[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!

[WildShark]

@Moderator Mr. Korvas & Mr. Onion has trouble with Trolls deleting their valued post
When are these Trolls going to show respect for community informational data

Trolls are playing games of selectivity deleting post hoping we will start doing the stupid task on each other. Wild's Depot has already defined that the Trolls were using the "KNOT" theory on Ionomy 2019 vision. This is one of their attempts to show that it's NOT related to anything except hard ION DESIGN WORK. Their effort to delete showing growth of Ionomy 2019 that is taken in small slow forward steps.

The games continues by the DELETING of COMMUNITY ION DATA for NO VALID REASON   How are the Troll getting to auto-delete without the moderator having any decision on it  

IONomy 2020 collateral resources are the wave of the future  Smiley

Here's a look at the changing project milestones that keep getting deleted with very nice possible rewards for Q3 2019 for NEW ION Masternode investors. I can not understand why the ionomy cult would appreciate the growth with more of the crypto community purchasing ION and IONsx. What is wrong with 18 block reward split 3 ways  randomly to ION members every minute

IONomy GOAL - WiN 2019-2022 Milestones
October 2019 In-Progress Status

Create 2020 ION White Paper and register Ionomy collateral resources by end of Q3 2019 using Plan 8

@Mr. Matlack (Team ION) TRANSFER 9 Smart ION Nodes (4.5K Atoms or 120K IONs) to Wild's Depot for WiN concept, System Testing and 2020 ION White Paper

 WILD Innovative ION Network ownership in IONomy 2019 with (12 + 6 + Txid) 18 IONs Block reward (current ION Masternode owners get 12 coins) Txid fees being burnt

DEFECTIVE- FREE ION "NEWTRON" 4.0.1 wallet patch in Q4 2019 with 6 months system testing on ION NETWORK

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets with (4 + 4 + 4) 12 Block Reward in IONomy 2020

  (6 + 6 + 6) 18 IONs Block Reward for IONomy 2022 with Smart ION Nodes using multiple Ionomy collateral assets

No News (Q1 thru Q3 approach) is good news about ION coin schedule and events on ION Community Forum for future ION wallets

IONsx is the next Ionomy collateral resource (native token)  to be added to the ION Blockchain

Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer IIP status of IIPs 2 thru 5 have updated status to OVERCOME by EVENTS (OBE) to ION community & general public

Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources

ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms

Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
 

WILD Innovative ION Network Plan

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward

Plan 8 Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724

[1713551572]

1713551572

[1713551572]

1713551572

[1713551572]

1713551572

[1713551572]

1713551572

[1713551572]

1713551572

[o0o0]

@Moderator Mr. Korvas & Mr. Onion has trouble with Trolls deleting their valued post
When are these Trolls going to show respect for community informational data

Trolls are playing games of selectivity deleting post hoping we will start doing the stupid task on each other. Wild's Depot has already defined that the Trolls were using the "KNOT" theory on Ionomy 2019 vision. This is one of their attempts to show that it's NOT related to anything except hard ION DESIGN WORK. Their effort to delete showing growth of Ionomy 2019 that is taken in small slow forward steps.

The games continues by the DELETING of COMMUNITY ION DATA for NO VALID REASON   How are the Troll getting to auto-delete without the moderator having any decision on it  

IONomy 2020 collateral resources are the wave of the future  Smiley

Here's a look at the changing project milestones that keep getting deleted with very nice possible rewards for Q3 2019 for NEW ION Masternode investors. I can not understand why the ionomy cult would appreciate the growth with more of the crypto community purchasing ION and IONsx. What is wrong with 18 block reward split 3 ways  randomly to ION members every minute

IONomy GOAL - WiN 2019-2022 Milestones
October 2019 In-Progress Status

Create 2020 ION White Paper and register Ionomy collateral resources by end of Q3 2019 using Plan 8

@Mr. Matlack (Team ION) TRANSFER 9 Smart ION Nodes (4.5K Atoms or 120K IONs) to Wild's Depot for WiN concept, System Testing and 2020 ION White Paper

 WILD Innovative ION Network ownership in IONomy 2019 with (12 + 6 + Txid) 18 IONs Block reward (current ION Masternode owners get 12 coins) Txid fees being burnt

DEFECTIVE- FREE ION "NEWTRON" 4.0.1 wallet patch in Q4 2019 with 6 months system testing on ION NETWORK

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets with (4 + 4 + 4) 12 Block Reward in IONomy 2020

  (6 + 6 + 6) 18 IONs Block Reward for IONomy 2022 with Smart ION Nodes using multiple Ionomy collateral assets

No News (Q1 thru Q3 approach) is good news about ION coin schedule and events on ION Community Forum for future ION wallets

IONsx is the next Ionomy collateral resource (native token)  to be added to the ION Blockchain

Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer IIP status of IIPs 2 thru 5 have updated status to OVERCOME by EVENTS (OBE) to ION community & general public

Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources

ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms

Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
 

WILD Innovative ION Network Plan

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward

Plan 8 Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724

You’re a dickhead wildshark. forum members cant auto delete. they can only report and if a moderator agrees with report it gets deleted. its not me this time... look closer to home it might be korvas or maybe others. half your posts are bullshit. there is no substance just endless spam of the same wilds depot advertising of your plan. a moderator cannot agree with a report if your posts follow the forum rules. its not “ion trolls” being wrong and attacking you. if you follow the bitcointalk forum rules the reports wont result in a removal of post.

In fact based on your past bans and post removals you are in fact a bitcointalk troll. obey the rules or if you disagree remember you dont own bitcoin talk forum so cant set the rules. go post in meta sub forum if you think you are wronged.

ps this isnt twitter you wanker.... using @moderator doesnt get their attention. reports go to them in their moderator console and they basically read reported post only and click a button to decide. if you think you have a case and want to appeal make a post in the meta sub forum. i think you should it would be entertaining.

[korvas128]

I can give you a couple of VALID reasons

1) This is an ionomy announcement thread your post is offtopic nothing to do with ionomy
2) You continually spam it i.e. Indika posts a question you respond with posting it again !!

No need to complain on my behalf as it was my own fault my post was deleted. I forgot about the 2 posts in a row rule.

I'm the one that complained to the mods, I've asked you countless times to stay on topic but you ignore me so you left me no choice

[WildShark]

Quote from: korvas128 on September 29, 2019, 05:00:16 PM
1) This is an ionomy announcement thread your post is offtopic nothing to do with ionomy


According to the IIP Standards IIP 1, I am only getting "Public Acceptance" of a NEW and innovative ION proposals. You should take the time and read all the rules set forth by this approved standard. Can the voting be scheduled for IIP 7, 8 & 10 during the month of October 2019? The standards requires me to solicit comments from all ION technical forums. The last time I knew this was an ION FORUM. Posting in this active forum give me visibility with a lot larger portion of the crypto & ION communities that cares about ION. My target audience is NEW ION crypto investors. The innovated IIPs are getting a wonderful comments from the public. The only bad defect being mentioned is "NOT IONOMY". Everyone knows it's an on-topic ION improvement proposals for valued ION 4.0 investors... lol. Investors that want to see profit from this investment adventure with larger block rewards than half an ION coin.

Mr. Korvas, I am glad you have been demoted to TROLL controlling the community data and comments injected in ION announcement. Not everybody can see like the Korvas "closed mind" vision. A horse with BLINDERS ON at the reins of decaying ion-o-my cult 2018 mentality.

You should be well aware that ionomy has opened up ION Network design to consideration all innovated designs   Got as far as start of proposals numbers being correctly identify by ION investors and Mr. Korvas's lack of attesting attitude. I wonder if he would entertain a SECRET VOTE on ION proposals   Brought to you by professionals that encourage GOOD business practices in Ionomy 2020 vision.

Some ION NEWS to get your hump day started. Glance at the white paper to watch the product improve...

Signal a "YES" for Innovative Improvement Proposal Plan(s) 7, 8 & 10
with
Thriving 2020 thru 2022 IONomy Ecosystem


IIP 7 Increase-ION-Blockchain-Reward-with-Smart-Nodes-18-coins
IIP 8 Add-Developer-Assets-to-ION-Blockchain (ION 2020 White Paper)
IIP 9 Encourage-5-Year-Growth-in-Ionomy-Ecosystem
IIP 10 Ionomy-2025-Vision-with-ION-Blockchain-Network-Ownership (WIN concept with innovative ION Network)

Plan Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724

Show your ION community support to input into the ionomy platform design for 2020, add new masternode POS 4.0+ and competitive "mobile" game related requirements and/or helpful information to the new 2020 ION White Paper
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg51446862#msg51446862

@everyone  What do you think there is a prayer for ionomy Air-drop in the near future? Show the crypto community some Ionomy collateral  resources to the public...

A WINing 2020 Invester-Node configured for:
- 500  Atoms
- 250 DarkMatter
-  or a few 10K IONsx

would beNICE start of FUN  

"Strong Resistance is FUTILE"

Note: WIN concept supported by donations from Wild's Depot members and cyrpto community  

[korvas128]

According to the IIP Standards IIP 1, I am only getting "Public Acceptance" of a NEW and innovative ION proposals. You should take the time and read all the rules set forth by this approved standard. Can the votingbe scheduled for IIP 7, 8 & 10 during the month of October 2019? The standards requires me to solicit comments from all ION technical forums. The last time I knew this was an ION FORUM. Posting in this active forum give me visibility with a lot larger portion of the crypto & ION communities that cares about ION. My target audience is NEW ION crypto investors. The innovated IIPs are getting a wonderful comments from the public. The only bad defect being mentioned is "NOT IONOMY".

What part don't you understand

This is the Ion announcement thread NOT a public acceptance thread for your proposals. For that, you need to solicit support somewhere else

IIP standards mean nothing here this is a BCT thread so obviously BCT rules apply, you are off-topic

The vote for IIP7, 8 & 10 is currently scheduled for 'NEVER' as it's not ionomy

This thread was never a technical ION forum read the title

Good for you in getting wonderful comments from the public to your proposals. Create a thread and share it as here it's off-topic

Mr. Korvas, I am glad you have been demoted to TROLL controlling the community data and comments injected in ION announcement. Not everybody can see like the Korvas "closed mind" vision.

Yep that's me a closed mind

[korvas128]

You got banned from ION discord, banned from the ION community forum & your discord channel is empty. You won't start a thread to discuss your off-topic rubbish as you know no one will visit.

Your proposals of Venezuelan economics mixed with fantasy land acronyms is pure vapour, 'Arse vapour'. To call it shit would do a disservice to shit as shit exists whereas at best your ideas are just a foul fart smell that to you smell really good

You know this hence the reason why all you do is SPAM enjoying the smell  



Only a couple of days left to vote !!! have you figured out how to vote yet  

[WildShark]

You got banned from ION discord, banned from the ION community forum

Only a couple of days left to vote !!! have you figured out how to vote yet  

I don't understand your reasoning. The matter that I have left the ION Community forum is the forum has not posted a single ION announcement for over 2 years. What's the deal with no ION information on the website for TWO YEARS. The administers of ION Community have been so busy DELETEING USER's POSTs that there is no valid and current ION information. The ionomy has thought it was wise to discourage Mr. Onion from having a say in the 2020 THRIVING IONomy vision. It has already identified by Wild's Depot, that the "KNOT" theory is being used by non-valued supporters of Ionomy 2020 vision. The crypto community effort is NOT IONomy

NOT AFFILIATED


ionomy has also lost it support from the community when it closed down ionomy Slack. This use to contain private rooms that supported the valued ION customer. ALL this effort has disappeared with the emergence of ION 4.0 and the downfall of their ionomy deflationary plan to BURN and rip-off the ION customers with only Half-a-Coin reward. Is this a cruel joke being played on investors  

There is NO ION community present in ION Community Forum

VOTE "NO" for Deflationary IIP 6
Ionomy 2019 "Depressing" Half-a-Coin ION REWARD

Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources

ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms

Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
 

[korvas128]

The lastest Ionomy podcast has just dropped and it's a good one 


https://soundcloud.com/mpomy/back-from-the-dead-news-updates-ep09.

This episode covers The Fork, Tokens, XDM, ATOM, POTX!

[WildShark]

WILD Innovative ION Network Plan

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward

Plan 8 Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724

No substance ...  

NOT substance - Outstanding work by PAID professionals  

Here's a look at the changing project milestones that keep getting deleted with very nice possible rewards for Q3 2019 for NEW ION Masternode investors. I can not understand why the ionomy cult would appreciate the growth with more of the crypto community purchasing ION and IONsx.

What is wrong with 18 block reward split 3 ways  randomly to ION members every minute  

Plan 7 Increase-ION-Blockchain-Reward-with-Smart-Nodes-18-coins

Phase 1 wallet patch Improvement Implementation in Ionomy 2020

18 block reward (split 3 ways)  randomly rewarded to IONony members at rate of once a minute
Simple NEWTRON 4.0 wallet patch to increase block reward in Q4 2019
  Increases to 6 coins for all ION staking wallet
  Allows Ionomy LTD large staking wallets to earn 6 coins to payout weekly Ionomy prize awards
  Current and NEW ION masternode owners would receive 12 coins payout
  The ION transaction fee portion will NOT be burnt
  Spur ION & Atom 2019 ownership with increase growth of new masternode and sharenode owners
  Increase 4 times the ION reward for IONsx owners


The Ionomy 2020 ecosystem is currently made up of eight types of proposed Ionomy collateral  resources ranked from high to low order:
ION
Bitcoin
IONsx (sharenode)
Master ION Node
DarkMatter
Smart ION Node (Inactive till 2020 network)
Atom
Premium Investor Token (PIT)

Support 2020 thru 2025 Network Ownership
BUY/SELL
IONomy holdateral resources

ION, DarkMatter, IONsx, PIT, and Atoms

Trade at ionomy market (V3 platform)
https://ionomy.com/en/markets/ion-ionsx
 

Why does Ionomy 2019 dream BURN & RIP-OFF ION Investor with their new direction  

ionomy has also lost it support from the community when it closed down ionomy Slack. This use to contain private rooms that supported the valued ION customer. ALL this effort has disappeared with the emergence of ION 4.0 and the downfall of their ionomy deflationary plan to BURN and rip-off the ION customers with only Half-a-Coin reward. Is this a cruel joke being played on investors  

[korvas128]

Why does Ionomy 2019 dream BURN & RIP-OFF ION Investor with their new direction  

Is it a serious question or are you being rhetorical? or have you been banned

[WildShark]

Why does Ionomy 2019 dream BURN & RIP-OFF ION Investor with their new direction  

ionomy has also lost it support from the community when it closed down ionomy Slack. This use to contain private rooms that supported the valued ION customer. ALL this effort has disappeared with the emergence of ION 4.0 and the downfall of their ionomy deflationary plan to BURN and rip-off the ION customers with only Half-a-Coin reward. Is this a cruel joke being played on investors  

Is it a serious question

Just waiting for you to voice your opinion on ionomy new decaying  and depressing direction with a penny and half reward to ION investor... lol

18 coins Reward Benefits

Simple NEWTRON 4.0.1 wallet patch to increase block reward
  Increases to 6 coins for all ION staking wallet
  Allows Ionomy LTD large staking wallets to earn 6 coins to payout weekly Ionomy prize awards
  Current and NEW ION masternode owners would receive 12 coins payout
  The ION transaction fee portion will NOT be burnt
  Spur ION & Atom 2019 ownership with increase growth of new masternode and sharenode owners
  Increase 4 times the ION reward for IONsx owners

[korvas128]

No official confirmation yet but it looks like the community/investors have overwhelmingly voted to support IIP 006.

The ecosystem now starts a transition from POS to POTx which is excellent news 

Your proposals are the polar opposite of the team's direction. Other POS coins may welcome your ideas maybe even help you with funds and resource. 

If you can't handle life at the tip of a spear then it's time for you to move on. Looking at the no vote it seems you have already and are just trolling 

Stop being off-topic and move on

[altheshort]

Obviously I haven’t posted here for a long time, but I still follow this thread because I take some perverse enjoyment in reading deluded nutters of all stripes posting about altcoin nonsense.

Korvas and Sharkie are two such nutters, though the delusion differs between them.

Korvas: face some facts, old chap. Ionomy isn’t ever going to be a successful project, despite pivoting more than an Olympic gymnast. Your recent vote on what is supposedly the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin amassed an astonishing ~90 votes. For all your criticism of Sharkie’s lack of support (and we’ll come to that later), you hardly have a leg to stand on here. Over 3 years worth of toil and you have 90 investors/supporters who care enough to vote. And even that’s being generous and assuming that owners of multiple masternodes haven’t voted more than once (and let’s face it, they probably have).

You must be so proud.

This is a project crammed with incredibly, impenetrably niche ideas and inconsistent, ever changing implementation. It’s never going to amass broad interest, amongst gamers or the indie devs you’re apparently so keen to assume will be gagging for it. It’s ultimately going nowhere regardless of how many tokens you add or take away.

Sharkie: I have no words, honestly. Your project 8 or whatever bonkers name you’ve given it means nothing. It’s a jumble of half arsed, half thought through concepts borne out of underlying bitterness at the direction the project you’ve invested heavily in has taken. You appear to have literally zero support. You’ve never shown any real evidence that you have any supporters at all (other than your multiple personalities, perhaps), and I’m certain that no one outside of the tiny numbers of regulars that still read this thread to laugh at you and Korvas have even seen your posts.

I get that you’re sad that Ionomy have excluded you. Perhaps that was fair, perhaps it wasn’t. Who knows. By all means continue posting, because it’s funny to watch Korvas turn more apoplectic at each post you make, but don’t expect anything to change, because it won’t.

Anyway, I’ve said my piece. Carry on, you two. I need a giggle.

[WildShark]

Korvas: face some facts, old chap. Ionomy isn’t ever going to be a successful project, despite pivoting more than an Olympic gymnast. Your recent vote on what is supposedly the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin amassed an astonishing ~90 votes. For all your criticism of Sharkie’s lack of support (and we’ll come to that later), you hardly have a leg to stand on here. Over 3 years worth of toil and you have 90 investors/supporters who care enough to vote. And even that’s being generous and assuming that owners of multiple masternodes haven’t voted more than once (and let’s face it, they probably have).

You must be so proud.

This is a project crammed with incredibly, impenetrably niche ideas and inconsistent, ever changing implementation. It’s never going to amass broad interest, amongst gamers or the indie devs you’re apparently so keen to assume will be gagging for it. It’s ultimately going nowhere regardless of how many tokens you add or take away.

I think you are on the right track with a good analyst of what the ionomy 2019 has become.

For years now, Mr. Matlack's dream has been a moving window which they lag 7 months to a year in getting the product to the investor. His methodology to implement new ION functionality from a bottom-up approach. Keep gluing on piece after piece trying to achieve Mr. Matlack's dream. This dream is no where near the professional ION investor vision.

This what you call a honest vote when trying to ram-rod the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin. LISTEN to your professional ION investors and spur the ecosystem with an increase in Block reward. Ionomy sucess will start by using good business practices and register Ionomy collateral resources. Mr. Matlack have you tried setting milestones for the ION project and trying to achieve them ON TIME  

WILD Innovative ION Network Plan

ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward

Plan 8 Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724

No official confirmation yet but it looks like the community/investors have overwhelmingly voted to support IIP 006.

Think about it. A couple of days ago the vote was something like YES 81 NO 1. Why would someone who wanted to vote YES need to vote when it was always 99% on track for a YES result.

community lol.. The plan is done now that Mr. Koras has declared it...

The joke is Who is actually wants to use this worthless functionality   Where is the investor market of supporters  

[korvas128]

Obviously I haven’t posted here for a long time, but I still follow this thread because I take some perverse enjoyment in reading deluded nutters of all stripes posting about altcoin nonsense.

I aim to please   You should post more often, 2.5 yrs is quite a gap. Why post now?

Korvas and Sharkie are two such nutters, though the delusion differs between them.

In April 2016 many people called me delusional when I heavily invested in ION at $.2, not so many were around to call me delusional when ION hit an all-time high of $8  

Korvas: face some facts, old chap. Ionomy isn’t ever going to be a successful project, despite pivoting more than an Olympic gymnast. Your recent vote on what is supposedly the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin amassed an astonishing ~90 votes. For all your criticism of Sharkie’s lack of support (and we’ll come to that later), you hardly have a leg to stand on here. Over 3 years worth of toil and you have 90 investors/supporters who care enough to vote. And even that’s being generous and assuming that owners of multiple masternodes haven’t voted more than once (and let’s face it, they probably have).

Think about it. A couple of days ago the vote was something like YES 81 NO 1. Why would someone who wanted to vote YES need to vote when it was always 99% on track for a YES result.

You see pivoting like an Olympic gymnast as a weakness to me it's a strength. It's the quick & nimble that will survive in the ever-changing crypto space.  

You must be so proud.

Yes very proud, investing in Ionomy was one of the best decisions I ever made. I still remember when I bought in at $.2 setting a stretch goal of $5 and then seeing it happen  

This is a project crammed with incredibly, impenetrably niche ideas and inconsistent, ever changing implementation. It’s never going to amass broad interest, amongst gamers or the indie devs you’re apparently so keen to assume will be gagging for it. It’s ultimately going nowhere regardless of how many tokens you add or take away.

If you end up being right okay good assessment but if your wrong you've just passed up a 100x opportunity. I say you're wrong but we shall see

Nice to see you post again

[altheshort]

I aim to please   You should post more often, 2.5 yrs is quite a gap. Why post now?

Why post now? No good reason. I just thought I’d jump in to make sure you and Sharkie don’t let it die.

In April 2016 many people called me delusional when I heavily invested in ION at $.2, not so many were around to call me delusional when ION hit an all-time high of $8  

Slightly incredible that you’re still crowing about this when as far as I can see Ionomy didn’t sustain that value for very long at all. What’s the value now?

Think about it. A couple of days ago the vote was something like YES 81 NO 1. Why would someone who wanted to vote YES need to vote when it was always 99% on track for a YES result.

This is balls and you know it is. More likely: the masternodes are either ridiculously centralised to a few big players (probably including you) or your overall investor/community engagement is as low as it appears. Pick either, neither are a good look.

You see pivoting like an Olympic gymnast as a weakness to me it's a strength. It's the quick & nimble that will survive in the ever-changing crypto space.

Ionomy pivot to try and throw everything at the wall and see what sticks. So far nothing has. Attempt to spin it all you like, but that’s what the track record tells us.

To describe them as quick and nimble is somewhat amusing, too, given the massive amounts of time it usually takes for them to get anything to market after one their funny little hangout announcement things.

Yes very proud, investing in Ionomy was one of the best decisions I ever made. I still remember when I bought in at $.2 setting a stretch goal of $5 and then seeing it happen  

Again, what’s the price now?

If you end up being right okay good assessment but if your wrong you've just passed up a 100x opportunity. I say you're wrong but we shall see

It’s never going to be a 100x opportunity, and deep down I think you know that now. You’ve likely reaped the benefits of the massive amounts of inflation in this coin already, so the cynic in me says that the only reason you’re not bitter like Sharkie is because you made the most of the tiny about of time Ionomy was at a high and are at least break even already.

Thankfully I don’t think anyone is going to read your shtick and want to buy in now, but they’d be screwed if they did.

[korvas128]

I aim to please   You should post more often, 2.5 yrs is quite a gap. Why post now?

Why post now? No good reason. I just thought I’d jump in to make sure you and Sharkie don’t let it die.

In April 2016 many people called me delusional when I heavily invested in ION at $.2, not so many were around to call me delusional when ION hit an all-time high of $8  

Slightly incredible that you’re still crowing about this when as far as I can see Ionomy didn’t sustain that value for very long at all. What’s the value now?

Think about it. A couple of days ago the vote was something like YES 81 NO 1. Why would someone who wanted to vote YES need to vote when it was always 99% on track for a YES result.

This is balls and you know it is. More likely: the masternodes are either ridiculously centralised to a few big players (probably including you) or your overall investor/community engagement is as low as it appears. Pick either, neither are a good look.

You see pivoting like an Olympic gymnast as a weakness to me it's a strength. It's the quick & nimble that will survive in the ever-changing crypto space.

Ionomy pivot to try and throw everything at the wall and see what sticks. So far nothing has. Attempt to spin it all you like, but that’s what the track record tells us.

To describe them as quick and nimble is somewhat amusing, too, given the massive amounts of time it usually takes for them to get anything to market after one their funny little hangout announcement things.

Yes very proud, investing in Ionomy was one of the best decisions I ever made. I still remember when I bought in at $.2 setting a stretch goal of $5 and then seeing it happen  

Again, what’s the price now?

If you end up being right okay good assessment but if your wrong you've just passed up a 100x opportunity. I say you're wrong but we shall see

It’s never going to be a 100x opportunity, and deep down I think you know that now. You’ve likely reaped the benefits of the massive amounts of inflation in this coin already, so the cynic in me says that the only reason you’re not bitter like Sharkie is because you made the most of the tiny about of time Ionomy was at a high and are at least break even already.

Thankfully I don’t think anyone is going to read your shtick and want to buy in now, but they’d be screwed if they did.

Over this mornings coffee thought I would look at your post history as your name struck a chord, makes for an interesting read. This post especially made me



Fast forward 3 yrs 7 months..........  The project is still not dead in the water, in fact, quite the opposite. Trying to save XPY exposed them to the shower of shit that was the XPY dev team. When XPY was dropped they could have made a clean break as the only connection to Garza/XPY was they were just customers but they didn't. Even though it meant a ton of abuse they offered their XPY.io customers a transition from XPY to ION and we all know how that turned out  ... for those that transitioned it was:  

very very very well = sold at $8
very very well = sold at $5
very well = sold at $2
well = sold at $1

Today you are lucky as you now have a second chance. The question is will you repeat the past or will you learn from it

[altheshort]

Fast forward 3 yrs 7 months..........  The project is still not dead in the water, in fact, quite the opposite. Trying to save XPY exposed them to the shower of shit that was the XPY dev team. When XPY was dropped they could have made a clean break as the only connection to Garza/XPY was they were just customers but they didn't. Even though it meant a ton of abuse they offered their XPY.io customers a transition from XPY to ION and we all know how that turned out  ... for those that transitioned it was:  

very very very well = sold at $8
very very well = sold at $5
very well = sold at $2
well = sold at $1

Today you are lucky as you now have a second chance. The question is will you repeat the past or will you learn from it

I couldn’t have asked for a more amusing response. Things must be bad in the depths of the Ionomy investor community if you’re honestly trying to tap me up to invest.

Obviously I’m not going to invest, I’m not that stupid. Everything I said back then still stands, though I’ll admit that I grossly underestimated the fact that such a small bunch of saps would be willing to prop this up for so long.

The underlying issue is that this team achieved nothing of note with xpy.io, and similarly they’ve achieved nothing of note with Ionomy. If you disagree with that, perhaps you can point to some evidence to the contrary - maybe you can show off some dazzling stats about their user base growth, or some revenue projections, for example. As you’ve said, you’re several years in here, so surely they’ve shared some of these by now?

Ultimately, all I can see here is exactly what I saw in the beginning, which is a team that’s produced a bunch of vague solutions with no problems to actually solve. Their longevity proves nothing because there is no other markers of success to go alongside it.

[WildShark]

I grossly underestimated the fact that such a small bunch of saps would be willing to prop this up for so long.

Ultimately, all I can see here is exactly what I saw in the beginning, which is a team that’s produced a bunch of vague solutions with no problems to actually solve. Their longevity proves nothing because there is no other markers of success to go alongside it.

ionomy is improving by the flooding of tokens bloating the ION Blockchain. It's the ion-o-my way with decaying results

JOIN the ION-o-my FAD to

Create "Worthless" Tokens for Ionomy 2019 Ecosystem
"People's Money 2020 - Ionomy collateral resources"

The kids are drooling over having their own token on a blockchain forever... for FREE  

Download 4.0 ION wallet: https://ionomy.com/en/download
or
Simple ionomy V3 Trading platform wallet available at: https://ionomy.com/en/wallets/ion

[suchmoon]

dazzling stats about their user base growth

Their game scoreboards are always good for a laugh. It's the end of the week so a good time to look at it - the number of weekly players should be at its max.

Remember Offroad Heat they tried to promote on racing cars? Appears to be dead:


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

How about Gravity? The one that was supposed to be great because it took them so long to make it, turned out to be shit, they made version 2, and it's still shit:


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

And the crown jewel, with a total of 15 players, which means that 5 (!!!) of them are not getting paid this week:


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image