Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 05:16:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: why not embed i2p?  (Read 1381 times)
paulie_w (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 04:55:18 AM
 #1

why not embed something like i2p with the bitcoin client, leaving it on by default or at least toggleable? what are the arguments against anonymity/security not being 'bring your own' ?
1714065363
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065363

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065363
Reply with quote  #2

1714065363
Report to moderator
1714065363
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065363

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065363
Reply with quote  #2

1714065363
Report to moderator
1714065363
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065363

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065363
Reply with quote  #2

1714065363
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714065363
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065363

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065363
Reply with quote  #2

1714065363
Report to moderator
1714065363
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065363

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065363
Reply with quote  #2

1714065363
Report to moderator
washort
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 05:14:44 AM
 #2

How does that help? What benefits does it provide? Bitcoin transactions are public anyway.
paulie_w (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 05:16:15 AM
 #3

no valid ip address == higher levels of deniability
kwukduck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1937
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 05:26:45 AM
 #4

It would provide good anonymity (depending on how you treat it ofcourse) and protocol obfuscation.
Bootstrapping into the network could be done better and more decentralized then.

And ofcourse, just because I2P is cool by design somewhat, like bitcoin.

14b8PdeWLqK3yi3PrNHMmCvSmvDEKEBh3E
Insti
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 252


Firstbits: 1duzy


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 06:16:33 AM
 #5

why not embed something like i2p with the bitcoin client, leaving it on by default or at least toggleable? what are the arguments against anonymity/security not being 'bring your own' ?

It is good practice not to make things more complicated than they need to be.
Not everyone wants/needs strong anonymity that something like i2p might provide.

Feel free to build your own client that does.
ctoon6
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 10, 2011, 06:20:30 AM
 #6

no valid ip address == higher levels of deniability

how does i2p hide your address? don't you need a valid ip to send data to its intended recipient?

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!