[POLL] Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

[smho_16]

We don't know who he/she is yet but lets keep it that way. Knowing his identity can only do harm to the bitcoin itself,so he is a great inventor and has invented the best currency in my opinion so far. Claimers like Craig Wright has not done any good to the bitcoin, they wanted just some fame.
I voted on Neither and lets keep it this away, its beautiful to know its creator is anonymous.

[inoes]

Satoshi Nakamoto is none other than the founder and creator of why Bitcoins exist,  the unknown identity but very popular because of digital currency he made....  The man of Fame of all times.

He is a hero

agreed satoshi nakamoto he is my hero ,
i dont need working every morning to office lmao its the suck life before i know about bitcoin 

[jonald_fyookball]

Why didn't you list Hal Finney, or Nick Szabo, or Dave Kleiman, or any of the other folks who've been identified as plausible candidates?

To keep it simple... I think these two persons are the most obvious choices.

these (Dorian and Craig) are two of the worst choices...

[From Above]

I voted neither because I don't think the voting options u gave us r Satoshi Nakamoto

Satoshi Nakamoto was most likely a group

~CfA~

[LarryHocks]

I do not which one I have to choose but after the latest news about Craigh I must say that I believe him a sort of.
Its of course still not proven but I think he is the man behind the bitcoin itself.

[Hirose UK]

What do you think?

I think neither of them is Satoshi for onus to prove their claim that they are Satoshi is on them and none has proved it yet

I agree. It needs many proofs to claim as Satoshi. Besides, why should Satoshi be anynomous at first and want to be famous at last? it doesn't make any sense to me.

[coinsocieties]

The real question should be why do you care?  I think it is a good think not to know who the real developer is and that this secrete should die with him/her/them.  They did something good for the world and they may not want anyone to know who they are and why they did it.  There also may be other people out there that believe that him/her/they built a back door into the system.  These people may want to hurt them to find this out.  I say leave them be and look towards the future.

[Maesters1-]

i have no idea about this that who is he. actually there is not a single person who have a valid proof that he personally met to him. so i think we cannot conclude any thing about him.

[AioFox]

While we may not know who he (or she) was, we know what he did. Satoshi Nakamoto was the inventor of the bitcoin protocol, publishing a paper via the Cryptography Mailing List in November 2008. There have been some people who claim to be Satoshi; but in my opinion i don't really think Satoshi would want to be known by anyone.

[bravehearth0319]

Until now Satoshi Nakamoto is still mysterious who really he/she is.  And many of the people declaring themselves that they are Satoshi nakamoto but true is only a false declaration for themselves. But for what matter most now is there is community who love and believing in bitcoins, and that communities who love bitcoins is the real Satohi's.

[iv4n]

Neither of them in my opinion, they just wish to get some attention. My personal opinion is that Satoshi Nakamoto is team of people, its hard to make all this alone. Maybe one man had an idea for all this, but he made it real with friends and colleagues.
Maybe we will find out the truth one day, like for 20, 30 years. From time to time I think that some big secret agency stand behind all this, or some big company. I know it sound a bit stupid, but when I start to imagine about beginning of all this I get some strange ideas in my head, and in some moments anything can be possible truth.

[CoinBreader]

i vote neither,
my logic says it was a group, since there was no mistakes on the whitepaper and my conspiracy theory instict says CIA or NSA ,
(Satoshi Nakamoto, which roughly means "Central Intelligence" in Japanese.) or NSA because of SHA256 
go find out now ...! 

[tspacepilot]

I also vote neither.  Dorian was merely an accidental name collision.  CW, if he were Satoshi, wouldn't have had any trouble proving his identity.  That one almost got farcical at the end with that "I can't take the pressure" letter.  Both were sorta lol.

[kryptqnick]

I guess people mostly voted for neither, because nobody can know, who Satoshi is. That's the way he/she/they wants/want it to be

[btcking101]

yes i have also voted for neither like many others who voted.
I dont this it was dorian because he has no proof for that one.So neither is a better choise because no body proved it.