Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2018, 08:08:58 PM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: luck.. what's wrong with this math?  (Read 484 times)
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 13, 2017, 06:48:01 PM
 #1

I'm overlooking something here, and I'm sure someone can point out to me where my error is.

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected? 
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

Is #3 the flawed premise, or is something wrong with #1 and #2?  Or all the above? Smiley

Thanks.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
1540238938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540238938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540238938
Reply with quote  #2

1540238938
Report to moderator
1540238938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540238938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540238938
Reply with quote  #2

1540238938
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1540238938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1540238938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1540238938
Reply with quote  #2

1540238938
Report to moderator
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1380


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2017, 06:52:21 PM
 #2

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected? 
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

The average shouldn't be 60, because on average it took you 1800.5 minutes each to find the 2 blocks.  

If it took 1 minute for the first and 119 minutes for the second, then you'd be looking at 100% luck.

mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
November 13, 2017, 06:57:15 PM
 #3

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected? 
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

The average shouldn't be 60, because on average it took you 1800.5 minutes each to find the 2 blocks.  

If it took 1 minute for the first and 119 minutes for the second, then you'd be looking at 100% luck.

Okay, that means #1 and #2 are invalid.

120 minutes is 2x as long 60 minutes. 
30 minutes is 1/2 as long as 60 minutes.

Why isn't a block in 1 minute 60x better than expected?

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1022


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 11:04:43 PM
 #4

The issue isn't that 1 or 2 are invalid, the issues is the mathematics of calculating an average.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!