?
|
|
|
|
UselessGuru
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 200
Merit: 3
|
|
December 21, 2020, 11:13:39 AM |
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
-eres 1 worked for me, didn't try eres 0 yet but maybe not necessary Documentation from page 1: -eres this setting is related to Ethereum mining stability. Every next Ethereum epoch requires a bit more GPU memory, miner can crash during reallocating GPU buffer for new DAG. To avoid it, miner reserves a bit larger GPU buffer at startup, so it can process several epochs without buffer reallocation. This setting defines how many epochs miner must foresee when it reserves GPU buffer, i.e. how many epochs will be processed without buffer reallocation. Default value is 2. As far as I could understand, we have only few days for migrating on alternate miner. Maybe week, but no more. Am I right? >> Maybe week, but no more. Am I right? Use parameter . This will give you one more Epoch (30'000 blocks) or about 3 days.
|
Co-developer of www.nemosminer.com (http://www.nemosminer.com)
|
|
|
black1ight
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 1
|
|
December 21, 2020, 12:33:50 PM |
|
Thanks claymore, now will have to try other miners :-)
|
|
|
|
Temido2222
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 2
|
|
December 21, 2020, 12:49:07 PM |
|
For all Claymore refugees, I recommend Phoenix. ~5 minutes to move my config over, and identical hashrates between the two on my 1070
|
|
|
|
ekhazaee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2020, 02:36:28 PM |
|
-eres 0 Got it working again, though not sure how well or for how long.
Thanks a lot for the info its work for 1060.last few days with phonix 5.3 i just got half a reported Hashrate as Current hashrate !! with 100% valid share but with claymore only 10% lower thad reportet hash.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 22, 2020, 03:25:03 AM |
|
What is the difference between -eres 0 and -eres 3 ?
I saw some people suggesting to use -eres 3 and I'm using this and seems to be working. Thx!
What eres command does is saves extra space on your GDDR when you first run the program and it creates the DAG. So -eres 3 loads the next 3 dags space difference. It does this because usually when there is a new DAG created and you need to rewrite it on your GPU, sometimes a crash can occur. So why the default is -eres 2. So it loads 2 extra DAG space onto your current dag. When people started to run out of space, they changed the -eres to 1 or 0 because it loaded less on the GDDR and managed to get mining started. However it was only a temporarily fix. So -eres 3 will run out of space earlier than -eres 0 which doesn't preload any extra DAG space. Let me know if this makes sense, its really hard to explain.
|
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
December 22, 2020, 09:15:21 PM |
|
I swapped to another miner, -eres 0 was giving me substantially lower hr on 1070ti, 1080ti, 3090, 3060ti cards I have.
I'd say what I moved to but all the other miner software still don't compare poolside to claymore and I'm not happy about it, about 10mh/s less than expected than the 20mh/s + than expected poolside I was getting from claymore just a few days ago.
|
|
|
|
jgonzi
Member
Offline
Activity: 639
Merit: 19
|
|
December 22, 2020, 09:28:54 PM |
|
I swapped to another miner, -eres 0 was giving me substantially lower hr on 1070ti, 1080ti, 3090, 3060ti cards I have.
I'd say what I moved to but all the other miner software still don't compare poolside to claymore and I'm not happy about it, about 10mh/s less than expected than the 20mh/s + than expected poolside I was getting from claymore just a few days ago.
Claymore and PhoenixMiner have inflated Mhs... is normal if you change miner that you will see real Mhs (lolMiner, TRM, ... )and not inflated.
|
|
|
|
|