Now they [bbc] are saying Craig Wright is not Satoshi!!

[tiggytomb]

That's just the state of the media nowadays, truth no longer seems to be their priority if it ever was.  The only way anyone is going to believe a Satoshi claim is if that person moves some coins simple as that really.  This dude is getting more attention then he probably deserves.

Now watch him move some coins and I'll have to come back and edit this post 

[Enotche]

Well, it's the media! Their meaning is to manipulate opinion. About this Satoshi person we do not know if he (they) do not want to personalize themselves.

[BitcoinHodler]

this has always been like this about the news. they will always say the "hottest" thing and they twist their words so they are never saying "clearly" he is satoshi and never say he is not they post a hot subject then in the context there is no clear information and just confusion.

It'll be funny if Craig posts proof and they fuck up the second time. I start liking him more and more, he's really good at playing everyone. Precisely as Satoshi should be

What is the outcome ? Does playing people around gets you reputation or does it raises doubts on one's credibility .IMO,such people are bad for bitcoin.What can they provide to the community ? Don't you think bitcoin has bigger problems to be worried about rather than arguing over who's the creator ? The fact that you're liking him for something he is not shows your intelligence level,sir.

The google searches for Bitcoin went up 200% this week, it's direct benefit to the community whoever this Craig is you don't seem to like puzzles, I used to be like you. Bitcoin is a big joke on this world, its creator should be a big joker of personality. Craig Wright fits this description.

i hope this doesn't turn out to be a bad thing when and if it is proven that CW is just the biggest lier of the year.

[Za1n]

That's just the state of the media nowadays, truth no longer seems to be their priority if it ever was.  The only way anyone is going to believe a Satoshi claim is if that person moves some coins simple as that really.  This dude is getting more attention then he probably deserves.

Now watch him move some coins and I'll have to come back and edit this post 

Well even this wouldn't necessarily prove it was Satoshi, only that the person controlled Satoshi's coins. To me if the real Satoshi wanted to come back in the spotlight, this is what he should have done on day 1, not months later after several botched attempts at proving he is who he claims to be.

If and when these coins are ever moved, the more time and false attempts that occur in-between, the less likely the person who ultimately moves them is the real Satoshi.