[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!

[CryptoBuds]

Damn, Franz, re-read, you're not actually joking?  That's something they're actually working on?

Yeah, I was not making that one up. https://ionomy.com/games
I think I agree with suchmoon. They should make cars, too.

I do gotta admit, this is an interesting concept. Card Against Humanity is an awesome game. Guess it depends on how they structure the game. I could see it having potential in all seriousness.

[1714064154]

1714064154

[1714064154]

1714064154

[1714064154]

1714064154

[1714064154]

1714064154

[o0o0]

The chain seems to have stopped breathing. Last block was more than an hour ago if the explorer is showing the correct time & timezone:



Edit: lolz

So like Mark from mt gox they test in a live environment?

Kinda like operating on a newborn baby just to test something.

[suchmoon]

So like Mark from mt gox they test in a live environment?

Kinda like operating on a newborn baby just to test something.

And the test was very successful. They figured out that if they cut the head off the baby will no longer breath.

[o0o0]

So like Mark from mt gox they test in a live environment?

Kinda like operating on a newborn baby just to test something.

And the test was very successful. They figured out that if they cut the head off the baby will no longer breath.

I love how they say see how amazon works in google playstore.. we are as smart as them.

Amazon actually has money and lawyers and money and did i mention money? They likely went to google had a chat did a deal etc. You know something that leverages market brand and partnerships etc? Im sure amazon just didn't sneak it in and be smart... because when companies do that then google just modify their tos and point at the section that says tos can change and hole plugged app removed. Remember google maps as a native app on ios as it was a deal for x years... omg notice now how there is apple maps and google maps removed from default ios and now only in app store. Same thing.. well except google maps doesn't invalidate any of the tos. So if a company of googles size with money etc get replaced by an apple inside app... how would ionomy fair against say err in app purchases and apple pay?

Im sure amazon isn't on ios because apple do their own book store sales platform etc. Its why amazon do the kindle...

There is no integration on those app stores.. Its all vetted and if it slips through it takes but 1 email from anyone to show apple and gone. Amusing that Adam a man of god has a plan that involves deception with apple and google to push through his plans. Maybe god should slap him upside the head and say... what are you doing?

Garza was born deluded and stupid with a side of pathological liar.. i think to an extent he honestly didn't know what he was doing BUT he always intended to scam he was just shit at making projects when he thought he was a god at it.

Adam... he's normal (intelligence wise i mean average) and just fails constantly at this but doesn't learn. He knows this too and thats why he's getting crankier by the day in slack . Not his answers are becoming more and more wait and see cryptic.. he doesn't have answers .

[boki15]

85 pages full of shit! Nice ontopic, 5 users posting against "hmmm, no rules" . Interesting, you 5 remind me really on hashtalk with the way how you talk to everybody. If someone replies to you, you ask and demand, with a lot shitting around when doing this, how productive is it what you do?

This thread is already locked , nobody, really nobody talks to you here. You opened it for yourself like we see and everbody does its best to silence others with being rude, 88 pages to say it is scam and nothing will work. 1 page is enough for most and these that read through will know more than in 85 pages of rudeness and frustration, here we have 85 pages already. I see you are not complaining about each others offtopic.

What if they are succeessfull? Did you take this possibility into account? Even if they sell shit, this shit in this thread seems to be lees worth then their ICO.

[rdewilde]

Lol I'm going to screenshot-archive these "conversations" on BCT and post those to Slack, get me more popcorn  

[ladrx]

Ionomy will be like Amazon soon selling their there apps! They have multiple ways.

Because they're there nice people.

Jesus Christ, now Adam Matlack thinks he's Jeff Bezos.

[CryptoBuds]

85 pages full of shit! Nice ontopic, 5 users posting against "hmmm, no rules" . Interesting, you 5 remind me really on hashtalk with the way how you talk to everybody. If someone replies to you, you ask and demand, with a lot shitting around when doing this, how productive is it what you do?

This thread is already locked , nobody, really nobody talks to you here. You opened it for yourself like we see and everbody does its best to silence others with being rude, 88 pages to say it is scam and nothing will work. 1 page is enough for most and these that read through will know more than in 85 pages of rudeness and frustration, here we have 85 pages already. I see you are not complaining about each others offtopic.

What if they are succeessfull? Did you take this possibility into account? Even if they sell shit, this shit in this thread seems to be lees worth then their ICO.

Please refrain from off topic posts thanks. And if they're successful, that's great for them. I hope it works out for them. It isn't for me but I'd still like to learn about it. I'm real curious about the game development, that is very interesting to me. It'd be nice if they answered some questions. I'm interested in their approach as people have different strategies that could be interesting.

[suchmoon]

Lol I'm going to screenshot-archive these "conversations" on BCT and post those to Slack, get me more popcorn  

By all means

Did you get the mac issue resolved? If not you should maybe have them try building blackcoin and/or dash and see which one has the issue (or if it's ION's own doing). Serious advice, I'm not mocking, that's how I would go about it if nothing else helps.

[Phildo]

Damn, Franz, re-read, you're not actually joking?  That's something they're actually working on?

Yeah, I was not making that one up. https://ionomy.com/games
I think I agree with suchmoon. They should make cars, too.

I do gotta admit, this is an interesting concept. Card Against Humanity is an awesome game. Guess it depends on how they structure the game. I could see it having potential in all seriousness.

From the description, it's nothing like cards against humanity, except that it's "edgey." Just looks like ruzzle minus the multiplayer plus being "cool" by ripping defintions from urban dictionary.

Hope they at least have the sense of humor to include this definition

[korvas128]

Phildo

What is there to disagree about? They said the first 2000 blocks would be Proof of Work with no reward. Block 1296 is one of many that has a 23 coin Proof of Stake reward. Is that an honest mistake? Was the first statement a lie? It's not an opinion it's a fact. Now, an opinion would be whether or not that's a big deal, and it may not be a b6ig deal, but it's still an issue. Your only hope for success is that they learned from the mistakes of paycoin, yet here we have the actual results not matching the promises that were given out before things started, and extra coins going into the hands of unknown people before everyone else gets a chance to get/stake any. Does that not sound familiar to you? are you really not worried about any of that?

Don't know the answer to this... don't think it's a mistake though. When you say 23 coin POS where are you getting the info from. I didn't think a block explorer was available yet.

If you had to guess, how many coins in total do you think were POS generated before block 2000. If I had to hazard a guess the POS coins were for testing, possibly to fund the electron element of a staker payout or to go into a bounty pot..... but like I said this is just a guess

If it's a real concern to you then you should visit slack and ask the question,

I'm not worried by this, I've been dealing with them for about a year with no problems. If you think there is a 1%+ chance of a scam then don't invest

BTW. Those images suchmoon is posting are taken from the Ionomy platform https://ionomy.com/. You'll need to sign up then you'll get access to those screens

I am not signing up for slack. I have barely even looked into this thing and seen enough red flags to stay away. They started this thread here, they're going to have to deal with the repercussions. The people inside the slack are either in on it or too brainwashed to see the light, just like the people in hasthalk and paycointalk and lendcointalk and all the other blablatalks where various stages of this saga have taken place. All I can do is point out the glaringly obvious problems that I can see from here, without even really trying, in hopes to keep other people out of the mess.

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward

https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

Now, the amount of coins generated via the POS rewards is trivial compared to the premine, but it still stands out as an issue to me. They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement. There are two reasons that statement could be true. either they lied about 1-2000 being POW or there was a mistake in the code. You said you don't think it was a mistake, then it was a lie. Why lie about such a meaningless amount of coins? How many coins do they need for staking rewards? They had 2.5 million set aside at the start, plus all the coins allocated to the ICO that no one bought.

I am not signing up for slack because this is not really a major concern or me. I saw enough red flags from the original post in this thread to stop me from being invested. that isn't going to stop me from following along and asking the questions that I think would be important as we go along. If you have no problem with a coin that literally started with a lie/mistake (I would consider all the blocks pre-distribution of ICO coins the start) good for you, but I'm still going to point out the flaws that I see. Feel free to ignore them, but while you are sailing away on the glorious ship IONia keep your eye out for icebergs, because I feel like there will be a lot of them out there.

Hey Phildo

I too have been doing some digging as what you said didn't sit right, I can confirm

0 - 2000 blocks had POS & POW with no reward got this info asking around slack, this is what the team said

POW phase was to make sure they had enough time to distribute mature coins, to make sure the network could stand on it on its own via POS That was the objective nothing else, again got this asking around slack

You said -- They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement.......... I searched but can't find where they said that so unless you can prove it different this is another piece of misinformation designed to discredit the team

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward
https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

This sync's up with what they said NO POW reward and a small POS reward 23 ion or $5.75 which is for all to see

[CryptoBuds]

Phildo

What is there to disagree about? They said the first 2000 blocks would be Proof of Work with no reward. Block 1296 is one of many that has a 23 coin Proof of Stake reward. Is that an honest mistake? Was the first statement a lie? It's not an opinion it's a fact. Now, an opinion would be whether or not that's a big deal, and it may not be a b6ig deal, but it's still an issue. Your only hope for success is that they learned from the mistakes of paycoin, yet here we have the actual results not matching the promises that were given out before things started, and extra coins going into the hands of unknown people before everyone else gets a chance to get/stake any. Does that not sound familiar to you? are you really not worried about any of that?

Don't know the answer to this... don't think it's a mistake though. When you say 23 coin POS where are you getting the info from. I didn't think a block explorer was available yet.

If you had to guess, how many coins in total do you think were POS generated before block 2000. If I had to hazard a guess the POS coins were for testing, possibly to fund the electron element of a staker payout or to go into a bounty pot..... but like I said this is just a guess

If it's a real concern to you then you should visit slack and ask the question,

I'm not worried by this, I've been dealing with them for about a year with no problems. If you think there is a 1%+ chance of a scam then don't invest

BTW. Those images suchmoon is posting are taken from the Ionomy platform https://ionomy.com/. You'll need to sign up then you'll get access to those screens

I am not signing up for slack. I have barely even looked into this thing and seen enough red flags to stay away. They started this thread here, they're going to have to deal with the repercussions. The people inside the slack are either in on it or too brainwashed to see the light, just like the people in hasthalk and paycointalk and lendcointalk and all the other blablatalks where various stages of this saga have taken place. All I can do is point out the glaringly obvious problems that I can see from here, without even really trying, in hopes to keep other people out of the mess.

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward

https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

Now, the amount of coins generated via the POS rewards is trivial compared to the premine, but it still stands out as an issue to me. They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement. There are two reasons that statement could be true. either they lied about 1-2000 being POW or there was a mistake in the code. You said you don't think it was a mistake, then it was a lie. Why lie about such a meaningless amount of coins? How many coins do they need for staking rewards? They had 2.5 million set aside at the start, plus all the coins allocated to the ICO that no one bought.

I am not signing up for slack because this is not really a major concern or me. I saw enough red flags from the original post in this thread to stop me from being invested. that isn't going to stop me from following along and asking the questions that I think would be important as we go along. If you have no problem with a coin that literally started with a lie/mistake (I would consider all the blocks pre-distribution of ICO coins the start) good for you, but I'm still going to point out the flaws that I see. Feel free to ignore them, but while you are sailing away on the glorious ship IONia keep your eye out for icebergs, because I feel like there will be a lot of them out there.

Hey Phildo

I too have been doing some digging as what you said didn't sit right, I can confirm

0 - 2000 blocks had POS & POW with no reward got this info asking around slack, this is what the team said

POW phase was to make sure they had enough time to distribute mature coins, to make sure the network could stand on it on its own via POS That was the objective nothing else, again got this asking around slack

You said -- They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement.......... I searched but can't find where they said that so unless you can prove it different this is another piece of misinformation designed to discredit the team

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward
https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

This sync's up with what they said NO POW reward and a small POS reward 23 ion or $5.75 which is for all to see

I honestly don't remember where they said the first 2000 blocks were POW and POS. Would you mind providing a link where that was said? Previous to this happening. I understand and appreciate you asking in slack and posting here, but I would like to see where it was mentioned prior to this. I only remember hearing POW for the first 2000 blocks.

[Nxtblg]

So like Mark from mt gox they test in a live environment?

Kinda like operating on a newborn baby just to test something.

And the test was very successful. They figured out that if they cut the head off the baby will no longer breath.

I love how they say see how amazon works in google playstore.. we are as smart as them.

Amazon actually has money and lawyers and money and did i mention money?

Yep, you mentioned lawyers.

Seriously: the boyz looks an awful lot like those "SEO experts" who find/reverse-engineer/luck into a loophole in Google's search algorithm. It works great until Google finds & closes the loophole, at which point it doesn't. 

[Phildo]

Phildo

What is there to disagree about? They said the first 2000 blocks would be Proof of Work with no reward. Block 1296 is one of many that has a 23 coin Proof of Stake reward. Is that an honest mistake? Was the first statement a lie? It's not an opinion it's a fact. Now, an opinion would be whether or not that's a big deal, and it may not be a b6ig deal, but it's still an issue. Your only hope for success is that they learned from the mistakes of paycoin, yet here we have the actual results not matching the promises that were given out before things started, and extra coins going into the hands of unknown people before everyone else gets a chance to get/stake any. Does that not sound familiar to you? are you really not worried about any of that?

Don't know the answer to this... don't think it's a mistake though. When you say 23 coin POS where are you getting the info from. I didn't think a block explorer was available yet.

If you had to guess, how many coins in total do you think were POS generated before block 2000. If I had to hazard a guess the POS coins were for testing, possibly to fund the electron element of a staker payout or to go into a bounty pot..... but like I said this is just a guess

If it's a real concern to you then you should visit slack and ask the question,

I'm not worried by this, I've been dealing with them for about a year with no problems. If you think there is a 1%+ chance of a scam then don't invest

BTW. Those images suchmoon is posting are taken from the Ionomy platform https://ionomy.com/. You'll need to sign up then you'll get access to those screens

I am not signing up for slack. I have barely even looked into this thing and seen enough red flags to stay away. They started this thread here, they're going to have to deal with the repercussions. The people inside the slack are either in on it or too brainwashed to see the light, just like the people in hasthalk and paycointalk and lendcointalk and all the other blablatalks where various stages of this saga have taken place. All I can do is point out the glaringly obvious problems that I can see from here, without even really trying, in hopes to keep other people out of the mess.

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward

https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

Now, the amount of coins generated via the POS rewards is trivial compared to the premine, but it still stands out as an issue to me. They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement. There are two reasons that statement could be true. either they lied about 1-2000 being POW or there was a mistake in the code. You said you don't think it was a mistake, then it was a lie. Why lie about such a meaningless amount of coins? How many coins do they need for staking rewards? They had 2.5 million set aside at the start, plus all the coins allocated to the ICO that no one bought.

I am not signing up for slack because this is not really a major concern or me. I saw enough red flags from the original post in this thread to stop me from being invested. that isn't going to stop me from following along and asking the questions that I think would be important as we go along. If you have no problem with a coin that literally started with a lie/mistake (I would consider all the blocks pre-distribution of ICO coins the start) good for you, but I'm still going to point out the flaws that I see. Feel free to ignore them, but while you are sailing away on the glorious ship IONia keep your eye out for icebergs, because I feel like there will be a lot of them out there.

Hey Phildo

I too have been doing some digging as what you said didn't sit right, I can confirm

0 - 2000 blocks had POS & POW with no reward got this info asking around slack, this is what the team said

POW phase was to make sure they had enough time to distribute mature coins, to make sure the network could stand on it on its own via POS That was the objective nothing else, again got this asking around slack

You said -- They said blocks 1-2000 would be POW. This is obviously not a true statement.......... I searched but can't find where they said that so unless you can prove it different this is another piece of misinformation designed to discredit the team

Here is block 1236
https://ionchain.com/block/73ce123f7b1fa011a1b4fb320fc7d10bad89dd0777e6a3efe5fe5c1b53b31311

Here is a transaction in that block that consists of nothing but a POS reward
https://ionchain.com/tx/8ba71247b921334e292050d72c1b508d5618c2c7866687361123fd00538bebfa

This sync's up with what they said NO POW reward and a small POS reward 23 ion or $5.75 which is for all to see

I'm not going to go and find anything, if I was wrong about that one, I was wrong about that one, there are still a million other red flags. I, and others, remember reading that POS would start at block 2000 after the coins were distributed. Even if that is wrong, the coins were not distributed at block 2000, so there were tons o blocks with POS rewards going only to the devs/whoever received the premine.

If that is all made up, I apologize, but I still blame them for not putting all of the relevant information in one place that is easy to find.

See how simple it was to answer questions? Now we can move on to the next issues.

What are the guarantees that the masternodes that pay out the charged staker payouts will generate enough coins to do that?

If these nodes generate too few coins for all the payouts what will be done?

If they generate too many what will be done?

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

[Franz_Huber]

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

Because there nice people.

[Tips4TaT]

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

Because there nice people.

What's wrong with nice people?

[boki15]

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

Because there nice people.

What's wrong with nice people?

Most think that these nice people are involved in GAW. Some did not go to the toilet during Ganza time and now its their turn. Somehow they think being rude, low level, abbusive.... is way better than to be nice. All of these experts forget 1 main thing, an good deal is when both sides are happy. If I deal with someone who is rude from beginn on, there will be no business. This is probably the main reason this thread got 88 pages, but keep on contributing here and you will understand that in crypto everythiing is vice versa, good guys are bad guys and bad guys are good guys, it changes from time to time, sometimes weekly.

I hope that you know now more than before why being nice is bad , but I am sure, there are at least 5 people who will explain it to you.

[Phildo]

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

Because there nice people.

What's wrong with nice people?

Most think that these nice people are involved in GAW. Some did not go to the toilet during Ganza time and now its their turn. Somehow they think being rude, low level, abbusive.... is way better than to be nice. All of these experts forget 1 main thing, an good deal is when both sides are happy. If I deal with someone who is rude from beginn on, there will be no business. This is probably the main reason this thread got 88 pages, but keep on contributing here and you will understand that in crypto everythiing is vice versa, good guys are bad guys and bad guys are good guys, it changes from time to time, sometimes weekly.

I hope that you know now more than before why being nice is bad , but I am sure, there are at least 5 people who will explain it to you.

Simple Definition of involved
: very complicated
: having a part in something : included in something
: actively participating in something


It's pretty clear that losing 6 figures to GAW involves actively participating in GAW. Now that we are done with stuff we haven't talked about in several days maybe we can move on to the new issues that have popped up with the coin.

[Nxtblg]

Is there any reason to believe they will be able to accept alternate payment on android devices besides "amazon does?"

Because there nice people.

And because a certain someone was so skilled at brining Amazon on board.

[boki15]

How to move on? You even keep on this 60 argument, lol, it was not your money and so its not a difference if its 1 or 1Mio unless you see the same problem as I do, scammer got these money and it makes difference if $1 or $10Mio. I think we agree on this.

To keep on, how to keep on, talking to each other about IoN and getting info from slack? Seriously??

The only way would be if the team comes over to talk. Talking seems impossible as well as providing an real discussion, this forum or forum rules are not protecting any user of this forum which means already, why should they come to get only attacked? Even if they have no answer, it does not mean they lie.

We will move on as soon as ion team appears here and they do not want because you boys and girls are so nice.

Now an question to you, do you think it is more productive if 5 scream that they are scammers or if you let them explain everytihng here and people could see that they are scammers or not. How about that? Being nice is hard , I know, they seem to be way better in that.